This template is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Remember that article talk pages are provided to coordinate the article's improvement only, and are not for engaging in discussion of off-topic matters not related to the main article. User talk pages are more appropriate for non-article-related discussion topics. Please do not use this page as a discussion forum for off-topic matters.See talk page guidelines.
US based abortion articles in "pride of place"
In the "Movements" section, there's a general pro & anti section. And there is links to the US pro & anti articles. Should the USA based movements get a "pride of place" section right at the top? There already is a link to Abortion in the United States in the 'Country' section. Is that not sufficient? ____Ebelular (talk) 15:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
I have removed the American section just now. This is as per the WP:WORLDVIEW guideline. ____Ebelular (talk) 10:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
How many "[country] pro-life/pro-choice movement" articles exist? If there are many, I agree with you - though we could also expand the template to include links to all the existing ones. If we have articles for just the U. S. pro-life and pro-choice movements, it seems to make sense to include links to them especially. Simplebutpowerful 05:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't know how many other "$COUNTRY pro-choice/life" articles there are. There is still links to the US versions if you drill down into the 'Movements' section, or the 'United States' section. ____Ebelular (talk) 09:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)