From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Failed "good article" nomination[edit]

Upon its review on July 24, 2016, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:

had an obviously non-neutral treatment of a topic

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. According to WP:Neutral point of view, "All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly, proportionately and without bias."

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage summary[edit]

{{subst:QF-NPOV}}— ~~~~

With optional comments

{{subst:QF-NPOV|comments = }}— ~~~~

See also[edit]

  • {{QF-unstable}} - for articles that are victims of edit wars, or discuss a future event
  • {{QF-tags}} - for articles that contain cleanup tags
  • {{QF-source}} - for articles with too few references