Template talk:Original research section

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Template talk:Section OR)
Jump to: navigation, search

My First Template[edit]

Hi guys. This is my first template, so please check that I did everything correctly. --Slashme 12:08, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Seems fine to me. Thanks for your work! David Kernow 10:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Template:original research[edit]

I've replaced the code with:

{{original research|section}}

which produces:

in order to avoid redundancy. Superm401 - Talk 16:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

I added the date parameter. Superm401 - Talk 17:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Re-merge[edit]

{{editprotected}}

Please replace the existing code with an invocation of {{OR}}, as in the previous section, as there is no need to maintain two templates for the same task. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Have you made a "test template" in your userspace to check if the template does what it's intended to do? This is a widely used template, and I'd like to make sure that the transition works seamlessly. --wL<speak·check> 09:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Same, could someone test it on his userspace beforehand? I see this was tried and undone before, so I don't think this should be made lightly :) X mark.svg Not done for now. -- lucasbfr talk 09:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Re-requesting. Code is at template:sectOR/sandbox, test cases are at template:sectOR/testcases. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 13:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Problems with specifying talk page section[edit]

It seems like specifying the talk section isn't working. I had to use: {{Original research|section|discuss=Talk:Insulin resistance#Original research in symptoms list|date=October 2010}} because I couldn't figure out how to make it work with {{Section OR}}.  —Chris Capoccia TC 15:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

That's because {{Section OR}} only has one parameter: |date=. It does not recognise any others: there would appear to be a spurious paragraph in the documentation, which I have removed. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Restore to long version[edit]

Per Template_talk:Unreferenced_section#Restore_to_long_version and User_talk:SilkTork#Template:Section_OR, unless there are objections I shall amend the parent template so that this section version is restored to the long version in line with other section templates. I placed a notice on the parent template several days ago, and there have been no objections. SilkTork ✔Tea time 08:08, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 22 February 2015[edit]

Add a redirect to Template:Original research section because of a double redirect. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 02:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

@Qwertyxp2000: Yellow check.svg Partly done: I saw no reason to add a redirect. However, I did see a reason to fix a double redirect. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done and you had done my thing. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)