Permanently protected template

Template:Unreliable source?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Template:Vc)
Jump to: navigation, search

[unreliable source?]

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]


This template is intended to be used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement. It produces a superscripted notation like the following:

It was actually written by Francis Bacon.[unreliable source?]

Articles tagged with this template will be categorized into Category:All articles lacking reliable references.

Place this template inline, {{Unreliable source|date=February 2017}} following the questionable claim (and any punctuation attached to it). The template should be placed outside the reference (<ref> ... </ref>), within the article's text:

Potentially controversial statement.<ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=February 2017}} Next sentence.


The template has the following optional parameters:

  • date: should be set to the month and year when the article was tagged. Example: {{Unreliable source?|date=February 2017}}
  • reason: a note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip. Keep it short (one sentence) as longer material belongs on the talk page. It is good to reiterate the reason in your edit summary. Example: {{Unreliable source?|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=February 2017}}
  • sure or certain: if set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable. Please use this with a |reason= parameter, and only after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question. Example: {{Unreliable source|sure=y|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=February 2017}} NOTE: This parameter has an alias, |failed=, which may make more grammatical sense when used with certain redirects like {{verify credibility}}.

When to use and not use this template

This template should be used to express doubt about the credibility of a source.

This tag should not be used on unreliably sourced contentious statements about living persons; if the source is not reliable, the statement should be removed immediately.

For whole articles or article sections that rely on suspect sources, considering using the banner template {{refimprove}} or {{refimprove section}}, respectively, rather than individually tagging a large number of statements.

For sources promoting fringe theories and pseudo-science, the more specific template {{Unreliable fringe source}} can be used. Even more specifically, flag improperly sourced medical claims with {{Unreliable medical source}}.

This tag should not be used to indicate that the sourced material could not be found within a given source. In that case, {{failed verification}} is a better template. For statements that have failed verification and have a questionable would-be source, consider removal of the source (and possibly the statement) over using both tags.


The following may presently be used as shortcuts and aliases for this template:

  1. {{reliable source}}
  2. {{rs}}
  3. {{rs?}}
  4. {{vc}}
  5. {{unreliable source}}
  6. {{Unreliable source inline}}
  7. {{verify credibility}}

See also

Inline templates

More templates

Policies, guidelines, essays, and wikiprojects