- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 00:10, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Created by Chiswick Chap (talk). Self nom at 17:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Length, date verified. All non-lead paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No apparent paraphrasing issues. QPQ done. Interesting hook; hook length ok. Issue: hook's ref not verified yet as the sentence supporting the hook lacks an inline citation. --Rosiestep (talk) 06:10, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Added another (online paper) ref, and repeated paragraph's ref (google book) in each sentence. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Verified hook, so this one is now good to go. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC)