The Consolations of Philosophy
The Consolations of Philosophy (ISBN 0-140-27661-0) is a nonfiction book by Alain de Botton. First published by Hamish Hamilton in 2000, subsequent publications (2001 onwards) have been by Penguin Books.
The title of the book is a reference to Boethius's magnum opus Consolation of Philosophy, in which philosophy appears as an allegorical figure to Boethius to console him in the year he was imprisoned, leading up to his impending execution.
In Consolations, de Botton attempts to console the reader through everyday problems (or at least help them to understand them) by extensively quoting and interpreting a number of philosophers. These are categorised in a number of chapters with one philosopher used in each.
- Consolation for Unpopularity (Socrates)
- Consolation for Not Having Enough Money (Epicurus)
- Consolation for Frustration (Seneca)
- Consolation for Inadequacy (Montaigne)
- Consolation for a Broken Heart (Schopenhauer)
- Consolation for Difficulties (Nietzsche)
The critical reception for Consolations has been primarily positive. It received glowing praise in, among other publications, The New York Review of Books, The Times, The Spectator, The Sunday Telegraph, The Sunday Times, The Irish Times, The Literary Review, and The Mail on Sunday.
Humphrey Carpenter in The Sunday Times, (2 April 2000) said, "The Consolations of Philosophy is certainly a commentary rather than a work of original thought; but few discussions on the great philosophers can have been so entertaining. De Botton takes us on a brisk, playful tour of the lives and ideas of half-a-dozen of the big names in the history of philosophy."
According to Ben Rogers in the Sunday Telegraph, "singling these thinkers out and grouping them together is only the smaller part of de Botton’s achievement. He has also succeeded in bringing each one to life. The lessons that he draws from his sages might, in other hands, have appeared trite. But he writes with such charm and freshness that he somehow avoids the pitfall."
A few critics have been negative. Edward Skidelsky of the New Statesman wrote: "Comforting, but meaningless. In seeking to popularise philosophy, Alain de Botton has merely trivialised it, smoothing the discipline into a series of silly sound bites. ... [De Botton's The Consolations of Philosophy] is bad because the conception of philosophy that it promotes is a decadent one, and can only mislead readers as to the true nature of the discipline."
Jonathan Lear, writing in the New York Times said: "Academic philosophy in the United States has virtually abandoned the attempt to speak to the culture at large, but philosophy professors are doing something of incredible importance: they are trying to get things right. That is the thread that connects them back to Socrates -- even if they are not willing to follow him into the marketplace -- and that is the thread that The Consolations of Philosophy cuts. ...[L]et's face it, this isn't philosophy."
- Socrates on Self-Confidence
- Epicurus on Happiness
- Seneca on Anger
- Montaigne on Self-Esteem
- Schopenhauer on Love
- Nietzsche on Hardship
- Seneca the Younger
- Michel de Montaigne
- Arthur Schopenhauer
- Friedrich Nietzsche
- The Consolations of Philosophy - Reviews. Retrieved from http://www.alaindebotton.com/pages/content/index.asp?PageID=116.
- "Sunday Telegraph". Alain de Botton. 2000-04-02. Retrieved 2019-05-30.
- "THE CONSOLATIONS OF PHILOSOPHY by Alain de Botton". Kirkus Reviews. 2016-11-11. Retrieved 2019-05-30.
- Lurie, Alison (2007-03-15). "When Is a Building Beautiful?". The New York Review of Books. Retrieved 2019-05-30.
- Skidelsky, Edward (2000-03-27). "Comforting, but meaningless." New Statesman, 27 March 2000. Retrieved from http://www.newstatesman.com/200003270050.
- Lear, Jonathan (2000-05-14). "The Socratic Method". New York Times, 14 May 2000. Retrieved from https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C05E3D71F39F937A25756C0A9669C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=2.