Theda Skocpol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Theda Skocpol
Theda Skocpol speaking about the Tea Party at the Munk School.jpg
Theda Skocpol speaking about the Tea Party at the Munk School
Born (1947-05-04) May 4, 1947 (age 69)
Detroit, Michigan
Residence Cambridge, MA
Citizenship U.S.A.
Nationality American
Fields Civic engagement,
Comparative sociology,
Historical institutionalism
Institutions Harvard University
Alma mater Michigan State University (B.A.)
Harvard University (M.A.) and (Ph.D.)
Academic advisors Barrington Moore, Jr.
Known for  • States and Social Revolutions
 • Diminished Democracy
 • State Autonomy Theory
Notable awards Johan Skytte Prize

Theda Skocpol (born May 4, 1947) is an American sociologist and political scientist author who teaches at Harvard University. Dr. Skocpol is currently serving as the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology.

Dr. Skocpol is influential in sociology as an advocate of the historical-institutional and comparative approaches. She is well known in political science for her "state autonomy theory." Skocpol has written widely for both popular and academic audiences. She has written and/or edited dozens of scholarly books, publications, journals, and articles. Skocpol's works and opinions have been associated with the structuralist school. As an example, she argues that social revolutions can best be explained given their relation with specific structures of agricultural societies and their respective states.

Dr. Skocpol gives equal importance to the role of international forces, especially their influence on state and social structures of a given society. Such an approach differs greatly from more "behaviorist" ones, which tend to emphasize the role of "revolutionary populations," "revolutionary psychology," and/or "revolutionary consciousness," as determinant factors of revolutionary processes.

Biography[edit]

Theda Skocpol was born in Detroit, Michigan on May 4, 1947. She earned her B.A. at Michigan State University in 1969. She then went on to earn her M.A. (1972), and Ph.D. at Harvard University (1975). While attending Harvard University, Skocpol studied with with Barrington Moore Jr.

From 1975-1981, Skocpol served as an Assistant and Associate Professor of Sociology, at Harvard University. During this time, Skocpol published her first of many books, this one called States and Social Revolutions: A comparative Analysis of Social Revolutions in Russia Russia, France and China (1979).

Some of her subsequent work focused on methodology and theory, including the co-edited volume Bringing the State Back In, which heralded a new focus by social scientists on the state as an agent of social and political change.

In 1981, Skocpol moved on to work at the University of Chicago. For the next five years, Skocpol would serve as an Associate Professor of Sociology and Political Science, and of Social Science, Professor of Sociology and Political Science, and Director for the Center for the Study of Industrial Societies[1]

From 1986 to the present, Skocpol has held various positions at Harvard University to include: Professor of Sociology; Director for the Center for American Political Studies; Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences; and presently is the Professor of Government and of Sociology, Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology

According to her profile on the John F. Kennedy School of Government website, she studies “inequality in American society, women and public policy, and the development of voluntary associations in U.S. history to elucidate recent transformations within the American policy.”[2]

Personal Life[edit]

In 1967, while studying at Michigan State University, Skocpol married Bill Skocpol, a physicist who taught at Boston University. Skocpol and her husband had one child, Michael Skocpol (born 1988). Michael Skocpol is a graduate of Brown University, and is currently in his final year of study at Stanford Law School (class of 2016). Theda Skocpol currently lives and works in Cambridge, Ma (USA).

Controversy[edit]

In the early 1980s, Prof. Skocpol publicly alleged that Harvard University had denied her tenure (1980) because she was a woman. This charge was found to be justified by an internal review committee in 1981.[3] In 1984, Harvard University offered Dr. Skocpol a tenured position (its first ever for a female sociologist), which she accepted.

Honors and Titles[edit]

Throughout her career, Dr. Skocpol has held many positions at various academic, and professional organizations, some of which include: President of Politics and History Section, Chairperson, and later Council member of the American Political Science Association (1991-96). Out of over one hundred past presidents, since 1903, only about ten women have held that office. Skocpol is also Founder and Co-Editor, Princeton Studies in American Politics: Historical, Comparative, and International Perspectives (1993 – present); and Senior Advisor in the Social Sciences, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study (2006-2008).

According to her Curriculum Vitae Skocpol has been distinguished by over twenty awards and honors, some of which are: C. Wright Mills Award of the The Society for the Study of Social Problems (1979); Woodrow Wilson Foundation Award of the American Political Science Association (1993); Elected to the American Philosophical Society (2006); and she was elected to the National Academy of Sciences (2008).

In 2007, Prof. Skocpol was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science, one of the world's most prestigious prizes in political science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence."[4] [5]Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science (2007).

State Autonomy Theory[edit]

Before she wrote Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, Skocpol first devised what she termed State Autonomy Theory. This theory underlined the idea that state bureaucracies could have the potential for autonomous operations, and that this potential was ignored by scientists who were focused on society-centric studies. Skocpol considers the idea that parties are more important in America than the government, and that class dominance plays heavily into American politics.

States and Social Revolutions (1979)[edit]

Dr. Skocpol’s most famous book, States and Social Revolutions: A comparative Analysis of Social Revolutions in Russia, France and China (1979), discusses how most theories account only for direct action in bringing about revolutions. Social Revolutions are fast-paced foundational transformations of society's state and class structures. She includes the structure involved in creating a revolutionary situation that can lead to a social revolution - one that changes civic institutions and government once the administration and military branches collapse.

In her text, Skocpol "offers a framework of reference for analyzing social-revolutionary transformations in modern world history" and discusses and compares the causes of The "French Revolution" of 1787-1800, The Russian Revolution of 1917-1921, and The Chinese Revolution of 1911-1949.

