Template talk:Recently revised
Would a link to the talk page be a sound idea, as the template requests review? PoptartKing 20:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Template needs improvements
This template should have a talk page link, urging an explanation on:
- What was the "rewrite" about? How was the article before, and what is it now?
- What needs attention? Citations missing? Spelling? Writing style and sentences? Facts?
Shouldn't this go on the talk page since it's not a clean-up or content-issue template? -Rocket000 20:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed, it is completely irrelevant to the reader that the article happens to have been revised recently, this template is distracting from the actual article, and it is not a cleanup template. I boldly added a note that this template should only be added to the talk page. Melsaran (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
AutoHide after 1 Month
Could someone please add an Autohide function so that the template will automatically hide/remove itself after ≈1 month? After about a year or so it's not really "recent" anymore. Thanks.--220.127.116.11 (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- The template adds pages to the categories under category:recently revised, which should be patrolled. That's a better solution that auto-hiding the tag, which can lead to half-finished pages being neglected. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)