Thrinaxodon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Thrinaxodon
Temporal range: Early Triassic, 252–247 Ma
Thrinaxodon Lionhinus.jpg
Thrinaxodon liorhinus
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Synapsida
Order: Therapsida
Suborder: Cynodontia
Family: Thrinaxodontidae
Genus: Thrinaxodon
Seeley, 1894
Species
  • T. liorhinus Seeley, 1894 (type)

Thrinaxodon is an extinct genus of cynodont, most commonly regarded by its species T. liorhinus which lived in what are now South Africa and Antarctica. Thrinaxodon has been dated between the Permian and mid-Triassic periods, indicating that it was one of the few species to survive the Permian mass extinction. Its survival may have been due to its burrowing habits.[1]

Similar to other mammalian-like reptiles, Thrinaxodon adopted a semi-sprawling posture, an intermediary form between the sprawling position of pelycosaurs (not unlike current Crocodylia) and the more upright posture present in current mammals.[2] Thrinaxodon is prevalent in the fossil record due in part to that fact that it was one of the few carnivores of its time, and was of a larger size than similar cynodont carnivores.[3] It was a small reptile ranging in size between 30 cm and 50 cm.

Description[edit]

Restoration of Thrinaxodon
Thrinaxodon liorhinus in CosmoCaixa Barcelona
The skull of Thrinaxodon liorhinus (AMNH 5630) in the American Museum of Natural History, from South Africa
Vertebrae and ribs of Thrinaxodon liorhinus (AMNH 9516) in the American Museum of Natural History, from Antarctica
3D reconstruction of a Thrinaxodon liorhinus skeleton found in the same burrow with a Broomistega amphibian (synchrotron imaging).[4]

Thrinaxodon was a small mammal-like reptile roughly the size of a fox[1] with hair presumably growing between its scales. The dentition suggests that it was a carnivore, focusing its diet mostly on insects, small herbivores and invertebrates. Their unique secondary palate successfully separated the nasal passages from the rest of the mouth, allowing the Thrinaxodon to continue mastication without interrupting to breath, an adaptation important for digestion.[3]

The bone histology of Thrinaxodon indicates that it most likely had very rapid bone growth during juvenile development, and much slower development throughout adulthood, giving us the idea that Thrinaxodon reached peak size very early in its life.[5]

Thrinaxodon has been identified as a burrowing cynodont by numerous discoveries in preserved burrow hollows. There is evidence that the burrows are in fact built by the Thrinaxodon to live in them, and they do not simply inhabit leftover burrows by other creatures. Pitted foramina on the snout of Thrinaxodon indicate the likely presence of the sensory organ, whiskers, an adaptation likely used to assistance navigation and sensation within burrows. Due to the evolution of a segmented vertebral column into thoracic, lumbar and sacral vertebrae, Thrinaxodon was able to achieve flexibilities that permitted it to comfortable rest within smaller burrows, which may have led to habits such as aestivation or torpor. This evolution of a segmented rib cage gives us the idea that this may have been the first instance of a diaphragm in the synapsid fossil record, however, without the proper soft tissue impressions this is nothing more than an assumption.[3][6][7]

Current fossil evidence restricts the geographic location of T. liorhinus to South Africa and Antarctica. The discovery of T. liorhinus in these incredibly separated land masses has been used as evidentiary support that Africa and Antarctica were linked land masses during the late Permian and early Triassic.[8]

Paleobiology[edit]

Cranial anatomy[edit]

Snout[edit]

The nasals of Thrinaxodon are pitted with a large number of foramina, giving the impression that this mammal-like reptile had whiskers. The nasals narrow anteriorly and expand anteriorly and articulate directly with the frontals, pre-frontals and lacrimals, however, there is no interaction with the jugals or the orbitals. The maxilla of Thrinaxodon is also heavily pitted with foramina.[9]

Skull roof and temporal region[edit]

On the skull roof of Thrinaxodon the fronto-nasal suture represents an arrow shape instead of the general transverse process seen in more primitive skull morphologies. The prefrontals, which are slightly anterior and ventral to the frontals exhibit a very small size and come in contact with the post-orbitals, frontals, nasals and lacrimals. More posteriorly on the skull, the parietals lack a sagittal crest. The cranial roof is the narrowest just posterior to the parietal foramen, which is very nearly circular in shaped. The temporal crests remain quite discrete throughout the length of the skull. The temporal fenestra have been found with ossified fasciae, giving evidence of some type of a temporal muscle attachment.[9]

Upper jaw[edit]

