The Quest for the Historical Muhammad (Ibn Warraq)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
QuestForTheHistoricalMuhammad.jpg
For other uses, see The Quest of the Historical Muhammad (disambiguation)

The Quest for the Historical Muhammad (2000), edited by Ibn Warraq, is an anthology of 15 studies examining the origins of Islam and the Qur'an. The contributors argue that traditional Islamic accounts of its history and the origins of the Qur'an are fictitious and based on historical revisionism aimed at forging a religious Arab identity.


Reception[edit]

In his review, Daniel Pipes praised the book as a "fascinating collection of essays" that raises "basic questions for Muslims concerning the prophet's role as a moral paragon".[1]

Criticism[edit]

Other well-known American scholars such as Fred Donner has criticized the selection of essays, and described it as a "monument to duplicity". Donner writes that Warraq unduly favors revisionist theories in order to advance "anti-Islam polemic," forwarding that "this lopsided character makes The Quest for the Historical Muhammad a book that is likely to mislead many an unwary general reader."[2]

Alfons Teipen, a professor of religion at Furman University, criticized the editing: "The two introductory articles... are one-sided, rather polemical overview[s] of... scholarship on the life of Muhammad."[3]

Asma Afsaruddin described the book as a "partisan work" and added that Warraq "clearly has an ideological axe to grind". Asma states that "poor editing, sloppy transliteration, and ad hominem attacks on certain authors...especially Watt, add to the chagrin of the reader", and argued that "Ibn Warraq is not interested in debate; he wants nothing less than wholesale conversion to his point of view within the community of scholars of Islam" and added that his book "needlessly poisons the atmosphere and stymies efforts to engage in honest scholarly discussion".[4]

In his review of the book, As'ad AbuKhalil states that Ibn Warraq collected old writings by Orientalists who have been long discredited and added that "the more rigid and biased the Orientalists, the better for Warraq".[5]

Ibn Warraq might have an «axe to grind»? His life and the lives of his family are at stake as are the lives of Laurent Lagartempe and of so many other authors who criticize islam publicly, unlike those scholars bribed to form a 5th column in the US Universities. William Montgomery Watt was convinced that the Qu'ran was the word of God! I would be careful about his other assertions. If the Qu'ran is the word of God I am sorry about his IQ. Or might He be plagued by Alzheimer since He seems to change His mind according to Muhammad's wishes for revenge or lust?

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ http://www.meforum.org/article/1360 Daniel Pipes: The Quest for the Historical Muhammad
  2. ^ Donner, Fred. (2001) Review: The Quest for the Historical Muhammad. Middle East Studies Association Bulletin, University of Chicago.
  3. ^ Teipen, Alfons H. (Summer 2003). "The Quest for the Historical Muhammad". Journal of Ecumenical Studies 40 (3): 328–9. 
  4. ^ Asfaruddin, Asma; Warraq, Ibn (2001). "The Quest for the Historical Muhammad". Journal of the American Oriental Society (American Oriental Society) 121 (4): 728–729. doi:10.2307/606555. JSTOR 606555. 
  5. ^ AbuKhalil, As'ad (2004). ""The Islam Industry" and Scholarship: Review Article". Middle East Journal (Middle East Institute) 58 (1): 130–137. JSTOR 4329978. 

Further reading[edit]