The Bouvier Affair

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Bouvier Affair is the name that art commentators have given to a number of international lawsuits that started in 2015, and subsequent events. The lawsuits allege that Swiss art shipper and dealer Yves Bouvier defrauded his clients by misrepresenting the original cost of art works and subsequently overcharging them. The affair has played out in courts in Monaco, Switzerland, France, the US, Hong Kong and Singapore.

Yves Bouvier

The alleged victims are "high net worth individuals" in the UK, the US, Asia and Europe, most notably Monaco-based Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev.[1]

As of early 2018, Bouvier was facing criminal charges in France, Monaco and also in Switzerland after the Geneva Prosecutor opened a new case there. [2]

Background to the Bouvier Affair[edit]

Prior fraud allegations[edit]

Before 2015, Bouvier was primarily known in the market as an art transporter and curator through his company, Natural Le Coultre, and as a major shareholder and promoter of the Freeport concept.

Lorette Shefner[edit]

In 2008, he became embroiled in a legal case involving Lorette Shefner, a Canadian collector. Shefner’s family claims that she was the victim of a complex fraud, whereby she was persuaded to sell a Soutine painting at a price far below market value, only to see the work later sold to the National Gallery of Art in Washington DC for a much higher price.[3][4] Although not the primary defendant, court documents from 2013 accuse Bouvier of having acted "in concert" with several experts "to disguise the true ownership" of pieces of art in order defraud the Shefner estate.[5]

Wolfgang Beltracchi forgery scandal[edit]

In 2013, it was revealed that Bouvier was implicated in the notorious case of Wolfgang Beltracchi, a German forger who was convicted in 2011 of having defrauded a number of collectors, including Daniel Filipacchi, of millions of dollars.[6] According to German daily Die Zeit, Bouvier founded in 2008 Galerie Jacques de la Béraudière together with art dealer Jacques de la Béraudière, who played a key role in the Beltracchi scandal.[7] This and his ownership of an off-shore entity called Diva Fine Arts led to Bouvier also being connected to the Beltracchi case. He has, however, always denied any connection to Beltracchi and dismissed media coverage as uninformed speculation.[8]

Catherine Hutin-Blay[edit]

In March 2015, Catherine Hutin-Blay, the step daughter of Pablo Picasso from his second wife Jacqueline, filed a complaint alleging that 58 separate works had been stolen from her. Hutin-Blay alleged that the works were stolen from a store in a suburb of Paris that is run by Art Transit, a Bouvier family company.[9][10] It later emerged that Bouvier had sold two of the allegedly stolen Picasso paintings to Rybolovlev in 2013.[11] Rybolovlev handed over the paintings to French authorities in 2015.[12]

Bouvier denied any involvement in the thefts, but in September 2015 he was formally indicted by French authorities on charges of theft in relation to the discovery of two of the works by Picasso that Hutin-Blay alleged were stolen from her.[13] In court, Bouvier produced a document meant to certify that he paid Hutin-Blay for the two paintings, to the tune of $8 million, to a fund in Liechtenstein.[14] Hutin-Blay has disputed this, arguing that the payment concerned a matter unrelated to the thefts.[14]

Following several rounds of interviews with lawyers in Geneva, the case was initially dismissed in 2015,[15] but reopened in 2016 as Bouvier’s associate Olivier Thomas came under renewed scrutiny.[16]

Allegations of money laundering[edit]

In late 2015, it emerged that Bouvier has been investigated by the authorities in Liechtenstein on suspicion of money laundering, in one instance related to a forged Max Ernst work, that is alleged to have been created by Wolfgang Beltracchi. However, Liechtenstein suspended its investigation in December 2015.[15]

In September 2017, Bouvier was under criminal investigation by Swiss authorities amid allegations that he may have evaded more than 100 million Euros in taxes related to his cross-border art dealings.[17]


The Hutin-Blay case coincided with a separate case involving allegations made by Rybolovlev that forms the main part of the Yves Bouvier Affair. With the help of Yves Bouvier, Dmitry Rybolovlev accumulated one of the most spectacular art collections of modern times since 2003.[18] Rybolovlev's art collection includes paintings by Paul Gauguin, Auguste Rodin, Amedeo Modigliani (Nude on a Blue Cushion), Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse, and Mark Rothko (No. 6).[19]



