Therapeutic ultrasound

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Therapeutic ultrasound
ICD-10-PCS6A7
ICD-9-CM00.0

Therapeutic ultrasound refers generally to any type of ultrasonic procedure that uses ultrasound for therapeutic benefit. Physiotherapeutic ultrasound was introduced into clinical practice in the 1950s, with lithotripsy introduced in the 1980s. Others are at various stages in transitioning from research to clinical use: HIFU, targeted ultrasound drug delivery, trans-dermal ultrasound drug delivery, ultrasound hemostasis, cancer therapy, and ultrasound assisted thrombolysis[1][2] It may use focused ultrasound (FUS) or unfocused ultrasound.

In the above applications, the ultrasound passes through human tissue where it is the main source of the observed biological effect (the oscillation of abrasive dental tools at ultrasonic frequencies therefore do not belong to this class). The ultrasound within tissue consists of very high frequency sound waves, between 800,000 Hz and 20,000,000 Hz, which cannot be heard by humans.

There is some evidence that ultrasound is more effective than placebo treatment for treating patients with arthritis pain,[3] a range of musculoskeletal injuries[4] and for promoting tissue healing.[5]

Medical uses[edit]

Relatively high power ultrasound can break up stony deposits or tissue, accelerate the effect of drugs in a targeted area, assist in the measurement of the elastic properties of tissue, and can be used to sort cells or small particles for research.

  • Focused high-energy ultrasound pulses can be used to break calculi such as kidney stones and gallstones into fragments small enough to be passed from the body without undue difficulty, a process known as lithotripsy.
  • Focused ultrasound sources may be used for cataract treatment by phacoemulsification.
  • Ultrasound can ablate tumors or other tissue non-invasively. This is accomplished using a technique known as High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU), also called focused ultrasound surgery (FUS surgery). This procedure uses generally lower frequencies than medical diagnostic ultrasound (250–2000 kHz), but significantly higher time-averaged intensities. The treatment is often guided by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); the combination is then referred to as Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS).
Enhanced drug uptake using acoustic targeted drug delivery (ATDD).
  • Delivering chemotherapy to brain cancer cells and various drugs to other tissues is called acoustic targeted drug delivery (ATDD).[6] These procedures generally use high frequency ultrasound (1–10 MHz) and a range of intensities (0–20 W/cm2). The acoustic energy is focused on the tissue of interest to agitate its matrix and make it more permeable for therapeutic drugs.[7]
  • Ultrasound has been used to trigger the release of anti-cancer drugs from delivery vectors including liposomes, polymeric microspheres and self-assembled polymeric.[1]
  • Ultrasound is essential to the procedures of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy and endovenous laser treatment for the non-surgical treatment of varicose veins.
  • Ultrasound-assisted lipectomy is Liposuction assisted by ultrasound.

There are three potential effects of ultrasound. The first is the increase in blood flow in the treated area.[citation needed] The second is the decrease in pain from the reduction of swelling and edema[citation needed]. The third is the gentle massage of muscle tendons and/ or ligaments in the treated area because no strain is added and any scar tissue is softened[citation needed]. These three benefits are achieved by two main effects of therapeutic ultrasound. The two types of effects are: thermal and non thermal effects. Thermal effects are due to the absorption of the sound waves. Non thermal effects are from cavitation, microstreaming and acoustic streaming.[1]

Cavitational effects result from the vibration of the tissue causing microscopic bubbles to form, which transmit the vibrations in a way that directly stimulates cell membranes. This physical stimulation appears to enhance the cell-repair effects of the inflammatory response.

History[edit]

The first large scale application of ultrasound was around World War II. Sonar systems were being built and used to navigate submarines. It was realized that the high intensity ultrasound waves that they were using were heating and killing fish.[8] This led to research in tissue heating and healing effects. Since the 1940s, ultrasound has been used by physical and occupational therapists for therapeutic effects.

