Template:Did you know nominations/Ultimate X-Men (2024)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ultimate X-Men (2024)
- ... that Maystorm, a character from Ultimate X-Men, was initially created as a variant cover for the X-Men comic?
- Source: Cameron Bonomolo (January 23, 2024). "Ultimate X-Men Writer Teases "Something Completely New and Different"". Comic Book.com. Retrieved April 26, 2024.
Moved to mainspace by Cambalachero (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 123 past nominations.
Cambalachero (talk) 13:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC).
Hi Cambalachero! Overall, I think the article is well-written. Earwig showed no copyright violations, and the article was moved to mainspace on 16 August, so it is new enough. However, I have some concerns about the plot section. Although there are no specific standard for its length and the current plot summary is sourced, I think it is a bit too lengthy, as it is longer than the lead, editorial history, and reception sections combined. Trimming it down to around 400 to 700 words would be more suitable for the article, so it does not overly focus on in-universe content. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done, just made it significantly shorter. Articles about comics tend to be magnets for people compelled to add every detail of the plots, you get distracted for a couple of days and the plot section grows exponentially. Cambalachero (talk) 15:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Yea, I realise the one who expanded the plot summary section was not you. Thanks for cleaning up the article. Ready to go now! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done, just made it significantly shorter. Articles about comics tend to be magnets for people compelled to add every detail of the plots, you get distracted for a couple of days and the plot section grows exponentially. Cambalachero (talk) 15:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Article is not "long enough" due to the bare-bones lede section—please expand. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 15:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, but that's not the DYK criteria. "Long enough" is not subjective or open to opinion, it's about being larger than 1500 bytes. Concerns about the article unrelated to the DYK nomination should go to the talk page, not here. Cambalachero (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yet WP:DYKCOMPLETE states that any article that is to appear on the front page should appear to be reasonably complete and not some sort of work in progress; there's nothing presentable on a DYK nom with a lede that consists of nothing more than an opening sentence. Having said that, I'm reverting the approved tick. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I opened the comment with "Done". Meaning, although I do not consider this part of the DYK criteria, I did expand the lead as asked. Cambalachero (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, but that's not the DYK criteria. "Long enough" is not subjective or open to opinion, it's about being larger than 1500 bytes. Concerns about the article unrelated to the DYK nomination should go to the talk page, not here. Cambalachero (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)