The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Beautifully-written, well-researched, and accessible. All verifiable and informative. Hook is ready to go. --George Ho (talk) 02:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh, wait! This nomination is missing the QPQ; I wonder if you can submit a nom page that you reviewed soon. On the other hand, if this is your first DYK nomination, then let's disregard this message. --George Ho (talk) 05:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
QPQ is added, so let's wait for promoter. --George Ho (talk) 18:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Image is out of copyright without issues and suitable for Commons. Even the age of this image is obviously determined, even if digitalised. --George Ho (talk) 19:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)