This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Is RM-85 misplaced in template-category? [Or Nike-Cajun misplaced under RM-65?]
It links to non-military. but then the source says "One solution was to combine existing rocket boosters into multi-stage rockets, and the most important first stage motor for these applications was the M5 (X216A2) booster of the SAM-A-7-MIM-3 Nike Ajax anti-aircraft missile." I guess air-to-air means "air-to-aircraft"? That aside, isn't it "ground-to", not "air-to"?comp.arch (talk) 17:59, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
That article really needs some love. I've added one that makes the designation clearer: Nike-Cajun was given the designation XRM-85 originally; later it became PWN-3 when MacNamara forced the unifed designation system's adoption. (Really, the whole "N-for-research-rocket" series needs a lot of work.) I'm not sure where your comment about air-to-air vs. surface-to-air comes from? "Air-to-air" means "aircraft launched for use against aircraft", ground-launced vs. aircraft would be "surface-to-air". - The BushrangerOne ping only 21:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for answering. I just happened to make minor edits to two articles about "missiles", that I do not really know anything about. I guess the "missiles" or the technology has to do with the military, that is, some missile technology is used for a sounding rocket. I had second thoughts on my addition to this template, as not all rockets are missiles. But still Missile says:
An ordinary English-language usage predating guided weapons, a missile is "any thrown object"
Of course "to-air" means "to-aircraft".. I'm from a non-military country.. :) but anyway, doesn't matter it's in "Other missiles"-category. I just looked at it wrong. comp.arch (talk) 09:23, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Right, I saw that you changed to "See also". That is good, still should "Template:Missile types" be included in Nike-Cajun based on the template's heading? I do not care to much, leave in your hands. comp.arch (talk) 11:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Yep, that's appropriate: rockets and missiles designated under the various U.S. designation systems (i.e have a designation system sequence navbox) have that one as well as part of the standard page formatting. - The BushrangerOne ping only 11:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)