On 25 February 2015, Bouvier was indicted in Monaco on charges of fraud and complicity in money laundering.[20] The charges followed a criminal complaint made by Rybolovlev’s family trust alleging that Bouvier had systematically overcharged it over a period of 10 years to acquire paintings.[21][22][23] Specifically, the Russian billionaire’s lawyers accused Bouvier of having misrepresented his role in obtaining 38 art pieces for $2 billion and having thus defrauded Rybolovlev to the tune of a little more than $1 billion,[11] using offshore companies to disguise his gains.[24]

Subsequent developments[edit]

After HSBC Monaco provided a letter during the police investigation that erroneously stated that Bouvier and a co-defendant, Tania Rappo, with whom he is accused to have conspired to launder money from his art deal proceeds, held joint accounts at the bank, Bouvier called for an investigation into that matter.[25] HSBC stated the error was "unintentional and clerical."[25]

Allegations occurred in the French and Swiss press that Rybolovlev received help in arresting Bouvier from Monaco’s justice minister, Philippe Narmino, and Jean-Pierre Dreno, the state prosecutor.[26][27] On that basis, Bouvier and Rappo attempted to have the charges against them thrown out in November 2015, arguing that there were a number of irregularities in the legal procedure against them and that Rybolovlev may have exercised undue influence.[28] However, the judge rejected their argument.[28] Criminal proceedings are ongoing as of 2018.[29]


On 12 March 2015, Rybolovlev sued Bouvier in Singapore, asking for a global freeze on Bouvier’s and Rappo’s assets.[11] On 13 March, Senior Judge Lai Siu Chiu of the High Court of Singapore ordered the global freezing of Bouvier’s assets.[30] The Singapore Court of Appeal repealed the decision and ordered that Bouvier’s assets be unfrozen, citing a low risk that Bouvier would dissipate his assets and that Rybolovlev failed to follow procedure in the injunction by not giving Bouvier notice of the proceedings.[31]

In March 2016, the High Court of Singapore dismissed Bouvier's attempt to suspend the civil suit filed in the territory against him by two companies linked to the Rybolovlev family trust. Bouvier had argued the dispute should be fought in the Swiss courts.[32] In a judgment published on 22 March 2016, Senior Judge Lai Siu Chiu ruled that the Singapore suit, which was filed in the High Court in 2015, should proceed. She said the case should be transferred to the Singapore International Commercial Court, which deals specifically with cross-border commercial disputes.[32]

On 18 April 2017, the Court of Appeal of Singapore again contradicted the High Court, ruling that Switzerland was a more appropriate forum for the civil lawsuit.[33][34]

Hong Kong[edit]

Next to Singapore, Bouvier also had the assets of his Hong Kong-based company Mei Invest Limited frozen through an injunction in July 2015.[35] In September that year, it was announced that a consent summons had been agreed upon between Bouvier and Accent Delight International Limited as well as Xitrans Finance Limited, two of Rybolovlev’s companies. Subsequently, Bouvier’s assets were unfrozen.[36]

United States[edit]

In New York, auction house Sotheby’s got embroiled in the legal dispute in 2016 when the art dealers that had originally sold Da Vinci’s Salvator Mundi painting to Bouvier, learned that he had sold it to Rybolovlev at a much higher price. According to court papers, Sotheby’s was asked to clarify whether it had been aware that the painting was worth more than what the art dealers had sold it to Bouvier for, and whether the auction house had misled the dealers in favor of the Swiss trader.[37]

In November that year, Sotheby's issued a pre-emptive suit in relation to the Salvator Mundi painting, denying that it had ever been part of a scheme allegedly perpetrated by Bouvier to defraud both the sellers of the painting, and Rybolovlev.[38]

On 11 June 2018, the US District Court in New York granted Rybolovlev permission to access Sotheby’s paperwork regarding its interactions with Bouvier for his ongoing lawsuits against the Swiss in Monaco and Switzerland.[39]

Another ongoing US investigation into Bouvier and his alleged involvement in fraudulent activities was dropped in May 2018.[40]

On 2 October 2018, Rybolovlev sued Sotheby's for $380 million, alleging the auction house had "materially assisted the largest art fraud in history" and that Sotheby's "knowingly and intentionally made the fraud possible" because it was aware of how much Bouvier had paid the original sellers of the paintings later purchased by Rybolovlev.[41] Sotheby's called these allegations "baseless" and told Reuters it would seek to have the lawsuit dismissed in a New York court.[42]

Impact of the Bouvier Affair[edit]

The Bouvier Affair has been widely reported and followed across the art world and beyond as one of the biggest scandals in the sector to date as it laid bare "the exploitation of art for financial gain"[43] and put a spotlight on the often ethically blurry business behaviors of middlemen in the notoriously opaque art market.[44][45]

Commentators have opined that the unfolding events could be the catalyst for a renewed push to reform the art sector,[46] for example, through the introduction of guarantees for vendors of highly-valued works of art. Furthermore, the private art sales market is expected to take a hit following the public exposure of the scandal.[47]


  1. ^ Mulholland, Rory (2015-02-26). "Monaco FC owner Rybolovlev among alleged victims of huge art scam". ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 2018-08-29.
  2. ^
  3. ^ "Bouvier Shenanigans, Chapter Two: Steve Cohen". Real Clear Arts. Retrieved 8 January 2016. A suit filed by the Shefner family in New York in 2013 named Bouvier as a co-defendant alongside Paris-based Galerie Jacques de la Béraudière. Bouvier strenuously denies the claims against him, arguing that it is purely circumstantial and not based on any solid evidence. His lawyers have argued that there is no case to answer. The case remains pending.
  4. ^ "Shefner v Jacques de la Beraudiere" (PDF). Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  5. ^ "Shefner v Jacques de la Beraudiere" (PDF). Justicia. Retrieved 30 August 2018.
  6. ^ Röbel, Sven; Sontheimer, Michael (13 June 2011). "The $7 Million Fake: Forgery Scandal Embarrasses International Art World". Der Spiegel. Spiegel Online. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  7. ^ "Steueroase: Freihäfen seien keine Schmuggler-Höhlen, beteuert Bouvier". ZEIT ONLINE (in German). Retrieved 2018-08-30.
  8. ^ "Steueroase: Freihäfen seien keine Schmuggler-Höhlen, beteuert Bouvier". ZEIT ONLINE. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  9. ^ Bellet, Harry. "L'homme d'affaires Yves Bouvier mis en examen pour recel de deux Picasso volés". Le Monde (in French). Le ISSN 1950-6244. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  10. ^ Carvajal, Doreen; Bowley, Graham (23 September 2015). "The Billionaire, the Picassos and a $30 Million Gift to Shame a Middleman". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  11. ^ a b c "The Art-World Insider Who Went Too Far". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2018-08-30.
  12. ^ AFP. "so Russian billionaire in art dealer feud hands over Picassos". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 February 2016.
  13. ^ Samuel, Henry. "Yves Bouvier charged over 'concealed theft' of Picasso paintings". The Telegraph. Retrieved 3 February 2016.
  14. ^ a b Match, Paris. "Affaire Rybolovlev : une héritière de Picasso liée au scandale. Révélations exclusives" (in French). Retrieved 2018-08-30.
  15. ^ a b "Vaduz classe une plainte pour blanchiment visant Yves Bouvier". Retrieved 2018-08-30.
  16. ^ "New Evidence in Stolen Picassos Case - artnet News". artnet News. 2016-07-12. Retrieved 2018-08-30.
  17. ^ "Swiss Authorities Investigate 'Freeport King' Yves Bouvier for More Than $100 Million in Back Taxes". artnet News. 2017-09-06. Retrieved 2018-09-03.
  18. ^ Miller, Hugo (31 May 2016). "Art's $1 Billion Question: Was Russian a Victim or Savant?". Bloomberg.
  19. ^ Gattegno, Hervé. "Oligarque contre marchand d'art : révélations sur l'affaire qui faut trembler Monaco et la Suisse". Vanity Fair (in French). Retrieved 2018-08-30.
  20. ^ Ui-Hoon, Cheah. "Freeport king fails in appeal against Monaco criminal charges". The Business Times. Retrieved 2018-08-30.
  21. ^ Knight, Sam. "A Reporter At Lage: The Bouvier Affair". The New Yorker. Retrieved 3 February 2016.
  22. ^ hugodmiller, Stephanie Baker StephaniBaker Hugo Miller. "The Billionaire, the Dealer, and the $186 Million Rothko". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  23. ^ "Steve Cohen's Modigliani In The Middle Of An Art Market War: Billionaire Rybolovlev vs Yves Bouvier". Forbes. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  24. ^ Fontevecchia, Agustino. "Steve Cohen's Modigliani In The Middle Of An Art Market War: Billionaire Rybolovlev vs Yves Bouvier". Forbes. Retrieved 2018-08-30.
  25. ^ a b Letzing, John; Colchester, Max (2015-11-20). "Russian Billionaire's Battle With Art Dealer Draws In HSBC". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2018-08-31.
  26. ^ Villarreal, Ignacio. "Monaco gives go-ahead to million-dollar art fraud trial between Dmitry Rybolovlev and Yves Bouvier". Retrieved 2018-08-31.
  27. ^ "Vaduz classe une plainte pour blanchiment visant Yves Bouvier". Retrieved 2018-08-31.
  28. ^ a b "Freeport king fails in appeal against Monaco criminal charges". The Business Times. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  29. ^ "Art Dealer Quizzed After Billionaire's Fraud Complaint". Bloomberg. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
  30. ^ "Singapore court orders asset freeze on 'Freeport King'". Reuters. 13 March 2017. Retrieved 3 November 2016.
  31. ^ "Singapore Court Unfreezes Bouvier's Assets - artnet News". artnet News. 2015-08-25. Retrieved 2018-08-31.
  32. ^ a b hermes. "Singapore court to hear $1.4b art suit". The Straits Times. Retrieved 26 March 2016.
  33. ^ "Yves Bouvier clears legal hurdle in Singapore". The Art Newspaper. 19 April 2017. Retrieved 25 November 2017.
  34. ^ "Terms of Service Violation". Retrieved 2018-08-31.
  35. ^ "Swiss Newspaper Gets Bouvier's Revealing Emails - artnet News". artnet News. 2015-04-08. Retrieved 2018-08-31.
  36. ^ "Swiss art dealer's Hong Kong assets unfrozen amid court battle with Russian tycoon who accused him of swindling". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 2018-08-31.
  37. ^ "Sotheby's Tries to Block Suit Over a Leonardo Sold and Resold at a Big Markup". Retrieved 2018-08-31.
  38. ^
  39. ^ "Russian Billionaire Rybolovlev Wins Access to a Trove of Confidential Documents in His Ongoing Crusade Against Yves Bouvier | artnet News". artnet News. 2018-06-21. Retrieved 2018-08-31.
  40. ^ Berthelsen, Christian. "Russian's Da Vinci Windfall Undercut U.S. Probe of Art Dealer". Bloomberg. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
  41. ^ Kazakina, Katya (3 October 2018). "Billionaire Slaps Sotheby's With $380 Million Lawsuit". Bloomberg.
  42. ^ Devitt, Polina. "Russian tycoon sues Sotheby's for $380 million over art deals". U.S. Retrieved 2018-10-04.
  43. ^ "How Modern Art Serves the Rich". The New Republic. Retrieved 2018-08-29.
  44. ^ "Terms of Service Violation". Retrieved 2018-08-29.
  45. ^ Frank, Robert (2015-03-13). "Art scandal may expose mass fraud in art market". CNBC. Retrieved 2018-08-29.
  46. ^ "Does the art market need more regulation? - Apollo Magazine". Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  47. ^ "What will 2018 hold for the art market?". Retrieved 2018-08-29.