The Swerve

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Swerve: How the World Became Modern
The Swerve - How the World Became Modern.jpg
AuthorStephen Greenblatt
CountryUnited States, UK
LanguageEnglish
GenreNon-fiction
PublisherW. W. Norton & Company (hardcover)
Publication date
September 2011 (hardcover) ISBN 9780393064476
ASIN: B005LW5J9O (kindle US)
(mobipocket UK)ISBN 9781446499290
(epub) ISBN 9780393083385
September 2012 (paperback) ISBN 9780099572442
June 2015 (audiobook) ISBN 9781501260506
Pages368 (hardcover)

The Swerve: How the World Became Modern (paperback edition: The Swerve: How the Renaissance Began[1]) is a book by Stephen Greenblatt and winner of the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction and 2011 National Book Award for Nonfiction.[2][3]

Greenblatt tells the story of how Poggio Bracciolini, a 15th-century papal emissary and obsessive book hunter, saved the last copy of the Roman poet Lucretius's De rerum natura (On the Nature of Things) from near-terminal neglect in a German monastery, thus reintroducing important ideas that sparked the modern age.[4][5][6]

The title and the subtitle of the book are explained in the author's preface. "The Swerve" refers to a key conception in the ancient atomistic theories according to which atoms moving through the void are subject to clinamen: while falling straight through the void, they are sometimes subject to a slight, unpredictable swerve. Greenblatt uses it to describe the history of Lucretius' own book: "The reappearance of his poem was such a swerve, an unforeseen deviation from the direct trajectory—in this case, toward oblivion—on which that poem and its philosophy seemed to be traveling."[7] The recovery of the ancient text is seen as its rebirth, i.e. a "renaissance". Greenblatt's claim is that it was a 'key moment' in a larger "story ... of how the world swerved in a new direction".[7]

Reception[edit]

The book attracted considerable critical attention, some positive and some negative. In addition to winning both the Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award, it also won the Modern Language Association James Russell Lowell Prize.[8] Publishers Weekly called it a "gloriously learned page-turner", and Newsweek called it "mesmerizing" and "richly entertaining".[citation needed] Maureen Corrigan, in her review for NPR, praised the work as brilliant and brimming with ideas and stories.[9] It was included in the 2011 year-end lists of Publishers Weekly,[10] The New York Times,[10] Kirkus Reviews,[11] NPR,[12] The Chicago Tribune,[13] Bloomberg,[14] SFGate,[15] the American Library Association,[16] and The Globe and Mail.[17]

Writing in The New Republic, David Quint saw the book as situated in a controversial tradition that views the Renaissance as a victory of reason over medieval religiosity, following John Addington Symonds, Voltaire and David Hume.[18] Theologian R. R. Reno harshly criticized the book for "blustering again and again about the beauty-loathing, eros-denying evils of Christianity ... sighing in the usual postmodern way about pleasure and desire."[19]

Historian John Monfasani credited the book with "grace and learning" but found Greenblatt's Voltairean and Burckhardtian interpretation of De Rerum Natura and the Renaissance "eccentric", "questionable" and "unwarranted".[20] Greenblatt responded to this critique by reiterating his view of the importance of the Renaissance in history.[21] Several other reviewers criticized Greenblatt's lack of historical rigor and depth while acknowledging some praiseworthy elements. In the Los Angeles Review of Books Jim Hinch saw within the book "two books... one deserving of an award, the other not". He described the first "book" as an "engaging" and "wonderful" exploration of the Renaissance rediscovery of De Rerum Natura, while describing the second book as a far less deserving "anti-religious polemic."[22]

Michael Dirda, of The Washington Post, wrote that "by no means a bad book, The Swerve simply sets its intellectual bar too low, complacently relying on commonplaces in its historical sections and never engaging in an imaginative or idiosyncratic way". Disappointed with the book's simplistic and clichéd conclusions, he nonetheless saw Greenblatt's "excellent notes and bibliography" as a reliable reference for those seeking a more in-depth and serious treatment.[23] Laura Saetveit Miles, of the University of Bergen, criticized the book in explicitly ethical terms, writing that its scholarly and historiographical failings "represent an abuse of power" that "precipitate the decline of the humanities" by lending scholarly authority to the "dire trend of 'truthy' nonfiction books that present One Theory to Explain Everything." She argues that the book is an "injustice to the past" and "the mythical invention of modernity is an ethical issue, because it sets a precedent for history that ignores complexity in favor of oversimplification."[24]

