Template:Did you know nominations/Frederik V on Horseback

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination  The following is an archived discussion of Frederik V on Horseback's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 00:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Frederik V on Horseback[edit]

Saly's statue of Frederik V on Horseback

Created by Rosiestep (talk), Ipigott (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 03:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

  • The citations have been added and the citation tags removed. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:32, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote4.png Full review needed now that citation issues have been addressed. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:15, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg The article was created on 19 January but nominated on 25 January and thus could not strictly qualify as new, but it was more than sufficiently expanded between 20 January and 25 January. The article meets all other requirements as well, as does the hook. I would suggest considering a move to Frederick V on Horseback, which would make the article about the statue consistent with the article about the eponymous king. Surtsicna (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
I don't think we should move the article to Frederick with a C. Explanations on your talk page.--Ipigott (talk) 14:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The move is not necessary for the nomination to be accepted, but I fail to see why the article about a statue of Frederick V should be titled Frederik V on Horseback. Anyway, the discussion probably belongs to Talk:Frederik V on Horseback. Surtsicna (talk) 15:01, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
I think we should move the dialogue regarding spelling options to the article's talkpage. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────Symbol confirmed.svgLength/hook/sources are fine. Date is also fine: either count the nomination just after UTC-midnight as more or less being the evening of the day before, or count as 'expansion' instead of 'new.' Whether the the name in the title ought to be spelled with a 'k' or with a 'ck' should not influence the DYK approval. Skäpperöd (talk) 09:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)