Template:Did you know nominations/Monument to Women Memorial Garden

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MPJ-DK 17:06, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Monument to Women Memorial Garden[edit]

(

)

... that Barbara B. Smith created the Monument to Women Memorial Garden to defend traditional woman's values from the perceived threat of the Equal Rights Amendment? Source: An Eye of Faith: Essays in Honor of Richard O. Cowan, page 191

Reviewed: East Zhejiang Maritime Affairs/Folk Custom Museum

Created by FallingGravity (talk). Self-nominated at 05:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC).

Not a review of the full nomination but we cannot use the image (at least on the main page) as, being a copyrighted three-dimensional artwork, it is exempt from freedom of panorama under U.S. copyright law and thus any photograph of it is legally a derivative work. In fact, it cannot be hosted on Commons, either. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: I've removed the photo from hook. If the image is deleted from Commons then I will remove it from the article, too. ^Falling_Gravity 19:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Well, you could actually host it here under fair use; we do have a template allowing for that exemption (If you want to do this let me know; I'm very good at writing the rationale to satisfy the free-use zealots). Daniel Case (talk) 06:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Full review still needed. ^Falling_Gravity 03:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- New, long enough. Neutral and properly cites sources. I detected some rather close paraphrasing in my spot checking, which I did primarily on the "1933 Relief Society monument" section. A lot of the wording is directly ripped from the article being cited, with some minor wording changes. This will need to be substantially rewritten, as it currently constitutes a copyright violation. The hook is an appropriate length, interesting, and cited (AGF on offline source). After the identified close paraphrasing issue is addressed, this will need a thorough review for additional close paraphrasing issues, preferably from someone with access to the offline source. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 11:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

I've done some copyediting of the article. ^Falling_Gravity 18:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

I've altered some of the phrasing as well to avoid close paraphrasing of Susan Black's book (I was able to access the print source). Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

This nomination has been sitting here for a while. The hook is accepted in good faith based on the offline sources. Copyedits were made on the article after one of the reviewers mentioned there was close paraphrasing. Article is long enough, new enough, and everything checks out. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 17:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Suggestion: Run hook on March 8, International Women's Day. ^Falling_Gravity 18:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

To Prep 5 for March 8