Theatrum Mundi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theatrum Mundi (or the Great Theater of the World) is a metaphorical concept developed throughout Western literature and thought, apparent in theories of the world such as Plato's Allegory of the Cave, and a popular idea in the Baroque Period among certain writers.[1] This metaphysical explanation of the world portrays the world as a theater (apparent in Shakespeare's saying that "all the world's a stage") wherein people are characters and their actions form a drama, with God as the author, specifically for some Christian thinkers. This metaphor can take various forms, some more deterministic than others, and has also been formulated in different fashions, such as the world as chess game by the Persian philosopher Omar Khayyam. In each formulation of the theatrum mundi, though, the world is a sum greater than its parts, where various roles are played by different actors.

History[edit]

The world as a stage was expressed among the ancient Greeks, and especially gained popularity among Stoic and Neoplantonist philosophers such as Plotinus in the late antiquity of the Roman Empire. In Neoplatonism, which went on to influence Christianity, the belief of the separate realm of the soul and its transcendence above the instability of worldly affairs influenced philosophers and later, important Christian figures like St. Augustine to view the world as a theatrical spectacle.

The relation of God to humanity and the world was expressed throughout the Middle Ages. John of Salisbury, a 12th-century theologian especially coined the term theatrum mundi, characterized by commenting that saints "despise the theater of this world from the heights of their virtue". In several chapters of the third book of his Policraticus, a moral encyclopedia, he meditates on the fact that "the life of man on earth is a comedy, where each forgetting his own plays another's role". The comedy takes place on the scene/in the world, while the auditorium is associated to the Christian paradise. Only a few sages, like some Stoic philosophers or the prophets like Abraham or John the Baptiste, are able to accept the role given by God. This acceptation allows to extract themselves from the theatrum mundi, to adopt a celestial position in the auditorium, and to watch and understand the roles played in the comedy[2].

The metaphor had intercourse with the actual theater, which could be conversely conceived as a world, or a microcosm. The idea continued to be expressed throughout the early modern period and became less of a strictly theological or philosophical metaphor and began to insert itself in various forms of literature and rhetorical expressions, and its use in certain times has been theorized to be a result of political and religious alienation, especially in the midst of tumultuous historical periods. It is possible that it gradually began to lose its religious connotations, and the theatrum mundi took on more of a secular, political aspect. But going back to Plato's emphasis in Laws of a protagonist embodying the ideal political subject by reflecting the ideal plane, this both political and theological formulation of theatrum mundiwas eventually propagated by Tertullian to the point where the sociological idea of roles descends from it as well. Additionally, it was also cultivated by the transition towards new social forms; for instance, the trappings of the feudal monarchy in England was seen as "empty" and "theatrical" because they occurred in the social context of an ascendant capitalism. It was in England, moreover, where the metaphor was the most developed, although it was also refined in Spain.

Transforming with the developments of philosophy and culture, the theatrum mundi became less popular in the 18th and 19th centuries, but more recently reconceptualizations have developed among Situationists and Jean Baudrillard, as well as Brecht, Beckett, and Artaud.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Hoffmeister, Gerhart (March 2009). "World as a Stage - Theatrum Mundi". The Literary Encyclopedia. 
  2. ^ John Gillies, Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference, Volume 4 of Cambridge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture, Cambridge University Press, 1994. ISBN 9780521458535. Pages 76-77.

Further reading[edit]

Quiring, Bjorn. Revisions of the Theatrum Mundi Metaphor in Early Modern England. De Gruyter, 2014.