Template:Did you know nominations/Gurudas Banerjee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Gurudas Banerjee's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 04:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC).

Gurudas Banerjee[edit]

Sri Ramakrishna

Created/expanded by Presearch (talk). Self nom at 20:25, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

  • The article is new and long enough (3083 characters), properly sourced, hook meets criteria and the image is in public domain. The QPQ is problematic, I don't see the nominator's review in the linked DYK template. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 15:48, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing! Yes, a reasonable question wrt the QPQ. It was done on my behalf by User:Titodutta. He offered to do it HERE (DIFF) Then I asked him how it should be recorded HERE (DIFF) He advised HERE (DIFF) to explain this setup if asked, rather than explain it initially, as I had done HERE. So, that is the situation. As I type, this is the only DYK nom template that links to the QPQ DYK nom template (pages that cite) or the QPQ article itself (templates that cite) I saw no DYK guidelines or rules prohibiting one editor doing a QPQ on another's behalf. So while I would have preferred to note this directly up-front, this seems adequate to me.
So now what? Do you view this as adequate? Is the hook now ready to go? Thanks again for having reviewed this. -- Presearch (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg If Tito has consented for his review to be used as a QPQ here, then it's not an issue. I can't access source The story of the Calcutta theatres, 1753-1980 through GBooks, so I'm taking it on AGF. This nomination is good to go. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 17:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Yes, I do! We have been doing some works on Ramakrishna Vivekananda and this QPQ was a part of it! --Tito Dutta (talk) 20:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
    • Symbol confirmed.svg Just so that there is no confusion regarding this, I think this nomination is good to go. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 04:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)