William Caferro of Vanderbilt University found The Swerve "an engaging portrait of the Renaissance sense of wonder and discovery" but was disquieted by the "firm distinction Greenblatt makes between the Renaissance and the Middle Ages" and the lack of reference to current scholarship.[25] Nevertheless, he concedes that "if Greenblatt leaves us with more questions than answers, it is ultimately not a grave flaw."[25]

References[edit]

  1. ^ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/bookreviews/8765691/The-Swerve-Howthe-Renaissance-Began-by-Stephan-Greenblatt-review.html
  2. ^ The 2012 Pulitzer Prize Winners: General Nonfiction, Columbia University, retrieved May 28, 2012
  3. ^ 2011 National Book Award Winner, Nonfiction, National Book Foundation, retrieved May 31, 2012
  4. ^ 'The Swerve': When an Ancient Text Reaches Out and Touches Us, PBS, May 25, 2012, retrieved May 31, 2012
  5. ^ Garner, Dwight (September 27, 2011), "An Unearthed Treasure That Changed Things", The New York Times, retrieved May 31, 2012
  6. ^ Owchar, Nick (November 20, 2011), "Book review: 'The Swerve: How the World Became Modern'", Los Angeles Times, retrieved May 31, 2012
  7. ^ a b Stephen Greenblatt, The Swerve: How the World Became Modern W. W. Norton & Company, p.14 ff.
  8. ^ Modern Language Association James Russell Lowell Prize [1]
  9. ^ Corrigan, Maureen (September 20, 2011). "'The Swerve': The Ideas That Rooted The Renaissance". NPR.org. Retrieved August 28, 2020.
  10. ^ a b Year-end Lists - 2011 Books [2]
  11. ^ Eric Liebetrau, Kirkus Reviews Best Non-Fiction of 2011, [3]
  12. ^ Maureen Corrigan, NPR Year-End Wrap-Up: The 10 Best Novels Of 2011, [4]
  13. ^ The Chicago Tribune's favorite books of 2011, [5]
  14. ^ Laurie Muchnick, King’s New Kennedy, Greenblatt Finds ’Swerve’ in Top 2011 Books, [6]
  15. ^ SFGate,Best books of 2011: 100 recommended books, [7]
  16. ^ American Library Association, 2012 Notable Books List: best in adult fiction, non-fiction and poetry, [8]
  17. ^ The Globe and Mail, The Globe's top 100 books of 2011 [9]
  18. ^ David Quint, The New Republic, Humanism As Revolution
  19. ^ Reno, R.R. (December 2011). "A Philosophy for the Powerful". First Things. Retrieved January 16, 2013.
  20. ^ Greenblatt, Stephen (July 2012). "Author's Response to Review of The Swerve: How the Renaissance Began, (review no. 1283)". Reviews in History. Institute of Historical Research.
  21. ^ Greenblatt, Stephen (July 2012). "Author's Response to Review of The Swerve: How the Renaissance Began, (review no. 1283)". Reviews in History. Institute of Historical Research.
  22. ^ Jim Hinch, The Los Angeles Review of Books, "Why Stephen Greenblatt is wrong and why it matters"
  23. ^ https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/stephen-greenblatts-the-swerve-reviewed-by-michael-dirda/2011/09/20/gIQA8WmVmK_story.html Stephen Greenblatt’s “The Swerve,” reviewed by Michael Dirda
  24. ^ Saetveit Miles, Laura. "Stephen Greenblatt's The Swerve racked up prizes — and completely misled you about the Middle Ages". Vox.com. Retrieved July 27, 2016.
  25. ^ a b William Caferro, "Review of The Swerve: How the Renaissance Began", Modern Philology (2013), v.111, online

External links[edit]