This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
What merits inclusion on this list? — Brianhe (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for message, I really appreciate the way you left me message :), on topic of inclusion criteria, most of the time revenue mostly matters and second is leadership in market e.g. xyz company has very less revenue compare to other companies(all type of companies) but its market share is largest among others in its segment, so it should counted as top company. If you think I have added some that doesnt fit this criteria please revert it. Just make sure that while reverting provide summary/reason why its reverted. KuwarOnlineTalk 08:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hmm, this could be a problem if the navbox is seen as "my favorite companies", it really needs objectively defined inclusion criteria. This might be in terms of industries covered, revenue, number of employees and so forth. As it stands, can a line be drawn like "manufacturing companies with a billion USD revenue" (sorry, don't know equivalent in rupees)? — Brianhe (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
I just went through and broke down companies by sector. In doing so I looked at many navboxes, it looks like the billion-dollar cutoff is reasonable. — Brianhe (talk) 21:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Great, I think we need few more categories like reality, cement etc. $ 1 billion = ₹ 4600 cr. KuwarOnlineTalk 07:35, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
I think the template is problematic and should be deleted. Shyamsunder (talk) 18:39, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
In my view this is a very useful template but I agree that a clear inclusion criteria is required. I would suggest annual revenues of over $1 billion would be reasonable, I think most current entries meet this.Rangoon11 (talk) 17:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
The group has its headquarters in London and it dosent make sense to still call it an Indian company. Morever I think its owners have taken UK citizenship. - Jayadevp13 (talk) 18:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC)