Ten Principal Disciples
|Part of a series on|
The ten principal disciples were the main disciples of Gautama Buddha. Depending on the scripture, the disciples included in this group vary. In many Mahāyāna discourses, these ten disciples are mentioned, but in differing order. The ten disciples can be found as an iconographic group in notable places in the Mogao Caves. They are mentioned in Chinese texts from the fourth century BCE until the twelfth century CE, and are the most honored of the groups of disciples, especially so in China and Central Asia. The ten disciples are mentioned in the Mahāyāna text Vimalakīrti-nideśa, among others. In this text, they are called the "Ten Wise Ones" (pinyin: shih-che), a term which is normally used for the disciples of Confucius.
Śāriputra (Sanskrit: शारिपुत्र, romanized: Śāriputra; Tibetan: ཤཱ་རིའི་བུ་, Pali: Sāriputta) (lit. "the son of Śāri"); born Upatiṣya (Pali: Upatissa); was one of the top disciples of the Buddha. He is considered the first of the Buddha's two chief disciples, together with Maudgalyāyana (Pali: Moggallāna). Śāriputra had a key leadership role in the ministry of the Buddha and is considered in many Buddhist schools to have been important in the development of the Buddhist Abhidharma. He appears in several Mahayana sutras, and in some sutras, is used as a counterpoint to represent the Hinayana school of Buddhism.
Buddhist texts relate that Śāriputra and Maudgalyāyana were childhood friends who became spiritual wanderers in their youth. After having searched for spiritual truth for a while, they came into contact with the teachings of the Buddha and ordained as monks under him, after which the Buddha declared the friends his two chief disciples. Śāriputra was said to have attained enlightenment as an arhat two weeks after ordaining. As chief disciple Śāriputra assumed a leadership role in the Sangha, doing tasks like looking after monks, giving them objects of meditation, and clarifying points of doctrine. He was the first disciple the Buddha allowed to ordain other monks. Śāriputra died shortly before the Buddha in his hometown and was cremated. According to Buddhist texts, his relics were then enshrined at Jetavana Monastery. Archaeological findings from the 1800s suggest his relics may have been redistributed across the Indian subcontinent by subsequent kings.
Śāriputra is regarded as an important and wise disciple of the Buddha, particularly in Theravada Buddhism where he is given a status close to a second Buddha. In Buddhist art, he is often depicted alongside the Buddha, usually to his right. He was known for his strict adherence to the Buddhist monastic rules, as well as for his wisdom and teaching ability, giving him the title "General of the Dharma" (Sanskrit: Dharmasenapati; Pali: Dhammasenāpati). Śāriputra is considered the disciple of the Buddha who was foremost in wisdom. His female counterpart was Kṣemā.
Maudgalyāyana (Pali: Moggallāna), also known as Mahāmaudgalyāyana or by his birth name Kolita, was one of the Buddha's closest disciples. He is considered the second of the Buddha's two foremost male disciples, together with Śāriputra. Traditional accounts relate that Maudgalyāyana and Śāriputra become spiritual wanderers in their youth. After having searched for spiritual truth for a while, they come into contact with the Buddhist teaching through verses that have become widely known in the Buddhist world. Eventually they meet the Buddha himself and ordain as monks under him. Maudgalyāyana attains enlightenment shortly after that.
Maudgalyayana and Śāriputra have a deep spiritual friendship. They are depicted in Buddhist art as the two disciples that accompany the Buddha, and they have complementing roles as teachers. As a teacher, Maudgalyayana is known for his psychic powers, and he is often depicted using these in his teaching methods. In many early Buddhist canons, Maudgalyāyana is instrumental in re-uniting the monastic community after Devadatta causes a schism. Furthermore, Maudgalyāyana is connected with accounts about the making of the first Buddha image. Maudgalyāyana dies at the age of eighty-four, killed through the efforts of a rival sect. This violent death is described in Buddhist scriptures as a result of Maudgalyāyana's karma of having killed his own parents in a previous life.
Through post-canonical texts, Maudgalyāyana became known for his filial piety through a popular account of him transferring his merits to his mother. This led to a tradition in many Buddhist countries known as the ghost festival, during which people dedicate their merits to their ancestors. Maudgalyāyana has also traditionally been associated with meditation and sometimes Abhidharma texts, as well as the Dharmaguptaka school. In the nineteenth century, relics were found attributed to him, which have been widely venerated.
