The Horrible Dr. Hichcock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Horrible Dr. Hichcock
The Horrible Dr. Hichcock (poster).jpg
Directed by Riccardo Freda
Produced by
Screenplay by Ernesto Gastaldi
Story by Ernesto Gastaldi
Starring
Music by Roman Vlad[2]
Cinematography Raffaele Masiocchi[2]
Edited by Ornella Micheli[2]
Production
company
Panda Cinematografica[3]
Distributed by Warner Bros. (Italy)
Release date
  • June 30, 1962 (1962-06-30) (Italy)
Running time
84 minutes[1]
Country Italy[1]
Budget ₤96 million
Box office ₤142 million

The Horrible Dr. Hichcock (Italian title: L'Orribile segreto del Dr. Hichcock) is a 1962 Italian horror film directed by Riccardo Freda and written by Ernesto Gastaldi. The film stars Barbara Steele and Robert Flemyng.

Plot[edit]

The story is set in 1885 and concerns a Dr. Hichcock, a necrophiliac whose horrible secret of the title involves drugging his wife for sexual funeral games. One day he accidentally administers an overdose and kills her. Several years later he remarries, with the intention of using the blood of his new bride (Steele) to bring his first wife's rotting corpse back to life.

Production[edit]

Unlike director Riccardo Freda's previous gothic styled film I vampiri, The Horrible Dr. Hichcock was made in a climate where there were more gothic horror films being produced in Italy.[4] The film began when Luigi Carpentieri phoned screenwriter Ernesto Gastaldi to write a giallo story that he liked titled Spectral.[4][5] Gastaldi wrote his own treatment under the title Raptus.[5] The original script did no contain the necrophilia that is in the film, which Gastaldi commented that he did not remember why he added it, suggesting that "perhaps one of the associates asked for something harder, more macabre"[5] Freda later claimed that the story was his idea, proclaiming that "It is entirely my idea. I nurtured it for a long time but it is Ernesto Gastaldi, av ery good scenarist, who shaped it into form."[5] Gastaldi commented on this saying that when he met Freda they did not discuss the film with him and that producer Ermanno Donati gave Freda the script saying "Let's see if you have the balls to shoot this stuff, it's about cropses!"[5] Gastaldi stated that Freda did not even read the script, and replied "As long as I get paid, I'm shooting even the phone book."[5]

Among the cast was Barbara Steele who took 10 days off the set of Federico Fellini's to perform her role in the film.[6] Robert Flemyng who was predominantly working in television at the time time and took the script as he wanted to go to Rome.[6] After reading the script titled Raptus and only later found the film involved necrophilia and attempted to get out of the film.[6] His agent stated it was too late as he had signed the contract and went forward with making the film.[6] Harriet White had been working with Italy since the end of World War II. She received a call from Flemyng before shooting suggesting that they act so badly that the film would not be released.[6][7] The Italian cast and crew hid their names under British sounding names, this included Freda being credited as Robert Hampton while set designer Franco Fumagalli became Frank Smokecocks, a literal translation of his last name.[6] Each cast member spoke his or her own language when filming.[7]

The film was shot at Villa Perucchetti in Via Pietro Paolo Rubens 21 in Rome.[7] There are different recollections to how long the film took to make, the schedule was from April 9 to May 5, 1962 with a 96 million lire budget.[8] Freda stated the film was finished in two weeks, while film historians Alan Upchurch and Tim Lucas state it was shot in 14 days.[8] Marcello Avallone who worked on the film and Gastaldi stated it took three weeks.[8] Steele recalled that production had long 18 hour days "thanks to the massive doses of Sambuca and coffee. If a dolly collapsed, Freda would just pull the camera on a carpet. Nothing would stop that man."[7] To film everything, Freda sped up proceedings by having three small crews work on the film at once. One of the crews was entrusted to Avallone who Freda had bonded over through their mutual love of horse racing.[7] Avallone stated that he shot things like close-ups and cutaways to save time.[7] Avallone mentioned that two versions of some sequences were shot: the original Italian wihc was more suggestive and chaste, and another for foreign markets that was more risque as Freda did not want to shoot the more explicit scenes.[7][8] As of 2017, these versions have not been found.[8] The assistant cameraman Giuseppe Maccari played down the second units, stating that multiple camera were used only on some scenes, such as the climax with the fire in Hichock's villa.[8] The films make-up artist Euclide Santoli recalled the grotesque scenes where Hichcock's face swells and deforms right before the camera.[6] Do the effect, Santoli used a double mask with the first being thick and identical to the actor's face, it would be applied first then a second mask that was thin was stuck to the other along the edges with tubes used to blow air through them.[6] Freda later stated the producers ruined the scenes with this special effect.[6] Freda stated the producers had them split the nightmare scene into several pieces instead of having it be one long take.[6]

Release[edit]

The Horrible Dr. Hichcock was submitted to the board of censors in June 1962 where it was given the V.M.18 rating, becoming the first horror film to receive this rating after the new rating system was brought in April 1962.[9] Despite the directors and other sources claims, there were the board of censors did not demand that there be any cuts to the film.[9] It was released in Italy on June 30, 1962 and was distributed by Warner Bros.[1] The film grossed a total of 142 million Italian lira on its theatrical run.[1] Box office returns in Italy were considered strong enough that when the Ricardo Blasco's Spanish film Autopsy of a Criminal (1963) was released in Italy, it was promoted as a follow-up titled L'assassino del dott. Hitchkok.[1][10]

The film was initially retitled as Raptus: The Secret of Dr. Hichcock and offered to American International Pictures by Donati and Carpentieri.[10] The company turned it down as they could not have it toned down for general audiences in the United States.[10] It was released in October 1964 in the United States where it was distributed by Sigma III Corporation.[10] The American version is cut to 76 minutes which re-arranged scenes and added dissolves and was not always faithful to Gastaldi's original script.[10] British audiences saw it the next year where it was titled The Terror of Dr. Hichcock.[10] In 2015, a novelization of the film was published in the United States by Raven Head Press by Michael R. Hudson who had previously adapted several of Gastaldi's scripts to novel, including My Name is Nobody and The Case of the Bloody Iris.[10]

Reception[edit]

From a contemporary review, the New York Times reviewed both The Horrible Dr. Hichcock and The Awful Dr. Orloff stated "For once, the adjectives in the titles were not only descriptive but also accurate."[11] In France, Positif described the film as "seem a hymn to necrophilia [...] the storms, the excesses, the veneer of a modern chirurgical décor to cover a stylised rococo background, even the photography dominated by fascinating and artifical flashes of color"[10] The Monthly Film Bulletin declared the film "consistently gripping and enjoyable" despite numerous it borrowing from a numerous sources including Vampyr, Jane Eyre, Rebecca, and Jekyll and Hyde, the "guiding hands of director Riccardo Freda and cameraman Raffaelle Masciocchi are unmistakable" noting the use of colour, light, editing and "visually striking compositions."[12]

Glenn Erickson has written his essay "The Horrible Dr. Hichcock: Women on the Verge of a Gothic Breakdown," about how "The outrageous central concern of The Horrible Dr. Hichcock has never been considered appropriate for any film openly advertised and exhibited to the public, horror or otherwise. That a film about the frustrated passions of a necrophiliac could even be released in 1962 is a censorial mystery in its own right -- or, perhaps, a clear testament to the way horror films were officially ignored on every cultural level back then."[13] Meanwhile, the film has been praised as "a unique Italian gothic" with authentic sets, particular artful acting by Flemyng and a Barbara Steele at her best.[14]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f Curti 2015, p. 69.
  2. ^ a b c Curti 2015, p. 68.
  3. ^ Curti 2017, p. 318.
  4. ^ a b Curti 2017, p. 177.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Curti 2017, p. 178.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Curti 2017, p. 184.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Curti 2017, p. 185.
  8. ^ a b c d e f Curti 2017, p. 186.
  9. ^ a b Curti 2017, p. 188.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h Curti 2017, p. 189.
  11. ^ Archer, Eugene (December 3, 1964). "L Orribile Segreto del Dottor Hitchcock (1962) A Pair of Films". The New York Times. Retrieved June 16, 2016. 
  12. ^ "Orrible segreto del dottor hichcock, L' (The Terrible Dr. Hichcock)". Monthly Film Bulletin. Vol. 30 no. 348. British Film Institute. 1963. p. 160. ISSN 0027-0407. 
  13. ^ Erickson, Glenn. The Horrible Dr. Hichcock: Women on the Verge of a Gothic Breakdown, dvdtalk.com
  14. ^ Hughes, p.81

Sources[edit]

  • Hughes, Howard (2011). Cinema Italiano - The Complete Guide From Classics To Cult. London - New York: I.B.Tauris. ISBN 978-1-84885-608-0. 
  • Curti, Roberto (2015). Italian Gothic Horror Films, 1957-1969. McFarland. ISBN 1476619891. 
  • Curti, Roberto (2017). Riccardo Freda: The Life and Works of a Born Filmmaker. McFarland. ISBN 1476628386. 

External links[edit]