Template talk:Campaignbox Engagements in Confederate Arizona

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject United States / Arizona (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Arizona.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated Template-Class)
MILHIST This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Temp Templates and modules do not require a rating on the quality assessment scale.

Rename[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: without objection, done. Atmoz (talk) 13:32, 17 November 2010 (UTC)



Template:Campaignbox Battles in Confederate ArizonaTemplate:Campaignbox Engagements in Confederate Arizona — I think this template should be renamed "Engagements (or Conflicts) in Confederate Arizona". This way we can include events such as the Capture of Tucson (1862) and the La Paz Incident which were not battles. Those two articles are already linked by the template and because of this the title is a little misleading. --$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 23:52, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I think the same thing should be done with the "Battles of the California Column" template. Instead of "battle" it should be titled "March of the California Column" or just "California Column". What are everbody else's thoughts?--$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 23:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.