The Man They Could Not Hang (1934 film)
|The Man They Could Not Hang|
Theatrical release poster
|Directed by||Raymond Longford|
|Produced by||Rigby C. Tearle (J.A. Lipman)|
|Based on||dramatisation by Rigby C. Tearle of the autobiography of John Lee|
|Distributed by||British Empire Films|
|1 June 1934|
|Box office||£2,200 (Australia)|
In Devonshire, John Lee works for wealthy spinster Emma Keys. On the night he is engaged to be married, Keys is murdered and Lee is arrested on circumstantial evidence and is convicted of murder. He is condemned to death but when the authorities try to execute him the trap doors will not open. They fail a second time and his sentence is commuted to life imprisonment. There is a sub-plot about smuggling and secret service agents.
- Ronald Roberts as John Babbacombe Lee
- Arthur W. Sterry as John Lee Snr
- Ethel Bashford as Mrs Lee
- Olive Sinclair as Miss Keyse
- Patricia Minchin as Eliza Parrish
- Ethel Gabriel as Jane Allen
- Claire Barnes as Kate Farmer
- Sam Stern as Bertrand
- Les Warton as Ted Meeks
- George Doran as Captain Giles
- Leo Starke as Captain Hill
- Nugent Harrington as Tim Sanders
- Bobbie Beaumont as Polly Sanders
- W. Newton Carroll as Ned Sawkins
The production company responsible for the film, Invicta, was formed by J.A. Lipman, in 1933 with capital of ₤5,000. Lipman hired Raymond Longford and produced the film under the name of 'Rigby C. Tearle'. The story had been filmed twice before to great box office success. Eric Bedford wrote the scenario.
The cast included Arthur W. Sterry, who exhibited the 1912 version of the story and directed the 1921 one.
This section may need to be rewritten entirely to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. (October 2017)
A few days prior to the film's premiere, the New South Wales police requested a number of cuts be made to the film regarding its depiction of the police. This was done, even though the film was set in England.
The film was given a poor critical reception, the Sydney Morning Herald calling it:
Purely antiquarian. The very language of the characters is far-off and unreal... could have been directed in a more convincing way.. The one bright spot in the whole melancholy chronicle is the acting of Mr. Ron Roberts... Given better material, this young man could do some excellent work.
The critic from The Argus said that the film was:
Closer to the far-fetched melodrama of The Streets of London than to the realism of the better films of to-day. The story... doubtless contains good dramatic material, but Invicta Films, an Australian company, have so disguised it that it appears sillier than the creations of the hack scenario writer's fancy. The complicated story has been unwound in a rambling, disjointed fashion, and the dialogue is so childishly stiff and melodramatic that even the most docile audience is fidgeting and giggling before the end. The cast is full of those stage types that went out with the appearance of Pinero – the red-eyed village maiden, who murmurs "Justice will prevail", the moustached French villain, who cannot speak without leering, smirking and kissing his finger- tips, and the stalwart British policeman, who arrests the wrong man with the noble words, "Duty is duty." The spirit of the piece seems to have possessed the cast completely, but perhaps the stiffness of the acting is due to their ignorance of the difference between stage and screen technique.
The Courier Mail did say "the prison scenes are realistically done, and at times the tension is strong."
The film obtained a small release in England where it also received bad reviews.
The movie performed solidly in country areas. However, by the end of 1934 a trade paper reported it as having earned only £2,200 at the Australian box office with the possibility of this going up to £3,000 ("although it's doubtful") and the sale to England giving it a chance to recoup the budget. It is unclear whether this happened.
Longford never made another feature as director.
- "Advertising". The Sydney Morning Herald. National Library of Australia. 1 June 1934. p. 3. Retrieved 10 August 2012.
- "Counting the Cash in Australian Films"', Everyones 12 December 1934 p 19
- "TERRIBLE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE". The Times and Northern Advertiser. Peterborough, South Australia: National Library of Australia. 16 November 1934. p. 3. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
- "NEW REGISTRATIONS". The Sydney Morning Herald. National Library of Australia. 14 November 1933. p. 11. Retrieved 10 August 2012.
- "THE MAN THEY COULD NOT HANG". Sunday Mail. Brisbane: National Library of Australia. 4 February 1934. p. 12. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- "AUSTRALIAN FILMS". The Sydney Morning Herald. National Library of Australia. 3 March 1934. p. 10. Retrieved 10 August 2012.
- Andrew Pike and Ross Cooper, Australian Film 1900–1977: A Guide to Feature Film Production, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1998, 166
- "PERSONAL". The Sydney Morning Herald. National Library of Australia. 31 May 1934. p. 9 Supplement: Women's Supplement. Retrieved 8 December 2012.
- "FILM REVIEWS". The Sydney Morning Herald. National Library of Australia. 4 June 1934. p. 3. Retrieved 26 August 2013.
- "The Lyceum A POOR PRODUCTION". The Argus. Melbourne: National Library of Australia. 9 July 1934. p. 5. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
- "THE REGENT THEATRE". The Courier-Mail. Brisbane: National Library of Australia. 7 June 1934. p. 21. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- "SCREEN NOTES: By Preview". The Argus. Melbourne: National Library of Australia. 10 June 1936. p. 11. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
- "The Lyceum A POOR PRODUCTION." The Argus (Melbourne) 9 Jul 1934:5 accessed 7 December 2011
- "Raymond Longford", Cinema Papers, January 1974 p51