Mahā Kāśyapa or Mahākāśyapa (Pali: Mahākassapa) is regarded in Buddhism as an enlightened disciple, being foremost in ascetic practice. Mahākāśyapa assumed leadership of the monastic community following the paranirvāṇa (death) of the Buddha, presiding over the First Buddhist Council. He was considered to be the first patriarch in a number of early Buddhist schools and continued to have an important role as patriarch in the Chan and Zen tradition. In Buddhist texts, he assumed many identities, that of a renunciant saint, a lawgiver, an anti-establishment figure, but also a "guarantor of future justice" in the time of Maitreya—he has been described as "both the anchorite and the friend of mankind, even of the outcast".
In canonical Buddhist texts in several traditions, Mahākāśyapa was born as Pippali in a brahmin family, and entered an arranged marriage with a woman named Bhadra-Kapilānī. Both of them aspired to lead a celibate life, however, and they decided not to consummate their marriage. Having grown weary of the agricultural profession and the damage it did, they both left the lay life behind to become mendicants. Pippali later met the Buddha, under whom he was ordained as a monk, named Kāśyapa, but later called Mahākāśyapa to distinguish him from other disciples. Mahākāśyapa became an important disciple of the Buddha, to the extent that the Buddha exchanged his robe with him, which was a symbol of the transmittance of the Buddhist teaching. He became foremost in ascetic practices and attained enlightenment shortly after met the Buddha. He often had disputes with Ānanda, the attendant of the Buddha, due to their different dispositions and views. Despite his ascetic, strict and stern reputation, he paid an interest in community matters and teaching, and was known for his compassion for the poor, which sometimes caused him to be depicted as an anti-establishment figure. He had a prominent role in the cremation of the Buddha, acting as a sort of eldest son of the Buddha, as well as being the leader in the subsequent First Council. He is depicted as hesitatingly allowing Ānanda to participate in the council, and chastising him afterwards for a number of offenses the latter was regarded to have committed.
Mahākāśyapa's life as described in the early Buddhist texts has been considerably studied by scholars, who have been skeptical about his role in the cremation, his role toward Ānanda and the historical validity of the council itself. A number of scholars have hypothesized that the accounts have later been embellished to emphasize the values of the Buddhist establishment Mahākāśyapa stood for, emphasizing monastic discipline, brahmin and ascetic values, as opposed to the values of Ānanda and other disciples. Regardless, it is clear that Mahākāśyapa had an important role in the early days of the Buddhist community after the Buddha's parinirvāṇa, to help establish a stable monastic tradition. He effectively became the leader for the first twenty years after the Buddha, as he had become the most influential figure in the monastic community. For this reason, he was regarded by many early Buddhist schools as a sort of first patriarch, and was seen to have started a lineage of patriarchs of Buddhism. This further amplified the idea of him being the primary heir and elder son of the Buddha, which came to be symbolized by the robe Mahākāśyapa had received.
In many post-canonical texts, Mahākāśyapa decided at the end of his life to enter a state of meditation and suspended animation, which was believed to cause his physical remains to stay intact in a cave under a mountain called Kukkuṭapāda, until the coming of Maitreya Buddha in a next age. This story has led to several cults and practices, and affected some Buddhist countries up until early modern times. It has been interpreted by scholars as a narrative to physically connect Gautama Buddha with the next Buddha Maitreya, through the body of Mahākāśyapa and Gautama Buddha's robe, which covered Mahākāśyapa's remains. In Chan Buddhism, this account was less emphasized, but Mahākāśyapa was seen to have received a special mind-to-mind transmission from Gautama Buddha outside of orthodox scripture, which became essential to the identity of Chan. Again, the robe was an important symbol in this transmission. Apart from having a role in texts and lineage, Mahākāśyapa has often been depicted in Buddhist art as a symbol of reassurance and hope for the future of Buddhism.
Subhūti (Sanskrit; Pali: Subhadda) understood the potency of emptiness. He is the disciple foremost of those living remote and in peace (araṇavihārīnaṃ aggo), and of those who were worthy of gifts (dakkhiṇeyyānaṃ). He appears in several Sutras of Mahāyāna Buddhism which teach Śūnyatā (Emptiness or Voidness). He is the subject of the Subhūti Sutta.
Pūrṇa Maitrāyaniputra (Sk.) or Puṇṇa Mantānīputta (Pl.). He was also called Purna for short. He was the greatest teacher of the Law out of all the disciples. He was the top master of preaching.
Kātyāyana or Mahākātyāyana (Sk.) or Mahākaccāna (Pl.). He understood Shakyamuni Buddha's lecture the best. Although he had only five master in the rural areas, he was permitted to learn Vinaya by the Buddha.
Anuruddha (Pl.) or Aniruddha (Sk.) was a top master of clairvoyance and the practice of the four foundations of mindfulness (satipatthana). Aniruddha was a cousin of Shakyamuni Buddha. He and Ananda became monks at the same time.
Upāli (Sanskrit and Pāli) was, according to early Buddhist texts, mainly responsible for the reciting and reviewing monastic discipline (Pāli and Sanskrit: vinaya) on the First Buddhist Council. Upāli was born as a low-caste barber. He met the Buddha when still child, and later, when the Sakya princes received ordination, he did so as well. He was, in fact, ordained before the princes, putting humility before caste. Having ordained, Upāli learnt both Buddhist doctrine (Pali: Dhamma; Sanskrit: Dharma) and vinaya. His preceptor was Kappitaka. Upāli became known for his mastery and strictness of vinaya, and was consulted often about vinaya matters. A notable case he decided about was that of the monk Ajjuka, who was accused of partisanship in a conflict about real estate. During the First Council, Upāli received the important role of reciting the vinaya, for which he is mostly known.
Scholars have analyzed Upāli's role and that of other disciples in the early texts, and it has been suggested that his role in the texts was emphasized during a period of compiling that stressed monastic discipline, during which Mahākassapa (Sanskrit: Mahākāśyapa) and Upāli became the most important disciples. Later, Upāli and his pupils became known as vinayadharas (Pāli; 'custodians of the vinaya'), who preserved the monastic discipline after the Buddha's parinibbāna (Sanskrit: parinirvāṇa; passing into final Nirvana). This lineage became an important part of the identity of Ceylonese and Burmese Buddhism. In China, the 7th-century Vinaya school referred to Upāli as their patriarch and it was believed that one of their founders was a reincarnation of him. The technical conversations about vinaya between the Buddha and Upāli were recorded in the Pāli and Sarvāstivāda traditions, and have been suggested as an important subject of study for modern-day ethics in American Buddhism.
Rāhula (Pāli and Sanskrit) was the only son of Siddhārtha Gautama, and his wife and princess Yaśodharā. He is mentioned in numerous Buddhist texts, from the early period onward. Accounts about Rāhula indicate a mutual impact between Prince Siddhārtha's life and those of his family members. According to the Pāli tradition, Rāhula is born on the day of Prince Siddhārta's renunciation, and is therefore named Rāhula, meaning a fetter on the path to enlightenment. According to the Mūlasarvāstivāda tradition, and numerous other later sources, however, Rāhula is only conceived on the day of Prince Siddhārtha, and is born six years later, when Prince Siddhārtha becomes enlightened as the Buddha. This long gestation period is explained by bad karma from previous lives of both Yaśodharā and of Rāhula himself, although more naturalistic reasons are also given. As a result of the late birth, Yaśodharā needs to prove that Rāhula is really Prince Siddhārtha's son, which she eventually does successfully by an act of truth. Historian Wolfgang Schumann has argued that Prince Siddhārtha conceived Rāhula and waited for his birth, to be able to leave the palace with the king and queen's permission, but Orientalist Noël Péri considered it more likely that Rāhula was born after Prince Siddhārtha left his palace.
Between seven and fifteen years after Rāhula is born, the Buddha returns to Kapilavastu, where Yaśodharā has Rāhula ask the Buddha for the throne of the Śākya clan. The Buddha responds by having Rāhula ordain as the first Buddhist novice monk. He teaches the young novice about truth, self-reflection, and not-self, eventually leading to Rāhula's enlightenment. Although early accounts state that Rāhula dies before the Buddha does, later tradition has it that Rāhula is one of the disciples that outlives the Buddha, guarding the Buddha's Dispensation until the rising of the next Buddha. Rāhula is known in Buddhist texts for his eagerness for learning, and was honored by novice monks and nuns throughout Buddhist history. His accounts have led to a perspective in Buddhism of seeing children as hindrances to the spiritual life on the one hand, and as people with potential for enlightenment on the other hand.
Ānanda was the primary attendant of the Buddha and one of his ten principal disciples. Among the Buddha's many disciples, Ānanda stood out for having the best memory. Most of the texts of the early Buddhist Sutta-Piṭaka (Pāli; Sanskrit: Sūtra-Piṭaka) are attributed to his recollection of the Buddha's teachings during the First Buddhist Council. For that reason, he is known as the "Treasurer of the Dhamma", with Dhamma (Sanskrit: Dharma) referring to the Buddha's teaching. In Early Buddhist Texts, Ānanda is the first cousin of the Buddha. Although the texts do not agree on most things about Ānanda's early life, they do agree that Ānanda is ordained as a monk and that Puṇṇa Mantāniputta (Sanskrit: Pūrṇa Maitrāyaṇīputra) becomes his teacher. Twenty years in the Buddha's ministry, Ānanda becomes the attendant of the Buddha, when the Buddha selects him for this job. Ānanda performs his duties with great devotion and care, and acts as an intermediary between the Buddha and the laypeople, as well as the Saṅgha (monastic community). He accompanies the Buddha for the rest of his life, acting not only as an assistant, but also a secretary and a mouthpiece.
Scholars are skeptical about the historicity of many events in Ānanda's life, especially the First Council, and consensus about this has yet to be established. A traditional account can be drawn from early texts, commentaries, and post-canonical chronicles. Ānanda has an important role in establishing the order of bhikkhunis, when he requests the Buddha on behalf of the latter's foster-mother Mahāpajāpati Gotamī (Sanskrit: Mahāprajāpatī Gautamī) to allow her to be ordained. Ānanda also accompanies the Buddha in the last year of his life, and therefore is witness to many tenets and principles that the Buddha conveys and establishes before his death, including the well-known principle that the Buddhist community should take his teaching and discipline as their refuge, and that the Buddha will not appoint a new leader. The final period of the Buddha's life also shows that Ānanda is still very much attached to the Buddha's person, and he witnesses the Buddha's passing with great sorrow.
Shortly after the Buddha's death, the First Council is convened, and Ānanda manages to attain enlightenment just before the council starts, which is a requirement. He has a historical role during the council as the living memory of the Buddha, reciting many of the Buddha's discourses and checking them for accuracy. During the same council, however, he is chastised by Mahākassapa (Sanskrit: Mahākāśyapa) and the rest of the Saṅgha for allowing women to be ordained and failing to understand or respect the Buddha at several crucial moments. Ānanda continues to teach until the end of his life, passing on his spiritual heritage to his pupils Sāṇavāsī (Sanskrit: Śāṇakavāsī) and Majjhantika (Sanskrit: Madhyāntika), among others, who later assume a leading role in the Second and Third Councils. Ānanda dies in 463 BCE, and stūpas (monuments) are erected at the river where he dies.
Ānanda is one of the most loved figures in Buddhism. Ānanda is known for his memory, erudition and compassion, and is often praised by the Buddha for these matters. He functions as a foil to the Buddha, however, in that he still has worldly attachments and is not yet enlightened, as opposed to the Buddha. In the Sanskrit textual traditions, Ānanda is widely considered the patriarch of the Dhamma, who stands in a spiritual lineage, receiving the teaching from Mahākassapa and passing them on to his own pupils. Ānanda has been honored by bhikkhunis since early medieval times for his merits in establishing the nun's order. In recent times, the composer Richard Wagner wrote a draft for a libretto about Ānanda, which was made into the opera Wagner Dream by Jonathan Harvey in 2007.
In the Pāli text Udāna, a similar list is mentioned, but these are eleven not ten disciples, and five in the list are different. Although in the early Sanskrit and Chinese texts, there are only four enlightened disciples, in later tradition there are eight enlightened disciples (found in the Mañjuśrī-mūla-kalpa; there still are in the Burmese tradition), sixteen (in Chinese and Tibetan texts) and then eighteen disciples (in Chinese texts). There is also a Chinese tradition with five hundred disciples.
|No.||Mañjuśrī-mūla-kalpa||Mahāyāna discourses||Pāli discourses|
- Tambiah 1984, p. 22.
- Nishijima & Cross 2008, p. 32 note 119.
- Keown 2004, p. 298.
- Mather 1968, p. 72 note 34.
- Silk 2019, p. 410.
- Hecker & Nyanaponika Thera 2003, p. 376-377.
- Silk 2019, p. 413.
- Silk 2019, p. 416.
- Silk 2019, p. 416-417.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, p. 1904.
- Silk 2019, p. 411.
- Hecker & Nyanaponika Thera 2003, p. 31-32,57.
- Daulton 1999, p. 104.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, p. 1903.
- Hecker & Nyanaponika Thera 2003, p. 56-57.
- Migot 1954, p. 407,462-463.
- Hecker & Nyanaponika Thera 2003, p. 68-69.
- Migot 1954, p. 471.
- Silk 2019, p. 414.
- Migot 1954, p. 473-474.
- Silk 2019, p. 414-415.
- Brekke 2007, p. 275.
- Daulton 1999, p. 105-106.
- Ray 1994, p. 131-133.
- Malalasekera 1937.
- Hecker & Nyanaponika Thera 2003, p. 65.
- Krey 2010, p. 19.
- Migot 1954, p. 426.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, p. 77.
- Skilling 2003, p. 273.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, p. 499.
- Migot 1954, pp. 433, 475.
- Migot 1954, pp. 407, 416–417.
- Gethin 2011, p. 222.
- Mrozik 2004, p. 487, Mahāmaudgalyāyana.
- Brown 2013, p. 371.
- Harvey 2013, p. 262–263.
- Strong 1994.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, pp. 7, 245, 252.
- Migot 1954, p. 416.
- Ray 1994, p. 117.
- Rhys Davids 1914, p. 160.
- Karaluvinna 2002, p. 435.
- Clarke 2014, pp. 110–112.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, Bhadra-Kapilānī.
- Clarke 2014, p. 112.
- Sanvido 2017, p. 343.
- Clarke 2014, p. 107.
- Ray 1994, p. 106.
- Ohnuma 2013, pp. 51, 57, 59.
- Analayo 2010, pp. 17–19.
- Wilson 2003, p. 57.
- Ray 1994, p. 110.
- Strong 1994, pp. 62, 115.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, Mahākāśyapa.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, Council, 1st.
- Bareau 1979, pp. 74–75.
- Findly 1992, p. 254.
- Prebish 2005, p. 226.
- Migot 1954, pp. 540–541.
- Findly 1992, p. 253.
- Ray 1994, pp. 114, 117–118, 396.
- Heim 2004, p. 468.
- Hirakawa 1993, pp. 84–85.
- Morrison 2010, p. 23.
- Adamek 2011, Bodhidharma's Robe.
- Tournier 2014, pp. 17–18, note 62, 20–22, note 78.
- Strong 2007, pp. 45–46.
- Ray 1994, pp. 114–115.
- Deeg 1999, p. 168.
- Silk 2003, pp. 200, 207.
- Faure 1995, pp. 339–340.
- Hershock, P. (2019). "Chan Buddhism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 11 September 2019.
- Kim 2011, p. 137.
- Irons 2008, p. 162.
- Eliade 1982, pp. 210–211.
- Gombrich 1995, p. 357.
- Bareau 1962, p. 262.
- Malalasekera 1937, Upāli.
- Malalasekera 1937, Upāli; Upāli Sutta (3).
- Freedman 1977, p. 58.
- Mrozik 2004, Upāli.
- Baroni 2002, p. 365.
- Huxley 2010, p. 278.
- Przyluski 1932, pp. 22–23. sfn error: no target: CITEREFPrzyluski1932 (help)
- Frasch 1996, pp. 2–4, 12, 14.
- Hsiang-Kuang 1956, p. 207.
- Bapat 1956, pp. 126–127.
- Norman 1983, p. 29.
- Prebish 2000, pp. 56–57.
- Meeks 2016, p. 139. sfn error: no target: CITEREFMeeks2016 (help)
- Strong 1997, pp. 122–4.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, Rāhula.
- Saddhasena 2003, p. 481. sfn error: no target: CITEREFSaddhasena2003 (help)
- Strong 1997, p. 119.
- Meeks 2016, pp. 139–40. sfn error: no target: CITEREFMeeks2016 (help)
- Strong 1997, p. 120.
- Schumann 2004, p. 46. sfn error: no target: CITEREFSchumann2004 (help)
- Péri 1918, pp. 34–5. sfn error: no target: CITEREFPéri1918 (help)
- Crosby 2013, p. 110. sfn error: no target: CITEREFCrosby2013 (help)
- Crosby 2013, p. 115. sfn error: no target: CITEREFCrosby2013 (help)
- Saddhasena 2003, pp. 482–3. sfn error: no target: CITEREFSaddhasena2003 (help)
- Crosby 2013, p. 116. sfn error: no target: CITEREFCrosby2013 (help)
- Strong 1997, p. 121.
- Malalasekera 1937, Rāhula.
- Meeks 2016, passim.. sfn error: no target: CITEREFMeeks2016 (help)
- Nakagawa 2005, p. 41. sfn error: no target: CITEREFNakagawa2005 (help)
- Nishijima & Cross, p. 32 n.119. sfn error: no target: CITEREFNishijimaCross (help)
- Mun-keat 2000, p. 142.
- Powers 2013, Ānanda.
- Sarao 2004, p. 49, Ānanda.
- Witanachchi 1965, p. 530. sfn error: no target: CITEREFWitanachchi1965 (help)
- Keown 2004, p. 12.
- Malalasekera 1937, Ānanda.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, Ānanda.
- Findly 2003, p. 377.
- Prebish 2005, pp. 226, 231.
- Mukherjee 1994, p. 457.
- Ohnuma 2006, pp. 862, 872.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, Mahāparinibbānasuttanta.
- Obeyesekere 2017, The Death of the Buddha: A Restorative Interpretation.
- Strong 1977, pp. 398–399.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, Ānanda; Īryāpatha.
- Keown 2004, p. 164.
- von Hinüber 2007, p. 235–236.
- Witanachchi 1965, pp. 534–5. sfn error: no target: CITEREFWitanachchi1965 (help)
- Hirakawa 1993.
- Bechert 2005, p. 69.
- Lamotte 1988, pp. 93, 210.
- Sarao 2004, Ānanda.
- One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Rhys Davids, Thomas William (1911). "Ānanda". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 1 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 913.
- Shaw 2006, p. 115.
- Buswell & Lopez 2013, Damoduoluo chan jing; Madhyāntika.
- Ambros 2016, pp. 209–212, 214, 216–218, 245–246.
- App 2011, pp. 42–43.
- Ray 1994, p. 162.
- Ray 1994, pp. 205 note 2b.
- Strong 1997, pp. 121–122.
- Tambiah (1984, p. 23) and Lamotte (1988), the latter cited in Ray (1994, pp. 205–206 note 2a–d).
- Ray 1994, p. 179.
- Adamek, W.L. (2011), The Teachings of Master Wuzhu: Zen and Religion of No-Religion, Columbia University Press, ISBN 978-0-231-52792-7
- Ambros, B.R. (27 June 2016), "A Rite of Their Own: Japanese Buddhist Nuns and the Anan kōshiki", Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 43 (1), doi:10.18874/jjrs.43.1.2016.207-250
- Analayo, B. (2010), "Once Again on Bakkula", The Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies, 11: 1–28
- App, U. (2011), Richard Wagner and Buddhism, UniversityMedia, ISBN 978-3-906000-00-8
- Bapat, P. (1956), 2500 Years of Buddhism, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (India), OCLC 851201287
- Bareau, A. (1962), "La construction et le culte des stūpa d'après les Vinayapiṭaka" [The Construction and Cult of the Stūpa after the Vinayapiṭaka] (PDF), Bulletin de l'École française d'Extrême-Orient (in French), 50 (2): 229–274
- Bareau, A. (1979), "III. La composition et les étapes de la formation progressive du Mahàparinirvânasûtra ancien" [3. The Composition and the Episodes of the Progressive Formation of the ancient Mahāparinirvānasūtra], Bulletin de l'École française d'Extrême-Orient (in French), 66 (1): 45–103, doi:10.3406/befeo.1979.4010
- Baroni, H.J. (2002), The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Zen Buddhism, Rosen Publishing Group, ISBN 978-0-8239-2240-6
- Bechert, H. (2005) , "The Date of the Buddha Reconsidered", in Williams, P. (ed.), Buddhism: Critical Concepts in Religious Studies, 1: Early History in South and Southeast Asia, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-33227-3
- Brekke, Torkel (2007-01-01), "Bones of Contention: Buddhist Relics, Nationalism and the Politics of Archaeology", Numen, 54 (3): 270–303, doi:10.1163/156852707X211564, ISSN 1568-5276
- Brown, F.B., ed. (2013), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and the Arts, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-972103-0
- Buswell, R.E. Jr.; Lopez, D.S. Jr. (2013), Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-15786-3
- Clarke, S. (2014), Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms, University of Hawai'i Press, ISBN 978-0-8248-3647-4
- Daulton, J. (1999), "Sariputta and Moggallana in the Golden Land: The Relics of the Buddha's Chief Disciples at the Kaba Aye Pagoda" (PDF), Journal of Burma Studies, 4 (1): 101–128, doi:10.1353/jbs.1999.0002
- Deeg, M. (1999), "Das Ende des Dharma und die Ankunft des Maitreya" [The End of the Dharma and the Coming of Maitreya], Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft (in German), 7 (2): 145–170, doi:10.1515/0031.145
- Eliade, M. (1982), Histoire des croyances et des idees religieuses. Vol. 2: De Gautama Bouddha au triomphe du christianisme [A history of religious ideas: From Gautama Buddha to the Triumph of Christianity] (in French), University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0-226-20403-0
- Faure, B. (1995), "Quand l'habit fait le moine: The Symbolism of the Kāsāya in Sōtō zen", Cahiers d'Extrême-Asie, 8 (1): 335–369, doi:10.3406/asie.1995.1101
- Findly, E.B. (September 1992), "Ānanda's Hindrance: Faith (saddhā) in Early Buddhism", Journal of Indian Philosophy, 20 (3): 253–273, doi:10.1007/BF00157758
- Findly, E.B. (2003), Dāna: Giving and Getting in Pāli Buddhism, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, ISBN 9788120819566
- Frasch, T. (1996), "An Eminent Buddhist Tradition: The Burmese Vinayadharas", Traditions in Current Perspective
- Freedman, M. (June 1977), The Characterization of Ānanda in the Pāli Canon of the Theravāda: A Hagiographic Study (PhD thesis), McMaster University
- Gethin, R. (2011), "Tales of Miraculous Teachings: Miracles in Early Indian Buddhism", in Twelftree, G.H. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Miracles, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-89986-4
- Gombrich, R.F. (1995), Buddhist Precept and Practice: Traditional Buddhism in the Rural Highlands of Ceylon, Kegan Paul, Trench and Company, ISBN 978-0-7103-0444-5
- Harvey, P. (2013), An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-85942-4
- Hecker, Hellmuth; Nyanaponika Thera (2003), Great Disciples of the Buddha: Their Lives, Their Works, Their Legacy (PDF), Simon and Schuster, ISBN 978-0-86171-381-3
- Heim, M. (2004), "Kassapa", in Jestice, P.G. (ed.), Holy People of the World: A Cross-cultural Encyclopedia, ABC-CLIO, pp. 467–468, ISBN 1-85109-649-3
- von Hinüber, O. (5 November 2007), "The Advent of the First Nuns in Early Buddhism" (PDF), Indogaku Chibettogaku Kenkyū [Journal of Indian and Tibetan Studies], Association for the Study of Indian Philosophy: 222–237, ISSN 1342-7377, archived from the original (PDF) on 10 September 2018, retrieved 23 September 2018
- Hirakawa, A. (1993), A History of Indian Buddhism: From Śākyamuni to Early Mahāyāna, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, ISBN 9788120809550
- Hsiang-Kuang, C. (1956), A History of Chinese Buddhism, Indo-Chinese Literature Publications, OCLC 553968893
- Huxley, A. (23 June 2010), "Hpo Hlaing on Buddhist Law", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 73 (2): 269–283, doi:10.1017/S0041977X10000364
- Irons, E. (2008), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Facts on File, ISBN 978-0-8160-5459-6
- Karaluvinna, M. (2002), "Mahākassapa", in Malalasekera, G.P.; Weeraratne, W.G. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Buddhism, 6, Government of Sri Lanka, fascicle 3, pp. 435–441
- Keown, D. (2004), A Dictionary of Buddhism, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-157917-2
- Kim, S. (2011), "Awakened, Awaiting, or Meditating?: Readdressing a Silla Period Image from the Buddha Valley on Mount Nam", Journal of Korean Studies, 16 (1): 119–150, doi:10.1353/jks.2011.0002
- Krey, Gisela (2010-09-04), "On Women as Teachers in Early Buddhism: Dhammadinnā and Khemā", Buddhist Studies Review, 27 (1), doi:10.1558/bsrv.v27i1.17, ISSN 0265-2897
- Lamotte, E. (1988) , Histoire du Bouddhisme Indien, des origines a l'ere Saka [History of Indian Buddhism: From the Origins to the Śaka Era] (in French), Université catholique de Louvain, Institut orientaliste, ISBN 90-683-1-100-X
- Malalasekera, G.P. (1937), Dictionary of Pāli Proper Names, Pali Text Society, OCLC 837021145
- Mather, R.B. (1968), "Vimalakīrti and Gentry Buddhism", History of Religions, 8 (1): 60–73
- Migot, A. (1954), "Un grand disciple du Buddha: Sāriputra. Son rôle dans l'histoire du bouddhisme et dans le développement de l'Abhidharma" [A great disciple of the Buddha: Sāriputra, his role in Buddhist history and in the development of Abhidharma] (PDF), Bulletin de l'École française d'Extrême-Orient (in French), 46 (2), doi:10.3406/befeo.1954.5607
- Morrison, E. (2010), The Power of Patriarchs: Qisong and Lineage in Chinese Buddhism, Brill Publishing, ISBN 978-90-04-18301-8
- Mrozik, S. (2004), "Mahāmaudgalyāyana; Upāli", in Buswell, Robert E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, 1–2, Macmillan Reference USA, Thomson Gale, pp. 487–488, 870–871, ISBN 0-02-865720-9
- Mukherjee, B. (1994), "The Riddle of the First Buddhist Council – A Retrospection", Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal, 7
- Mun-keat, C. (2000), The Fundamental Teachings of Early Buddhism: A Comparative Study Based on the Sūtrāṅga Portion of the Pāli Saṃyutta-Nikāya and the Chinese Saṃyuktāgama, Harrassowitz, ISBN 3-447-04232-X
- Nishijima, G.W.; Cross, S. (2008), Shōbōgenzō : The True Dharma-Eye Treasury (PDF), Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research, ISBN 978-1-886439-38-2, archived (PDF) from the original on 2 August 2017
- Norman, K.R. (1983), Pali Literature, Otto Harrassowitz, ISBN 3-447-02285-X
- Obeyesekere, G. (2017), "The Death of the Buddha: A Restorative Interpretation", The Buddha in Sri Lanka: Histories and Stories, Taylor & Francis, ISBN 978-1-351-59225-3
- Ohnuma, R. (December 2006), "Debt to the Mother: A Neglected Aspect of the Founding of the Buddhist Nuns' Order", Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 74 (4), doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfl026
- Ohnuma, R. (2013), "Bad Nun: Thullanandā in Pāli Canonical and Commentarial Sources" (PDF), Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 20, archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2018
- Powers, J. (2013), A Concise Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Oneworld Publications, ISBN 978-1-78074-476-6
- Prebish, C.S. (2000), "From Monastic Ethics to Modern Society", in Keown, D. (ed.), Contemporary Buddhist Ethics, Curzon, pp. 37–56, ISBN 0-7007-1278-X
- Prebish, Charles S. (2005) , "Review of Scholarship on Buddhist Councils", in Williams, Paul (ed.), Buddhism: Critical Concepts in Religious Studies, 1: Early History in South and Southeast Asia, Routledge, pp. 224–243, ISBN 0-415-33227-3
- Przyluski, J. (1926), Le concile de Rājagṛha: introduction à l'histoire des canons et des sects bouddhiques [The Council of Rājagṛha: Introduction to the History of the Buddhist Canons and Schools] (PDF) (in French), Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner, OCLC 2753753
- Ray, R.A. (1994), Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-507202-2
- Rhys Davids, C.A.F. (1914), "Love (Buddhist)" (PDF), in Hastings, James; Selbie, John Alexander; Gray, Louis H. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, 8, T. & T. Clark, pp. 159–162, OCLC 614111002
- Sanvido, M. (2017), "Multiple Layers of Transmission: Gasan Jōseki and the Goi Doctrine in the Medieval Sōtō school" (PDF), Annali di Ca' Foscari. Serie Orientale, 53, doi:10.14277/2385-3042/AnnOr-53-17-12, ISSN 2385-3042, archived (PDF) from the original on 16 November 2019
- Sarao, K.T.S. (2004), "Ānanda", in Jestice, P.G. (ed.), Holy People of the World, ABC-CLIO, p. 49, ISBN 1-85109-649-3
- Shaw, S. (2006), Buddhist Meditation: An Anthology of Texts from the Pāli Canon, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-35918-4
- Silk, J.A. (2003), "Dressed for Success: The Monk Kāśyapa and Strategies of Legitimation in Earlier Mahāyāna Buddhist Scriptures" (PDF), Journal asiatique, 291 (1–2): 173–219, archived (PDF) from the original on 17 February 2020
- Silk, Jonathan A. (2019), Brill's encyclopedia of Buddhism Vol Two, Hinüber, Oskar von,, Eltschinger, Vincent,, Bowring, Richard, 1947-, Radich, Michael, Leiden, ISBN 978-90-04-29937-5, OCLC 909251257
- Skilling, P. (2003), "Traces of the Dharma", Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient, 90–91: 273–287, doi:10.3406/befeo.2003.3615
- Strong, J.S. (1977), ""Gandhakuṭī": The Perfumed Chamber of the Buddha", History of Religions, 16 (4), doi:10.2307/1062638, JSTOR 1062638
- Strong, J.S. (1994), The Legend and Cult of Upagupta: Sanskrit Buddhism in North India and Southeast Asia, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, ISBN 9788120811546
- Strong, J.S. (1997), "A Family Quest: The Buddha, Yaśodharā, and Rāhula in the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya", in Schober, Juliane (ed.), Sacred Biography in the Buddhist Traditions of South and Southeast Asia, pp. 113–28, ISBN 978-0-8248-1699-5
- Strong, J.S. (2007), Relics of the Buddha, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-11764-5
- Tambiah, S.J. (1984), The Buddhist Saints of the Forest and the Cult of Amulets: A Study in Charisma, Hagiography, Sectarianism, and Millennial Buddhism, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-27787-7
- Tournier, V. (2014), "Mahākāśyapa, His Lineage, and the Wish for Buddhahood: Reading Anew the Bodhgayā Inscriptions of Mahānāman" (PDF), Indo-Iranian Journal, 57 (1–2): 1–60, doi:10.1163/15728536-05701001, archived (PDF) from the original on 21 September 2017
- Wilson, L. (2003), "Beggars Can Be Choosers: Mahākassapa as a Selective Eater of Offerings", in Holt, J.; Kinnard, J.N.; Walters, J.S. (eds.), Constituting Communities, Theravāda Buddhism and the Religious Cultures of South and Southeast Asia, pp. 57–70, ISBN 978-0-7914-8705-1