The upper jaw contains a secondary palate which separates the nasal passages from the rest of the mouth, which would have given Thrinaxodon the ability to breathe uninterrupted, even if food had been kept in its mouth. This adaptation would have allowed the Thrinaxodon to mash its food to a greater extent decreasing the amount of time necessary for digestion. The maxillae and palatines meet medially in the upper jaw developing a midline suture. The maxillopalatine suture also includes a posterior palatine foramen. The large palatal roof component of the vomer in Thrinaxodon is just dorsal to the choana, or interior nasal passages. The pterygoid bones extend in the upper jaw and enclose small interpterygoid vacuities that are present on each side of the cultriform processes of the parasphenoids. The parasphenoid and basisphenoid are fused, except for the most anterior/dorsal end of the fused bones, in which there is a slight separation in the trabecular attachment of the basisphenoid.[9]

Otic region[edit]

The otic region is defined by the regions surrounding the temporal fenestrae. Most notable is that we have obtained evidence of a deep recess that is just anterior to the fenestra ovalis, this recess contains evidence of smooth muscle interactions with the skull. Such smooth muscle interactions have been interpreted to be indicative of the tympanum and give the implications that this recess, in conjunction with the fenestra ovalis, outline the origin of the ear in Thrinaxodon. This is a new synapomorphy as this physiology had arisen in Thrinaxodon and had been conserved through late Cynodontia. The stapes contained a heavy cartilage plug, which was fit into the sides of the fenestra ovalis, however only one half of the articular end of the stapes was able to cover the fenestra ovalis. The remainder of this pit opens to an “un-ossified” region which comes somewhat close to the cochlear recess, giving one the assumption that inner ear articulation occurred directly within this region.[9]

Transitional data[edit]

A side note on the skull of Thrinaxodon is that is an important transitional fossil, in a study centering on the idea that over time synapsid skulls become more simple, by reducing the total number of bones found in the skulls. The most notable jump in bone number reduction had occurred between Thrinaxodon and clade Probainognathus, a change so dramatic that it is most likely that our fossil record is currently incomplete between these two clades. With that being said, it must be noted that Thrinaxodon does in fact contain a fewer number of bones in the skull than that of its Pelycosaur ancestors.[10]

Ontogeny[edit]

According to a recent study, there appear to be nine cranial features that successfully separate Thrinaxodon into four ontogenetic stages. The paper denotes that in general, the Thrinaxodon skull increased in size isometrically, except for four regions, one of which being the optic region. Much of the data assumes that the length of the sagittal crest increased at a greater rate in relation to the rest of the skull. The posterior sagittal crest to appear in an earlier ontogenetic stage than the more anterior crest had, and in conjunction with the dorsal deposition of bone, a unified sagittal crest had developed rather than having a single suture span the entire length of the skull.[11]

Dentition[edit]

Data on the dentition of Thrinaxodon liorhinus was compiled by use of a micro CT scanner on a large sample of Thrinaxodon skulls, ranging between 30–96 mm in length. It is important to note that these dentition patterns are similar to that of Morganucodon, allowing us to make the assumption that these dentition patterns arose within Thrinaxodontidae and extended into the records of early Mammalia.[12]

Dental pattern[edit]

Adult T. liorhinus assumes the dental pattern of the 4 incisors, 1 canine and 6 postcanines on each side of the upper jaw. This pattern is reflected in the lower jaw by a dental formula of 3 incisors, 1 canine and 7-8 postcanines on each side of the lower jaw. With this formula, we can make a small note that in general, adult Thrinaxodon contained anywhere between 44 and 46 total teeth.[13]

Incisors[edit]

Upper incisors in T. liorhinus assume a backwards directed cusp, and they go from being curved and pointed at their most distal point, and become broader and rounder as they reach their proximal insertion point into the premaxilla. The fourth upper incisor greatly resembles the form of that of a small canine, however it is positioned too far anteriorly to be a functional canine. Lower incisors possess a very broad base, which is progressively reduced, heading distally towards the tip of the tooth. The lingual face of the lower incisors are most often concave while the labial face is often convex, and these lower incisors are oriented anteriorly, except in some cases for the third lower incisor, which can assume a more dorsoventral orientation.[12]

Canines[edit]

Canines are, for the most part, single functional teeth encompassing a broad, cone-like morphology. The canines of T. liorhinus possess small dorsoventrally directed facets on their surfaces, by our understanding, these facets are related to occlusion. Each canine possesses a replacement canine located within the jaw, posterior to the existing canine, neither of the replacement or functional canine teeth possess any serrated margins only the small facets. It is important to note that the lower canine is directed almost vertically (dorsoventrally) while the upper canine is directed slightly anteriorly.[12]

Postcanines[edit]

