Template talk:Motorola phones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


IT DOSEN'T EVEN LIST THE NEW Moto w375!!! 17:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

yeah the MOTOMAGX is missing, too! mabdul 0=* 20:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

l-series is missing[edit]

the whole l-series is missing o.O mabdul 0=* 02:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Moto Ming[edit]

just a suggestion, but you might want to double-list the Motorola Ming (aka A1200/A1210/A1200i) both in the four letter section and also the A's, seeing as the successor phones are all A1xxx's. (talk) 05:55, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


Would it make sense to separate out the recent Android lineup (Moto G, Moto X) from the general list? Crookesmoor (talk) 15:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes, and use their model names, not year of release. --WikiWikiPhil (talk) 14:25, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
@WikiWikiPhil: since these are all android phones, doesn't it look weird to have them not under android? If you look at Template:Android devices I think it could be modeled more like that. Either two hidden sections, one for Android broken out by series (with an other section, and the other section being feature phones. The section option, similar to the other devices there, have Moto be a subsection under android. Thoughts? - GalatzTalk 15:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
I was saving a section before moving onto the next, but you've reverted it... Please make whatever changes you think best. --WikiWikiPhil (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
@WikiWikiPhil: Take a look - GalatzTalk 15:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
I would still change the years into model names. None of the other sections substitute year of release for actual model name. --WikiWikiPhil (talk) 17:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Thats fine, if I remember correctly, thats what the articles used to be and were moved, which is why. Feel free to change that. My issue was that it was misleading the way it was shown before, as they looked like they werent Android phones. - GalatzTalk 17:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)