Template talk:Eglinton Crosstown line

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Trains (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
 

Extension to Pearson[edit]

See here for the future extension to Pearson Airport. Ng.j (talk) 02:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)


Eelamstylez77 (talk) wants to remove the "speculative" Phase II extension from the route diagram, whereas I feel it should be included, as it is discussed in the text of the article. What does everyon else think? Useddenim (talk) 14:20, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Keep. There are plenty of other RDTs that show unbuilt proposed lines/extensions/branches. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
It's been over two years and it's pretty clear at this time there is no funding or plans for the expansion, at all. It's not even on Metrolinx's long list to do. I'm going to remove it, if you disagree please revert and we'll discuss. - Epson291 (talk) 00:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Route between Laird and Kennedy[edit]

City of Toronto > Get Involved > Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT) > Frequently Asked Questions > Stations and Stops says "The LRT will rise to street level east of the Laird Station, immediately east of Brentcliffe Avenue." but that is as of August 20, 2010. Metrolinx' Toronto Transit Plan dated April 28, 2011 indicates 19.5 km of tunnel, the distance from Black Creek Drive to Kennedy Station. Useddenim (talk) 13:16, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Underground at Don Mills[edit]

My understanding is that Don Mills station will be underground. The Crosstown will pop up to the surface at Leslie, go back underground at Don Mills, and return to the surface again at Ferrand. Can someone change the template to reflect this? --Natural RX 15:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes. I've done something with that. Hope it is satisfactory. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks good! --Natural RX 21:34, 4 December 2014 (UTC)