Template talk:British Royal Warrant holders

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Companies (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Queen Mother[edit]

It has been 5 years since the Queen Mother's death. Should her warrants be kept here? User:BarlinerFlag of Berlin.svgchat 16:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Errr.... yeah. I was just about to say the same thing. --Mais oui! 10:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, they should be removed. The warrants have now expired. --Breadandcheese 03:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
The Queen Mother's warrant are still important aren't they? Why don't we include hers, but mention that they expired in 2007? Something a bit like this:

British Royal Warrant holdersCategory:British monarchy

What d'ya think? --DWRtalk 19:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
As they expired, why not make a separate template especially for those? But it beats me why a reader would want to navigate amongst a list of former warrant holders in the footers of articles, rather than click on a link to Royal Warrant in the article. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Changed lead article[edit]

I have changed the lead article from Royal Warrant to List of Royal Warrant holders of the British Royal Family, as I think that is what readers are more likely to expect while navigating a WP:series. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

template on Twinings page[edit]

I am working on cleaning up the Twinings page...I don't find the content of this template to be very relevant to that page--a template describing brands of tea, for example, would be more relevant. Do you think we should cut down the size of the template? Or should we leave the template as-is and just remove it from that page? I'd prefer removing it from that page, and leaving the template as-is, but I wanted to check here first. Cazort (talk) 17:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC)