From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Teorema (film))
Teorema film Pier Paolo Pasolini xlg.jpg
Film poster
Directed byPier Paolo Pasolini
Written byPier Paolo Pasolini
Produced byManolo Bolognini
Franco Rossellini
StarringTerence Stamp
Laura Betti
Silvana Mangano
Massimo Girotti
Anne Wiazemsky
Ninetto Davoli
CinematographyGiuseppe Ruzzolini
Edited byNino Baragli
Music byEnnio Morricone
Aetos Produzioni Cinematografiche
Distributed byEuro International Film
Release dates
  • 4 September 1968 (1968-09-04) (Venice)
  • 7 September 1968 (1968-09-07) (Italy)
Running time
98 minutes[1]

Teorema, also known as Theorem (UK), is a 1968 Italian allegorical film written and directed by Pier Paolo Pasolini and starring Terence Stamp, Laura Betti, Silvana Mangano, Massimo Girotti and Anne Wiazemsky. Pasolini's sixth film, it was the first time he worked primarily with professional actors. In this film, an upper-class Milanese family is introduced to, and then abandoned by, a divine force. Themes include the timelessness of divinity and the spiritual corruption of the bourgeoisie.


A mysterious figure known only as "The Visitor" appears in the lives of a typical bourgeois Italian family. His arrival is heralded at the gates of the family's Milanese estate by an arm-flapping postman. The enigmatic stranger soon engages in sexual affairs with all members of the household: the devoutly religious maid, the sensitive son, the sexually repressed mother, the timid daughter and, finally, the tormented father. The stranger gives unstintingly of himself, asking nothing in return. He stops the passionate maid from committing suicide with a gas hose and tenderly consoles her; he befriends and sleeps with the frightened son, soothing his doubts and anxiety and endowing him with confidence; he becomes emotionally intimate with the overprotected daughter, removing her childish innocence about men; he seduces the bored and dissatisfied mother, giving her sexual joy and fulfillment; he cares for and comforts the despondent and suffering father, who has fallen ill.

Then one day the herald returns and announces that the stranger will soon leave the household, just as suddenly and mysteriously as he came. In the subsequent void of the stranger's absence, each family member is forced to confront what was previously concealed by the trappings of bourgeois life. The maid returns to the rural village where she was born and is seen to perform miracles; ultimately, she immolates herself by having her body buried in dirt while shedding ecstatic tears of regeneration. The mother seeks sexual encounters with young men; the son leaves the family home to become an artist; the daughter sinks into a catatonic state; and the father strips himself of all material effects, handing his factory over to its workers, removing his clothes at a railway station and wandering naked into the wilderness, where he finally screams in primal rage and despair.

It has been cited, incorrectly, as being remade as "Down and Out In Beverly Hills." Though there are similar themes, the latter is inspired by a much older stage play from around 1932.


Terence Stamp as The Visitor


On its release, the religious right and the Vatican criticized the sexual content in the film. Others considered the film "ambiguous" and "visionary". The film won a special award at the Venice Film Festival from the International Catholic Film Office, only for the award to be withdrawn later when the Vatican protested.[2][3]

Scholars view the film differently due to the openness or ambiguity of the film. The author of A Certain Realism: Making Use of Pasolini’s Film Theory and Practice, Maurizio Viano, says that in order to understand the film there must be "adequate translation". Most scholars writing about the film do not discuss Pasolini's cinematographic techniques but Pasolini's philosophical arguments. Viano argues that Pasolini intended to be theoretical in this film because he wanted to be recognized as "a film theorist".

Structure and title etymology[edit]

Teorema means theorem in Italian. Its Greek root is theorema (θεώρημα), meaning simultaneously "spectacle", "intuition", and "theorem". Viano suggests that the film should be considered as "spectatorship" because each family member gazes at the guest and his loins[citation needed], although this seems unlikely: the Greek word denotes the object of spectatorship, rather than the actual act of spectatorship, which would be theoresis (θεώρησις).

As a term, theorem is also often considered as mathematical or formulaic. In this sense, the film also contains a programmatic structure. It begins with documentary-like images and then moves on to the opening credit with a dark volcanic desert, a home party scene, cuts of the factory in sepia tone, introduction of each family member in silence and sepia tone, and, then, the guest sitting in the back yard in colour. The middle section is divided into three: "seductions", "confessions" and "transformations".[4]

Not only is the film's structure formulaic but so is the psychological development of each character. They all go through "seductions", "confessions" and "transformations". The way each character changes their state of mind is the same. They all fall into a sexual desire for the guest. They all have sex with him. When the guest leaves, they all, except the maid, confess to him how they feel about themselves. In the final section of the film, after he leaves, they lose the identities they previously possessed. The maid goes back to her village and performs miracles while subsisting on nettles, but asks to be buried alive. The daughter falls into a catatonic state. The son maniacally paints his desire for the guest. The mother picks up young men who resemble the guest and has sex with them. The father strips naked in the middle of the train station.

Scholarly interpretations[edit]

A common interpretation by cinema scholars is that the film is a commentary on the bourgeois society and emergence of consumerism through the very beginning of the film. The reporter asks a worker at Paolo's factory if he thinks there will be no bourgeois in the future. In The Cinema of Economic Miracles: Visuality and Modernization in the Italian Art Film, Angelo Restivo assumes that Pasolini suggests that even documentary images, which depict facts, fail to show the truth. News can tell the audience only the surface of the events they broadcast. Merely watching the interview of the workers does not tell why factory owner Paolo, gave away the factory. That might be one of the reasons the scene is set in the beginning of the film.[citation needed]

In his biographical work on Pasolini, Pier Paolo Pasolini, Enzo Siciliano assumes that Pasolini expresses his struggle of being homosexual in the film. On the other hand, Viano believes that Pasolini's emphasis is not on homosexuality but rather on sexuality in general, because the guest has sex with each member of the household. Sexuality is considered as passion in Viano's interpretation.[citation needed]

Italian critic Morandini, author of a dictionary of cinema, claimed that "the theorem is demonstrated: the incapacity of modern -bourgeois- man to perceive, listen to, absorb and live the sacred. Only Emilia the servant, who comes from a peasant family, discovers it and, after the 'miracle' of levitation, will return to the ground with a holy smell. It's another film by Pasolini dedicated to the conjunction between Marx and Freud (and, here, Jung and Marcuse too)."[5]

Other versions[edit]

The same year, Pasolini expanded this film into a novel with the same name,[6] written simultaneously to the film's production. Giorgio Battistelli composed an opera based on the film. In 2009, Dutch theatre company 'Toneelgroep Amsterdam' created and performed a play version of this movie.

The sketch comedy program Mr. Show aired a segment (series three, episode six) in which a suburban family is slowly revealed, over time, to have all individually had sexual affairs with David Cross, possibly in reference to the film.

Home media[edit]

On October 4, 2005, Koch-Lorber Films released the DVD of Teorema in the United States.[7]

On February 18, 2020, The Criterion Collection released a Blu-ray and DVD of Teorema in North America.[8]



  1. ^ "THEOREM (X)". British Board of Film Classification. 1969-03-12. Retrieved 2013-03-16.
  2. ^ Roger Ebert (1969-05-26). "Teorema". Retrieved 2021-02-13. Some will say "Teorema" is about Christ too. That was the prevailing theory last year at the Venice Film Festival, when "Teorema" won the International Catholic Jury grand award. But that was not the theory at the Vatican, which attacked the award in an official statement.
  3. ^ "Catholic Film Unit Withdraws Award Given to 'Teorama'". The New York Times. 1969-03-28. Retrieved 2021-02-13. The Roman Catholic Church's film-reviewing body, the Office Catholique International du Cinema, has withdrawn the award it gave at the Venice Film Festival last September to the Italian drama "Teorema."
  4. ^ Pier Paolo Pasolini: Contemporary Perspectives by Patrick Allen Rumble, Bart Testa, p. 200
  5. ^ "Teorema". Morandini Film Dictionary. Sky Cinema. Retrieved June 16, 2017.
  6. ^ "Theorem".
  7. ^ Searchable catalogue index for finding details of the DVD for Teorema at Koch Lorber Films.
  8. ^ "Teorema".
  9. ^ Lucas, Tim (2007). Mario Bava: All the Colors of the Dark. Video Watchdog. p. 778. ISBN 978-0-9633756-1-2.


  • Restivo, Angelo. The Cinema of Economic Miracles: Visuality and Modernization in the Italian Arts Film. Durham, NC / London: Duke University Press, 2002.
  • Siciliano, Enzo. Pier Paolo Pasolini. New York: Random House, Inc., 1982. ISBN 9780394522999.
  • Testa, Bart. "To Film a Gospel … and Advent of the Theoretical Stranger", 180–209 in Pier Paolo Pasolini: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Patrick Rumble and Bart Testa. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994.
  • Viano, Maurizio S. A Certain Realism: Making Use of Pasolini's Film Theory and Practice. Berkeley, CA / Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993. ISBN 9780520078543.

External links[edit]