Template talk:Pink Floyd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Progressive Rock (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Pink Floyd (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This Pink Floyd-related template is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pink Floyd and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Proposal to modify the Pink Floyd template style[edit]

Include Syd and remove the album images[edit]

  • Support -- Longhair | Talk 08:27, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --the wub (talk) 14:16, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Support RedWolf 06:13, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- --Jacj 02:59, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Support - criminal that the template ranks him at the same level as Bob Klose. --High(Hopes) 20:22, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Support - wS 28 June 2005 20:33 (UTC)
  • Support - Hughcharlesparker 16:54:27, 2005-08-19 (UTC)

Don't include Syd and remove the album images[edit]

Keep the template as is[edit]

Other suggestions?

Bob Klose[edit]

Perhaps Bob Klose should be added to the Former Members section, as he was a member in 1965, the year Pink Floyd formed?

RfC: Should the Pink Floyd singles template be restored?[edit]

Should this template be restored? --Ilovetopaint (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Survey[edit]

  • Yes – {{Pink Floyd}} is ridiculously bloated and needs something to split off --Ilovetopaint (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
  • No. It's not so cumbersome in this navbox. It should certainly not exist formatted in the way it is above with decade and year splits, which is incredibly cumbersome. It's fine as it is. See also this discussion. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  • No the {{Pink Floyd}} is best place for this to go, unless people really want to remove it from the template and just replace it with a link to Pink Floyd discography#Singles. Leaving as is is my vote though. WikiVirusC(talk) 00:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
  • No - Leave as is. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Related people[edit]

These should not be re-added to this template, as these were split to another template, which was deleted for being "excessive" and borderline "fancruft". See this discussion where consensus was to delete, not merge this material. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

  • There was no consensus to keep all the "related people" off this template. Occasional session musicians and other miscellaneous personnel should definitely not figure. However, I think exceptions can be made for Bob Klose, and uh... I'm not sure who else. --Ilovetopaint (talk) 17:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)