Physical therapy[edit]

Ultrasound is applied using a transducer or applicator that is in direct contact with the patient's skin. Gel is used on all surfaces of the head to reduce friction and assist transmission of the ultrasonic waves. Therapeutic ultrasound in physical therapy is alternating compression and rarefaction of sound waves with a frequency of 0.7 to 3.3 MHz. Maximum energy absorption in soft tissue occurs from 2 to 5 cm. Intensity decreases as the waves penetrate deeper. They are absorbed primarily by connective tissue: ligaments, tendons, and fascia (and also by scar tissue).[9]

Conditions for which ultrasound may be used for treatment include the following examples: ligament sprains, muscle strains, tendonitis, joint inflammation, plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia, facet irritation, impingement syndrome, bursitis, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and scar tissue adhesion. There is no evidence to support the use of ultrasound for the treatment of low back pain,[10] and current clinical guidelines recommend that ultrasound is not used for this condition.[11] Ultrasound used for calcific tendonitis had a positive short term effect. For the long term, there was no significant difference with ultrasound use. This shows that for pain relief and short-term treatment ultrasound can be an effective treatment for Calcific Tendonitis[12] A review with five small placebo‐controlled trials from 2011, did not support the use of ultrasound in the treatment of acute ankle sprains and the potential treatment effects of ultrasound appear to be generally small and of probably of limited clinical importance, especially in the context of the usually short‐term recovery period for these injuries.[13] A meta-analysis found that ultrasound therapy is effective in reducing pain, increasing ROM, and reducing WOMAC functional scores in patients with knee osteoarthritis.[14]

Research tools[edit]

Research[edit]