According to Skocpol, there are two stages to social revolutions: a crisis of state and the emergence of a dominant class to take advantage of a revolutionary situation. The crisis of state emerges from poor economy, natural disaster, food shortage, or security concerns. Leaders of the revolution also have to face these constraints, and their handling of them affects how well they re-establish the state.

Skocpol uses Marxism’s class struggle to assert that the main causes of social unrest are state social structures, international competitive pressures, international demonstrations, and class relations. Critics suggest that Skocpol ignores the role of individuals and ideology[6] and uses varied comparative methodological strategies.

Protecting Soldiers and Mothers (1992)[edit]

In this book, Skocpol considers increased benefits for Civil War veterans and their families resulting from competitive party politics, as well as greater actions taken in women's movements. Soldiers and mothers benefited from social spending, labor regulations, and health education through reformative women's clubs across the nation. Simultaneously, Skocpol refutes her claim that theorists had ignored states' independent power in her state autonomy theory, explaining "my state-centered theoretical frame of reference had evolved into a fully 'polity-centered approach,' meaning that social movements, coalitions of pressure groups, and political parties must be given their due in understanding power in America."

Dr. Skocpol explains how clubs and associations fill the vacuum left by fewer bureaucracies and an official church throughout the country, offering a case study in how women succeeded in gaining labor rights, pensions, minimum wage, and subsidized natal health clinics. Further, Skocpol points out that women were able to overcome class disparity to achieve these goals, working at a national level, influencing representatives with books, TV, magazines, and meetings.[7]

Diminished Democracy (2003)[edit]

Diminished Democracy discusses the changes in US public involvement and its recent concerning decline. Skocpol talks about how to reverse it in explaining how the U.S. became a civic nation, the organizers of that movement, management of civic organizations, changes in them, the harmful effects of that change, and how to recreate a sense of citizenship.

Since fewer and fewer Americans join voluntary groups that meet frequently, there has been a proliferation of nonprofit groups led by elites who can interact with the government, but not the people. Dr. Skocpol provokes the reader with the idea that civic involvement will one day become another job rather than a civilian responsibility.

See also[edit]

Published works[edit]

  • A Critical Review of Barrington Moore’s Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Politics and Society, 4(1), pp. 1–34
  • Skocpol, Theda. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Review article: "Cultural Idioms and Political Ideologies in the Revolutionary Reconstruction of State Power: A Rejoinder to Sewell," The Journal of Modern History Vol. 57, No. 1, March 1985
  • Skocpol, Theda. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Skocpol, Theda. (1994). Social Revolutions in the Modern World. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Skocpol, Theda. (1995). Social Policy in the United States: Future Possibilities in Historical Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Skocpol, Theda. (1995). State and Party in America's New Deal. With Kenneth Finegold. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Skocpol, Theda. (1996). Boomerang: Clinton's Health Security Effort and the Turn Against Government in U.S. Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Skocpol, Theda. (1997). Boomerang: Health Reform and the Turn Against Government. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Skocpol, Theda. (2000). The Missing Middle: Working Families and the Future of American Social Policy. A Century Foundation Book. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Skocpol, Theda. (2003). Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Rothbaum Series. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Skocpol, Theda. (2006). What a Mighty Power We Can Be: African American Fraternal Groups and the Struggle for Racial Equality. (with Ariane Liazos & Marshall Ganz) Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Skocpol, Theda. (2011). The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism, (with Vanessa Williamson) Oxford University Press, 2011.[8] Reprinted April, 2013
  • Skocpol, Theda. (2012). Obama and America’s Political Future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  • Skocpol, Theda, and Vanessa Williamson. (2013). The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Edited[edit]

  • Marxist Inquiries: Studies of Labor, Class, and States (with Michael Burawoy), University of Chicago Press (Chicago, IL), 1982.
  • Vision and Method in Historical Sociology, Cambridge University Press, 1984.
  • Bringing the State Back In (with Peter B. Evans and Dietrich Rueschemeyer), Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  • The Politics of Social Policy in the United States (with Margaret Weir and Ann Shola Orloff), Princeton University Press, 1988.
  • American Society and Politics: Institutional, Historical, and Theoretical Perspectives (with John L. Campbell), McGraw-Hill (New York), 1995.
  • States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies (with Dietrich Rueschemeyer), Princeton University Press, 1996.
  • The New Majority: Toward a Popular Progressive Politics (with Stan Greenberg), Yale University Press (New Haven, CT), 1997.
  • Democracy, Revolution, and History (with George Ross, Tony Smith, and Judith Eisenberg Vichniac), Cornell University Press (Ithaca, NY), 1998.
  • Civic Engagement in American Democracy (with Morris P. Fiorina), Brookings Institution Press (Washington, DC)/Russell Sage Foundation (New York City), 1999.
  • The Transformation of American Politics. Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism (with Paul Pierson), Princeton University Press, 2007.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Skocpol, Theda. Theda Skocpol (PDF). Harvard University http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/thedaskocpol/files/skocpol_cv_2009.pdf. Retrieved 7/10/16.  Check date values in: |access-date= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. ^ "Harvard Bio". 
  3. ^ "A QUESTION OF SEX BIAS AT HARVARD". http://www.nytimes.com/. The New York Times. Retrieved 17 July 2014.  External link in |website= (help)
  4. ^ "Theda Skocpol". Theda Skocpol. Harvard University. Retrieved June 26, 2016. 
  5. ^ http://www.svd.se/dynamiskt/kultur/did_14913020.asp
  6. ^ Wikisum. "States and Social Revolutions". 
  7. ^ Domhoff, G. "Who Rules America". 
  8. ^ The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism

External links[edit]