The upper and lower postcanines in T. liorhinus share some common features but also vary quite a fair amount in comparison to one another. It should be noted that the first postcanine (just posterior to the canine) is most often smaller than the other postcanines and is most often bicuspid. Including the first postcanine, if any of the other postcanines are bicuspid, then it is safe to assume that the posterior accessary cusp is present and that that tooth will not have any cingular or labial cusps. If however, the tooth is tricuspid, then there is a chance of cingular cusps developing, if this occurs then the anterior cusp will be the first to appear and will be the most pronounced cusp. In the upper postcanines, there should be no occurrence of any teeth possessing more than 3 cusps, and there is no occurrence of any labial cusps on the upper postcanines. The majority of upper postcanines in the juvenile Thrinaxodon are bicuspid, while only one of these upper teeth are tricuspid. The upper postcanines of an intermediate (between juvenile and adult) Thrinaxodon are all tricuspid with no labial or cingular cusps. The adult upper postcanines retain the intermediate physiologies and possess only tricuspid teeth, however, it is possible for cingular cusps to develop in these adult teeth. The ultimate (posterior-most) upper canine is often the smallest of all canines in the entire jaw system. Little data is known of the juvenile and intermediate forms of the lower postcanines in Thrinaxodon, but the adult lower postcanines all possess multiple (any value more than three) cusps as well as the only appearance of labial cusps. Some older specimens have been found that possess no multiple-cups lower canines, possibly a response to old age or teeth replacement.[12]

Tooth replacement[edit]

It is very important to see that Thrinaxodon shows one of the first occurrences of replacement (essentially baby) teeth in cynodonts. This was discerned by the presence of replacement pits, which are situated lingual to the functional tooth in the incisors and postcanines. While a replacement canine does exist, more often than not it is not erupted and the original functional canine remains.[12]

Bone histology[edit]

The bone tissue of Thrinaxodon consists of fibro-lamellar bone, to a varying degree across all the separate limbs, most of which develops into parallel-fibred bone tissue towards the periphery. Each of the bones contains a large abundance of globular osteocyte lacunae which radiate a multitude of branched canaliculi. Ontogenetically early bones, of which are mostly fibro-lamellar tissue, possessed a large amount of vascular canals. These canals are oriented longitudinally within primary osteons that contain radial anastomoses. Regions consisting mostly of parallel-fibred bone tissue contain few simple vascular canals, in comparison to the nearby fibro-lamellar tissues. Parallel-fibred peripheral bone tissue are indicative that bone growth began to slow, and they bring about the assumption that this change in growth was due to the age of the specimen in question. Combine this with the greater organization of osteocyte lacunae in the periphery of adult T. liorhinus, and we approach the assumption that this creature grew very quickly in order to reach adulthood at an accelerated rate. Before Thrinaxodon ontogenical patterns such as this had not been seen until cynodontia that roamed the early to mid-Triassic and was absent in permian to Triassic therapsids; stablishing the idea that reaching peak size as fast as possible was adaptively advantageous, and had arisen with Thrinaxodon, and preserved throughout the fossil record henceforth.[14]

Femur[edit]

Within the femur of Thrinaxodon there is no major region of the bone that is made of parallel-fibred tissues, however, there is a small ring of parallel-fibred bone within the mid-cortex. The remainder of the femur is made of fibro-lamellar tissue, however the globular osteocyte lacunae become much more organized and the primary osteons assume less vasculature than many other bones as you begin to approach the subperiosteal surface. The femur contains very few bony trabeculae.[5]

Humerus[edit]

The Thrinaxodon humerus differs from the femur in many regards, one of which being that there is a more extensive network of bony trabeculae in the humerus near the meduallary cavity of the bone. The globular osteocyte lacunae become more flattened as you get closer and closer to the midshaft of the humerus. While the vasculature is present, the humerus contains no secondary osteons.[5]

Radii and ulnae[edit]

The radii and ulnae of Thrinaxodon represent roughly the same histological patterns. In contrast to the humerii and femora, the parallel-fibred region is far more distinct in the distal bones of the forelimb. The medullary cavities are surrounded by multiple layers of very poorly vascularized endosteal lamellar tissue, along with very large cavities near the medullary cavity of the metaphyses.[5]

Posture[edit]