  • Using ultrasound to generate cellular effects in soft tissue has fallen out of favor as research has shown a lack of efficacy[16] and a lack of scientific basis for proposed biophysical effects.[17]
  • According to a 2017 meta-analysis and associated practice guideline, Low intensity pulsed ultrasound should no longer been used for bone regeneration because high quality clinical studies failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit.[18][19]
  • An additional effect of low-intensity ultrasound could be its potential to disrupt the blood–brain barrier for drug delivery.[20]
  • Transcranial ultrasound is being tested for use in aiding tissue plasminogen activator treatment in stroke patients in the procedure called ultrasound-enhanced systemic thrombolysis.
  • Ultrasound has been shown to act synergistically with antibiotics in killing bacteria.[21]
  • Ultrasound has been postulated to allow thicker eukaryotic cell tissue cultures by promoting nutrient penetration.[22]
  • Long-duration therapeutic ultrasound called sustained acoustic medicine is a daily slow-release therapy that can be applied to increase local circulation and theoretically accelerates healing of musculoskeletal tissues after an injury.[23] However, there is some evidence to suggest this may not be effective.[16]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Mo S, Coussios CC, Seymour L, Carlisle R (December 2012). "Ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery for cancer". Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 9 (12): 1525–1538. doi:10.1517/17425247.2012.739603. PMID 23121385. S2CID 31178343.
  2. ^ "Therapeutic Ultrasound: A Promising Future in Clinical Medicine". Archived from the original on October 12, 2007.
  3. ^ Wu Y, Zhu S, Lv Z, Kan S, Wu Q, Song W, et al. (December 2019). "Effects of therapeutic ultrasound for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Clinical Rehabilitation. 33 (12): 1863–1875. doi:10.1177/0269215519866494. PMID 31382781. S2CID 199452082.
  4. ^ Uddin SM, Komatsu DE, Motyka T, Petterson S (June 2021). "Low-Intensity Continuous Ultrasound Therapies—A Systematic Review of Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives". Journal of Clinical Medicine. 10 (12): 2698. doi:10.3390/jcm10122698. PMC 8235587. PMID 34207333.
  5. ^ Leighton R, Phillips M, Bhandari M, Zura R (June 2021). "Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) use for the management of instrumented, infected, and fragility non-unions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of healing proportions". BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 22 (1): 532. doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04322-5. PMC 8196464. PMID 34116673.
  6. ^ Lewis GK, Olbricht WL, Lewis GK (February 2008). "Acoustically enhanced Evans blue dye perfusion in neurological tissues". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2 (1): 20001–200017. doi:10.1121/1.2890703. PMC 3011869. PMID 21197390.
  7. ^ Lewis GK, Olbricht W (2007). A phantom feasibility study of acoustic enhanced drug delivery to neurological tissue. p. 67. doi:10.1109/LSSA.2007.4400886. ISBN 978-1-4244-1812-1. S2CID 31498698.
  8. ^ Woo J. "A short History of the development of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology". esource Discovery Network, University of Oxford. Retrieved March 12, 2012.
  9. ^ Watson T (2006). "Therapeutic Ultrasound". herapeutic Ultrasound on the web. Archived from the original on 2007-08-21.
  10. ^ Ebadi, Safoora; Henschke, Nicholas; Forogh, Bijan; Nakhostin Ansari, Noureddin; van Tulder, Maurits W; Babaei-Ghazani, Arash; Fallah, Ehsan (2020-07-05). Cochrane Back and Neck Group (ed.). "Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020 (7): CD009169. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009169.pub3. PMC 7390505. PMID 32623724.
  11. ^ National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016). Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management. Manchester: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). ISBN 978-1-4731-2186-7. OCLC 1198756858.
  12. ^ Pieber, Karin; Grim-Stieger, Martina; Kainberger, Franz; Funovics, Martin; Resch, Karl-Ludwig; Bochdansky, Thomas; Pablik, Eleonore; Ebenbichler, Gerold (September 2018). "Long-Term Course of Shoulders After Ultrasound Therapy for Calcific Tendinitis: Results of the 10-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial". American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 97 (9): 651–658. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000000939. ISSN 1537-7385. PMID 29613883. S2CID 4614904.
  13. ^ van den Bekerom MP, van der Windt DA, Ter Riet G, van der Heijden GJ, Bouter LM (June 2011). "Therapeutic ultrasound for acute ankle sprains". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (6): CD001250. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001250.pub2. PMC 7088449. PMID 21678332.
  14. ^ Wu, Yu; Zhu, Shibo; Lv, Zenghui; Kan, Shunli; Wu, Qiuli; Song, Wenye; Ning, Guangzhi; Feng, Shiqing (December 2019). "Effects of therapeutic ultrasound for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Clinical Rehabilitation. 33 (12): 1863–1875. doi:10.1177/0269215519866494. ISSN 0269-2155. PMID 31382781. S2CID 199452082.
  15. ^ Constans C, Ahnine H, Santin M, Lehericy S, Tanter M, Pouget P, Aubry JF (February 2020). "Non-invasive ultrasonic modulation of visual evoked response by GABA delivery through the blood brain barrier". Journal of Controlled Release. 318: 223–231. bioRxiv 10.1101/351270. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.006. PMID 31816362. S2CID 209164551.
  16. ^ a b Robertson VJ, Baker KG (July 2001). "A review of therapeutic ultrasound: effectiveness studies". Physical Therapy. 81 (7): 1339–1350. doi:10.1093/ptj/81.7.1339. PMID 11444997.
  17. ^ Baker KG, Robertson VJ, Duck FA (July 2001). "A review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects". Physical Therapy. 81 (7): 1351–1358. doi:10.1093/ptj/81.7.1351. PMID 11444998.
  18. ^ Schandelmaier S, Kaushal A, Lytvyn L, Heels-Ansdell D, Siemieniuk RA, Agoritsas T, et al. (February 2017). "Low intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone healing: systematic review of randomized controlled trials". BMJ. 356: j656. doi:10.1136/bmj.j656. PMC 5484179. PMID 28348110.
  19. ^ Poolman RW, Agoritsas T, Siemieniuk RA, Harris IA, Schipper IB, Mollon B, et al. (February 2017). "Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) for bone healing: a clinical practice guideline". BMJ. 356: j576. doi:10.1136/bmj.j576. PMID 28228381.
  20. ^ Vlachos F, Tung YS, Konofagou E (September 2011). "Permeability dependence study of the focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening at distinct pressures and microbubble diameters using DCE-MRI". Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 66 (3): 821–830. doi:10.1002/mrm.22848. PMC 3919956. PMID 21465543.
  21. ^ Carmen JC, Roeder BL, Nelson JL, Beckstead BL, Runyan CM, Schaalje GB, et al. (April 2004). "Ultrasonically enhanced vancomycin activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms in vivo". Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 18 (4): 237–245. doi:10.1177/0885328204040540. PMC 1361255. PMID 15070512.
  22. ^ Pitt WG, Ross SA (2003). "Ultrasound increases the rate of bacterial cell growth". Biotechnology Progress. 19 (3): 1038–1044. doi:10.1021/bp0340685. PMC 1361254. PMID 12790676.
  23. ^ Rigby JH, Taggart RM, Stratton KL, Lewis GK, Draper DO (November 2015). "Intramuscular Heating Characteristics of Multihour Low-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound". Journal of Athletic Training. 50 (11): 1158–1164. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-50.11.03. PMC 4732395. PMID 26509683.

External links[edit]