The Mass Psychology of Fascism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Mass Psychology of Fascism
The Mass Psychology of Fascism (German edition).jpg
Cover of the German edition
AuthorWilhelm Reich
Original titleDie Massenpsychologie des Faschismus
SubjectFascism, authoritarianism, ideologically-oriented sexual repression[1][2]
PublisherFarrar, Straus and Giroux
Publication date
September 1933
Published in English
(translation based on the third, enlarged edition from August 1942)[3][4]
Media typePrint

The Mass Psychology of Fascism[5] (German: Die Massenpsychologie des Faschismus) is a 1933 psychology book written by the Austrian psychoanalyst and psychiatrist Wilhelm Reich, in which the author attempts to explain how fascists and authoritarians come into power through their political and ideologically-oriented sexual repression on the popular masses.[1][2]


Reich – originally from Galicia in the Austro-Hungarian Empire and practicing psychoanalysis and psychiatry in Vienna – joined the Social Democratic Party of Austria (SPÖ) in 1928. He joined the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) upon moving his psychoanalytic practice to Berlin in 1930. However, The Mass Psychology of Fascism was seen as being so critical of the communist regime in the Soviet Union that Reich was considered to be a liability to the KPD, and was subsequently kicked out of the party upon the book's publication in 1933.


The question at the heart of Reich's book was this: why did the masses turn to authoritarianism even though it is clearly against their interests?[6] In 1933, Reich set out to analyze "the economic and ideological structure of (particularly) German society between 1928 and 1933" in this book.[7] The healthy alternative, he proposes, is a form of "Workers Democracy", whereby those who 'do' the actual work make the decisions as to what, how and why.

Reich argued that the reason why German fascism (i.e., Nazism) was chosen over communism was that of increased sexual repression in Germany – as opposed to the somewhat more liberal (post-revolutionary) Russia. As children, members of the (German) proletariat learned from their parents to suppress nearly all sexual desire and – instead – expend the repressed energy into authoritarian idealism.[2] Hence, in adults, any rebellious and sexual impulses experienced would cause fundamental anxiety and – therefore, instead – social control is used to reduce anxiety. Fear of revolt, as well as fear of sexuality, were thus "anchored" in the 'character structure' of the masses (the majority). This influenced the irrationality of the 'people' and allowed (irrational) 'populistic' ideology to flourish, Reich argued:[6]

Suppression of the natural sexuality in the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, good and adjusted in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. Initially, the child has to submit to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family, which process makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and anxiety.[6]

Reich noted that the symbolism of the swastika, evoking the fantasy of the primal scene, showed in spectacular fashion how Nazism systematically manipulated the collective unconscious. A repressive family, a baneful religion, a sadistic educational system, the terrorism of the party, fear of economic manipulation, fear of racial contamination, and permitted violence against minorities all operated in and through individuals' (the collective) unconscious psychology of emotions, traumatic experiences, fantasies, libidinal economies, and so on, and Nazi political ideology and practice exacerbated and exploited these tendencies.[7]

For Reich, fighting fascism meant first of all studying it scientifically, which was to say, using the methods of psychoanalysis. He believed that reason alone would be able to check the forces of irrationality and loosen the grip of mysticism and is also capable of playing its own part in developing original modes of political action, building on a deep respect for life, and promoting a harmonious channelling of libido and orgastic potency. Reich proposed "work democracy", a self-managing form of social organization that would preserve the individual's freedom, independence, autonomy and encourage his/her responsibility and society would thus base itself on these principles:

Love, work and knowledge are the well-springs of our life. They should also govern it.[7]


The book, along with many others banned by the Nazis when they came to power, was publicly burnt in the Nazi book burnings. Reich realized he was in considerable danger and hurriedly left Germany; first going to Austria (to see his ex-wife and children) and then to 'exile' in Denmark, Sweden & subsequently Norway. Reich was also subsequently expelled from the International Psychoanalytical Association in 1934 for his political militancy and his views on sexuality.[a] This book – and all of Reich's published books – were later ordered to be burned on the request of the Food and Drug Administration by a judge in Maine, United States in 1954.[10]

The authoritarian family as the first cell of the fascist society[edit]

Chapter V contains the famous statement that the family is the first cell of the fascist society:[11]

From the standpoint of social development, the family cannot be considered the basis of the authoritarian state, only as one of the most important institutions which support it. It is, however, its central reactionary germ cell, the most important place of reproduction of the reactionary and conservative individual. Being itself caused by the authoritarian system, the family becomes the most important institution for its conservation. In this connection, the findings of Morgan and of Engels are still entirely correct.

Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari reprised Reich arguments in their joint work Anti-Oedipus (1972), in which they discuss the formation of fascism at the molecular level of society.[12]

See also[edit]


Informational notes

  1. ^ According to his daughter Lore.[8] The British psychoanalyst Ernest Jones was probably the chief protagonist behind his expulsion and, even though Anna Freud allowed it, she later regretted this.[9]


  1. ^ a b Barratt, Barnaby B. (March 2021). O'Loughlin, Michael; Voela, Angie (eds.). "Psychoanalytic notes on the erotic politics of fascism and authoritarianism". Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 26 (1): 118–128. doi:10.1057/s41282-020-00181-6. eISSN 1543-3390. ISSN 1088-0763. S2CID 220049915.
  2. ^ a b c Pavón-Cuéllar, David (2017). "Marxism, psychoanalysis, and critique of psychology – Reich: subversive Freudo-Marxist proposals against adaptive psychological concessions of burgeois psychoanalysis". Marxism and Psychoanalysis: In or Against Psychology?. Concepts for Critical Psychology (1st ed.). New York and London: Routledge. pp. 125–129. ISBN 9781138916586. LCCN 2016032101.
  3. ^ John C. Conger; John P. Conger (2005). Jung and Reich: The Body as Shadow. North Atlantic Books. p. 110. ISBN 978-1-55643-544-7.
  4. ^ Borch, Christian (2012). The Politics of Crowds: An Alternative History of Sociology. Cambridge University Press. p. 194. ISBN 978-1-107-00973-8.
  5. ^[bare URL PDF]
  6. ^ a b c Sharaf, Myron (1994). Fury on Earth: A Biography of Wilhelm Reich. Da Capo Press. p. 163. ISBN 0-306-80575-8.
  7. ^ a b c The Mass Psychology of Fascism
  8. ^ Lore Reich Rubin; ‘Wilhelm Reich and Anna Freud: His Expulsion from Psychoanalysis’
  9. ^ see also The Century of the Self on YouTube)
  10. ^ Sharaf 1994, p. 458ff; "Decree of Injunction Order", 19 March 1954, USA v. Wilhelm Reich, 1954–1957.
  11. ^ The Sex-Economic Presuppositions of the Authoritarian Family, Chapter V
  12. ^ Anti-Oedipus, Continuum, 2004, pp. xiii, xviii

External links[edit]