The Responsibility of Intellectuals
The article was written during the then-ongoing Vietnam War, as news of human rights abuses started to return to the United States, and as the war had increasingly become seen as a quagmire. An attack on the intellectual culture in the U.S., Chomsky argues that it is largely subservient to power. He is particularly critical of social scientists and technocrats, who he believed were providing a pseudo-scientific justification for the crimes of the state in regard to the Vietnam War. He notes that those who opposed the war on moral rather than technical grounds are "often psychologists, mathematicians, chemists, or philosophers, ... rather than people with Washington contacts, who, of course, realize that 'had they a new, good idea about Vietnam, they would get a prompt and respectful hearing' in Washington."
The topic was inspired by articles of Dwight Macdonald published after the Second World War who "asks the question: To what extent were the German or Japanese people responsible for the atrocities committed by their governments? And, quite properly, ... turns the question back to us: To what extent are the British or American people responsible for the vicious terror bombings of civilians, perfected as a technique of warfare by the Western democracies and reaching their culmination in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, surely among the most unspeakable crimes in history."
Let me finally return to Dwight Macdonald and the responsibility of intellectuals. Macdonald quotes an interview with a death-camp paymaster who burst into tears when told that the Russians would hang him. "Why should they? What have I done?" he asked. Macdonald concludes: "Only those who are willing to resist authority themselves when it conflicts too intolerably with their personal moral code, only they have the right to condemn the death-camp paymaster." The question, "What have I done?" is one that we may well ask ourselves, as we read each day of fresh atrocities in Vietnam—as we create, or mouth, or tolerate the deceptions that will be used to justify the next defense of freedom.— Chomsky, "The Responsibility of Intellectuals" 1967
In February 2017, on the 50th anniversary of the publication of ‘The Responsibility of Intellectuals’, a conference was held at University College London. In 2019, a book based on this conference was published entitled, The Responsibility of Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and others after 50 years and edited by three Chomsky biographers, Nicholas Allott, Chris Knight (anthropologist) and Neil Smith (linguist). [University College London] attempted to impose restrictions on what could be said at the book launch. Chomsky described this as an ‘utter outrage’ and the restrictions were eventually dropped.
- Intellectual responsibility – the more general concept found in philosophy
- Chomsky, Noam (1967-02-23). "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". The New York Review of Books. 8 (3). Retrieved 2009-09-03.
- Chomsky, Noam (February 23, 1967). "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". The New York Review of Books. Retrieved 13 December 2009.
- Jacoby, Russell (1989). "The Responsibility of Intellectuals?". Grand Street. 8 (4): 185–195. doi:10.2307/25007282. ISSN 0734-5496. JSTOR 25007282.
- Noam Chomsky's 'The Responsibility of Intellectuals', 50 Years On - Video of Conference at University College London.
- The Responsibility of Intellectuals – Reflections by Noam Chomsky and others after 50 years, 'Open Access Book', UCL Press, 2019.
- Mike Cushman, ‘UCL attack on Academic Freedom’, Free Speech on Israel; Matthew Reisz, Times Higher Education Supplement, 24 October 2019.
- "The Responsibility of Intellectuals" at The New York Review of Books
- Letter in response by George Steiner; reply by Noam Chomsky. March 23, 1967.
- Letters in response by Fryar Calhoun, E. B. Murray, and Arthur Dorfman; reply by Noam Chomsky. April 20, 1967.
- Letter in response by Raziel Abelson. April 20, 1967.
|This article about an essay or essay collection is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|