Template talk:Baltimore (virus classification)
|WikiProject Viruses||(Rated Template-class)|
Name "Baltimore classification" no longer appropriate
This template seems to have been expanded beyond just the Baltimore classification (which as I understand it was just the I, II, III, IV, V, etc.) It now includes groupings above and below that level. A new title for the template is probably in order. Thoughts? Suggestions? Zodon (talk) 02:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Collapsing - by DNA/RNA/etc. or by Baltimore class?
The template was fairly large, so I added collapsing.
- First I tried it with making the groups DNA, RNA and retroviruses collapsible. e.g. 
- Then tried collapsing by Baltimore class (I, II, etc.) 
Out of date
This template may be well out of date by now. Editing here to remember to update it later. Bervin61 (talk) 12:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC) Seems to be out of date again: Pithovirus not mentioned as member of NCLDV (of course fam. Pithoviridae is a proposal only). Paramyxoviridae are now of order ...--Ernsts (talk) 05:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)