This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
@Tahc: first of all, no major change was made... all that was done was to tag the page as needing to be converted. Second of all, you rationale for reverting the change makes zero sense. The template can absolutely be converted and still work within the necessary template. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 09:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
I am sorry I did not word the edit summary better, but wish to prevent in advance the template being broken later.
Your view that it can converted be seems very unconvincing, since you (1) are clearly unfamiliar with any of the many templates involved and (2) cite no links, etc., that could show otherwise. tahcchat 09:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
If you are an experienced Wikipedia editor, however, you should already know better that to (1) make edits without useful edit summaries or (2) make controversial changes without discussion and consensus. tahcchat 02:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
@Tahc: I posted a very clear edit summary that I was tagging the page and Simply tagging a page is not controversial just because you don't like it. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
No that is exactly what controversial means. Controversial means others do not agree to it yet. You made and remade the edit, without a discussion, even after you knew it was controversial.
Your "clear" edit summaries cited no consensus anywhere for conversions, or even a possible reason, and cited no explanations for how it could be done. And since you had only tagged some of the involved templates you seem to have been unaware of how any of them fit together. tahcchat 02:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)