Template talk:Millennium Line

Trains Template‑class

Trains Portal

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Template

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Missing the spur to Port Coquitlam[edit]

Right before Coquitlam Central station head outbound, there's a spur built towards PoCo, if someone wants to add that in. Maybe @Briguychau? Joeyconnick (talk) 03:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Port Moody[edit]

@Useddenim: this is a diagram of the Millennium Line. As said line doesn't have a transfer point with Port Moody (since that station no longer exists and/or has been incorporated into Moody Centre), then "Port Moody station" does not belong on this diagram. It's likely that the Port Moody station article should be merged into the Moody Centre station, too, since Moody Centre has in effect succeeded/replaced Port Moody. —Joeyconnick (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

… which is why I reduced the WCE to a simple overpass. Useddenim (talk) 21:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

violations of MOS:FONTSIZE[edit]

Hey Useddenim... rather than engage in an edit war, I am discussing here, but I do not understand why you keep reverting the edits I've made to avoid the template not following MOS:FONTSIZE, which is a clear WP:ACCESS violation. Since you've previously been engaged in talks around Routemap and font size, I'm not clear why you keep reverting.

The issue is that {{BSsplit}} and {{BSto}}, when used in the third Routemap column (or basically anywhere in the template where the text size is by default "cmt"-sized / 90%), render their text, especially the second/bottom line of {{BSto}}, in a size that is below 85% of the standard text size, which is too small. The fix is simple: put those entries in the second column, where the default text size is 100% and the rendered text does not go below 11.9 px (in the standard Vector skin). In fact, even when {{BSto}} is used where the default text size is 100%, its second/bottom line is still too small (11.0124) but at least it's an improvement in that its top line, and both lines in {{BSsplit}}, then render at 11.9 or above.

So I'd like to request your revert yourself and restore the larger text sizes, bringing this map closer into alignment with MOS:FONTSIZE. Thanks! —Joeyconnick (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]