The posture of Thrinaxodon is an interesting subject, due to the fact that it represents a transition between the sprawling behavior of the more lizard-like pelycosaurs and the more upright behavior found in modern, and many extinct, Mammalia. In cynodonts such as Thrinaxodon, the distal femoral condyle articulates with the acetabulum in a way that permits the hindlimb to present itself at a 45 degree angle to the rest of the system. This is a large difference in comparison to the distal femoral condyle of pelycosaurs, which permits the femur to be parallel with the ground, forcing them to assume a sprawling-like posture.[2] More interesting is that there is an adaptation that has only been observed within Thrinaxodontidae, which allows them to assume upright posture, similar to that of early Mammalia, within their burrows.[7] These changes in posture are supported by the physiological changes in the torso of Thrinaxodon. Such changes as the first appearance of a segmented rib compartment, in which Thrinaxodon expresses both thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. The thoracic segment of the vertebrae contain ribs with large intercostal plates that most likely assisted with either protection or supporting the main frame of the back. This newly developed arrangement allowed for the appropriate space for a diaphragm, however, without proper soft tissue records, the presence of a diaphragm is purely speculative.[6]

Burrowing[edit]

The earliest discovery of a burrowing Thrinaxodon places the specimen found around 251 million years ago, a time frame surrounding the Permian-Triassic Mass Extinction. Much of these fossils had been found in the flood plains of South Africa, in the Karoo Basin. This behavior had been seen at a relatively low occurrence in the pre-Cenozoic, dominated by therapsids, early-triassic cynodonts and some early Mammalia. Thrinaxodon was in fact the first burrowing cynodont that we have found, showing similar behavioral patterns to that of Trirachodon. The first burrowing vertebrate on record was the dicynodont synapsid Diictodon, and it is possible that these burrowing patterns had passed on to the future cynodonts due the adaptive advantage of burrowing during the Permian-Triassic Mass extinction. The burrow of Thrinaxodon consists of two laterally sloping halves, a pattern that has only been observed in burrowing non-mammalian Cynodontia. The changes in vertebral/rib anatomy that arose in Thrinaxodon permit the animals to a greater range of flexibility, and the ability to place their snout underneath their hindlimbs, an adaptive response to small living quarters, in order to preserve warmth and/or for aestivation purposes.[7]

A Thrinaxodon burrow contained an injured temnospondyl, Broomistega. The burrow was scanned using a synchrotron, a tool used to observe the contents of the burrows in this experiment, and not damage the intact specimens. The synchrotron revealed an injured Rhinesuchidae, Broomistega putterilli, showing signs of broken or damaged limbs and two skull perforations, most likely inflicted by the canines of another carnivore. The distance between the perforations was measured in relation to the distance between the canines of the Thrinaxodon in question, and no such relation was found. Therefore, we may assume that the Temnospondyl found refuge in within the burrow after a traumatic experience and the T. liorhinus allowed it to stay in its burrow until they both ultimately met their respective deaths. Interspecific shelter sharing is a rare anomaly within the fossil record, this T. liorhinus shows one of the first occurrences of this type of behavior in the fossil record, and however, we are currently unsure if the temnospondyl inhabited the burrow before or after the death of the nesting Thrinaxodon.[15]

Discovery[edit]

Thrinaxodon was originally discovered in South Africa in 1894 and was believed to be isolated to that region.[16] It had not been until 1977 that Thrinaxodon had been rediscovered in Antarctica. Upon the discovery of Thrinaxodon in Antarctica, numerous experiments were done to confirm whether or not they had found a new species of Thrinaxodontidae, or if they had found another area which T. liorhinus called home. The first experiment was to evaluate the average number of pre-sacral vertebrae in the Antarctic vs African Thrinaxodon. The data actually showed a slight difference between the two, in that the African T. liorhinus contained 26 presacrals, while the Antarctic Thrinaxodon had 27 pre-sacrals. In comparison to other cynodonts, 27 pre-sacrals appeared to be the norm throughout this sub-section of the fossil record. The next step was to evaluate the size of the skull in the two different discovery groups, and in this study they found no difference between the two, the first indication that they may in fact be of the same species. The ribs were the final physiology to be cross-examined, and while they portrayed slight differences in the expanded ribs, against one another, the most important synapomorphy remained consistent between the two, and that was that the intercostal plates overlapped with one another. These evaluations led to the conclusion that they had not found a new species of Thrinaxodontidae, but yet they had found that Thrinaxodon occupied two different geographical regions, which today are separated by an immense expanse of ocean. This discovery was one of many to support the idea of a connected land mass, and that during the early Triassic, Africa and Antarctica must have been linked in some way, shape or form.[8]

Phylogeny[edit]

Thrinaxodon belongs to clade Epicynodontia, a sub-division of the greater clade Cynodonta. Cynodonta eventually led to the evolution of Morganucodon and all other mammalia. Cynodonta belongs to clade Therapsida, which was the first major clade along the line of Synapsida. Synapsida represents one of two major splitting points, under the clade Amniota, which also split into Sauropsida, the ancestral clade of today’s reptiles, birds and Crocodylia. Thrinaxodon represents a transitional fossil on the road to humans and other extant mammals.

