- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by TJMSmith (talk). Nominated by Trillfendi (talk) at 21:06, 20 March 2020 (UTC).
- Definitely an intriguing and well-sourced hook. Was nominated in time (within a week of being promoted to GA), and I don't see any neutrality or copyright issues. I just have one question for nominator Trillfendi: How many DYK submissions have you had in the past? If you've previously had five or more successful DYK entries, then a quid-pro-quo review of someone else's nomination is needed before this can be passed. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- I’ve had around 12 DYKs so far. I put pending for QPQ because I didn’t look for one yet and didn’t expect anyone to pick it up soon (2 DYKs ago it took over a month). ⌚️ (talk) 16:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- I just did a review. ⌚️ (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Very good. Now we're all set! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)