Template talk:2010–11 in Indonesian football

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Football (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This template has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Indonesia (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This template has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved Mike Cline (talk) 14:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC)



Template:2010-11 in Indonesian footballTemplate:2010–11 in Indonesian football – Proper naming convention has been to format as "2010–11" not "2010-11", uncontroversial move. Borgarde (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Support: Use of the en dash is proper per MOS:DASH. Oppose: no need to rename since it's in template space. — Bility (talk) 20:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment: I know MOS prefers endashes (for templates too?); but while typing, its much easier to type "2010-11" rather than "2010–11". Right? Besides, I don't think anyone will be interested in what we name our templates; we should keep it easy to type. Lynch7 19:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
    Yeah good point, the MOS applies to articles and templates should be easy to use. — Bility (talk) 21:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Template names are not externally visible, so the wisdom of moves like this one might be questioned. See User talk:Jenks24#Indonesian football move. I hope we don't get too many of these moves in the future. Fixing up template names to observe all the niceties of style should be a low priority. Jenks24 has suggested that, instead of proposing moves like this in the future, you just create a redirect from one form of the daterange to the other. Redirects are cheap. EdJohnston (talk) 23:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)



Template:2010-11 in Indonesian footballTemplate:2010–11 in Indonesian football – per WP:DATERANGE and consistency in pages starting at "2014–15 in" including Template:2014–15 in Indonesian football. Sawol (talk) 13:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Pointless. Just create the redirect if necessary. Readers do not see the name of templates so the MoS is irrelevant. Jenks24 (talk) 12:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.