Cynodontia


Procynosuchus



Dvinia



Epicynodontia

Cynosaurus




Galesaurus



Progalesaurus





Thrinaxodon




Platycraniellus


Eucynodontia

Cynognathia



Probainognathia







In popular culture[edit]

  • In the television series Walking with Dinosaurs, cynodonts were featured in the first episode. The episode was set in Arizona, where an unnamed species of cynodont is known only from teeth. The reconstruction of this cynodont was therefore based primarily on the South African Thrinaxodon.[17]
  • Thrinaxodon is referenced in the trading card game Magic: The Gathering through creatures known as Thrinaxes.[18]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Damiani, R.; Modesto S. Yates A. Neveling J. (2003). Earliest evidence of cynodont burrowing. The Royal Society. pp. 1747–1751. 
  2. ^ a b Blob R. 2001. Evolution of hindlimb posture in non-mammalian therapsids: biomechanical tests of paleontological hypotheses. 27(1): 14-38.
  3. ^ a b c Thrinaxodon. (n.d.). Retrieved March 5, 2015, from http://www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/species/t/thrinaxodon.html
  4. ^ Fernandez, V.; Abdala, F.; Carlson, K. J.; Cook, D. C.; Rubidge, B. S.; Yates, A.; Tafforeau, P. (2013). Butler, Richard J, ed. "Synchrotron Reveals Early Triassic Odd Couple: Injured Amphibian and Aestivating Therapsid Share Burrow". PLoS ONE 8 (6): e64978. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064978.  edit
  5. ^ a b c d Botha J. Chinsamy A. 2005. Growth patterns of Thrinaxodon liorhinus, a non-mammalian cynodont from the lower Triassic of South Africa. Paleontology. 48(2): 385-394.
  6. ^ a b Brink A. Note on a new skeleton of Thrinaxodon liorhinus. Abstract. 15-22.
  7. ^ a b c Damiani R. Modesto S. Yates A. Neveling J. Earliest evidence of cynodont burrowing. 2003. The Royal Society. 1747-1751.
  8. ^ a b Colbert E. Kitching J. 1977. Triassic Cynodont Reptiles from Antarctica. American Museum Novitates. 2611. 1-30.
  9. ^ a b c d Estes R. 1961. Cranial anatomy of the cynodont reptile Thrinaxodon liorhinus. Museum of comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 125: 165-180.
  10. ^ Sidor C. 2001. Simplification as a trend in synapsid cranial evolution. Evolution, 55(7):1419-1442.
  11. ^ Jasinoski S. Abdala F. Fernandez V. 2015. Ontogeny of the Early Triassic Cynodont Thrinaxodon liorhinus (Therapsida): Cranial Morphology. The Anatomical Record. DOI: 10.1002/ar.23116.
  12. ^ a b c d e Abdala F. Jasinoski S. Fernandez V. 2013. Ontogeny of the Early Cynodont Thrinaxodon liorhinus (Therapsida): Dental Morphology and Replacement. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 33(6): 1408-1431.
  13. ^ Abdala F. Jasinoski S. Fernandez V. 2013. Ontogeny of the Early Cynodont Thrinaxodon liorhinus (Therapsida): Dental Morphology and Replacement. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 33(6): 1408-1431.
  14. ^ Botha J. Chinsamy A. 2005. Growth patterns of Thrinaxodon liorhinus, a non-mammalian cynodont from the lower Triassic of South Africa. Paleontology. 48(2): 385-394.
  15. ^ Fernandez V. et al. 2013. Synchrotron Reveals Early Triassic Odd Couple: Injured Amphibian and Aestivating Therapsid Share Burrow. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064978.
  16. ^ Thrinaxodon liorhinus. (n.d.). Retrieved March 5, 2015, from https://paleobiodb.org/cgi-bin/bridge.pl?a=checkTaxonInfo&taxon_no=144734&is_real_user=0.
  17. ^ ABC Online Services (1999). "Walking with Dinosaurs - Fact File: Cynodont". Dino Fact File. Retrieved August 9, 2013. 
  18. ^ "Real- Thinaxdon appear in animal armegaddon. Life Thrinaxes". 2009-05-28. Retrieved 2009-05-28. 
  • Tim Haines and Paul Chambers (2006). The Complete Guide to Prehistoric Life. Firefly Books Ltd., Canada.  69.
  • David Lambert (2003). Dinosaur Encyclopedia. DK Publishing, New York.  202-203.