To Build a Fire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"To Build a Fire"
by Jack London
Genre(s)Adventure, short story, tragedy
Publication date1902, 1908

"To Build a Fire" is a short story by American author Jack London. There are two versions of this story. The first one was published in 1902, and the other was published in 1908. The story written in 1908 has become an often anthologized classic, while the 1902 story is less well known.

The 1908 version is about an unnamed male protagonist who ventures out in the subzero boreal forest of the Yukon Territory. He is followed by a native dog and is en route to visit his friends—ignoring warnings from an older man from Sulphur Creek[1] about the dangers of hiking alone in extreme cold. The protagonist underestimates the harsh conditions and freezes to death after his fire is doused and he is unable to re-light it.

In the 1902 version, though the structure and storyline are similar, the weather is not as cold and horrendous, no dog follows the protagonist, the fire is not doused, and the man (named Tom Vincent in this version) suffers only from severe frostbite and survives to become a more melancholic but wiser person.

"To Build a Fire" is an oft-cited example of the naturalist movement that portrays the conflict of man versus nature. It also reflects London's personal experiences in the Yukon Territory.

1908 version plot[edit]

The unnamed man, a chechaquo (newcomer to the Yukon),[2] sets out to hike through the forests bordering the Yukon River on a winter day where the temperature has fallen to −75 °F (−59 °C). Having ignored warnings against traveling alone in such conditions, he is accompanied only by a large husky dog. The animal's instincts warn it about the dangers of the extreme cold, but the dog reluctantly follows the man. As they follow the course of a frozen creek, the man is careful to avoid patches of thin ice hidden by the snow. His goal is to reach a group of prospectors (referred to as "the boys") at their camp by six o'clock that evening.

At half-past noon, the man stops and builds a fire so he can warm up and eat his lunch. Shortly after resuming his hike, he accidentally breaks through the ice and soaks his feet and lower legs, forcing him to stop and build another fire so he can dry himself. Having chosen a spot under a tree for this fire, he pulls twigs from the brush pile around it to feed the flames; the vibrations of this action eventually cause a large amount of snow to tumble down from the branches overhead and extinguish the fire. The man quickly begins to lose sensation in his extremities and hurries to light another fire, now starting to understand the warnings about the life-threatening danger posed by the extreme cold. He lights the fire, igniting all of his matches and burning himself in the process due to the numbness in his hands. While trying to remove a piece of moss from the fire, he inadvertently pokes the burning twigs apart, extinguishing them.

With no way to start another fire, the man thinks of killing the dog and using its body heat to save himself, but his hands are so stiff that he can neither strangle the animal nor draw his knife to cut its throat. Finally, he tries to restore his circulation by running toward the camp, but stumbles and falls multiple times in the snow. The man feels the cold gradually freezing him to his core, and he ultimately falls asleep and dies of hypothermia. He imagines himself standing with "the boys" as they find his body. The dog leaves the body after dark to find food and shelter at the camp.


Man versus nature is a major theme in the story. The protagonist decides to face the brutally cold temperatures of the Yukon Trail despite being warned by an older man. The short story depicts the protagonist's battle of life and death while highlighting the importance of the fire.[3] Lee Mitchel, a familiar critique of London's work, commented on London's usage of naturalism in his plots. That the efforts of emphasizing the environment too much led, “In turn, everything that somehow contributes to those attempts is doubled and re-doubled, iterated and re-iterated, leaving nothing to occur only once” (Mitchell 78) throughout the story.

One theme illustrated in the story is the man's sense of judgment contrasted with the dog's animal instincts. Throughout the story, London hints that the dog has more knowledge of survival than the man; the judgment-versus-instinct theme is evident when the man builds the first fire. While the dog wants to stay by the fire to keep warm, the man is determined to keep moving. As the dog reluctantly follows the man across a frozen river, the dog is more cautious than the man.

The protagonist's desperation is evident throughout the majority of the story. It is noticeable soon after the man falls into a frozen-over river. To save himself he scrambles to build a fire, but is too busy worrying about his survival to notice the mistake of building a fire underneath a tree that has collected an enormous amount of snow. After the first fire is put out, his desperation becomes more defined as he seemingly will do anything to survive, including attempting to kill his dog for warmth and using all his matches at once in a final attempt to light a fire. His desperation for survival and his fear of death cause him to panic, leading to his final demise as he freezes to death at the end of the story.[4]


Another evident theme in the story is perseverance. Although the man makes several mistakes and gets frostbite in his fingers and toes, he continues to fight for survival. He ignores all the signs that he would not make it to the village he was headed to. For instance, London described “He did not bare his fingers more than a minute and was surprised to find that they were numb".[5] In less than 60 seconds, his fingers were numb, indicating to him that it is too dangerous for him to be outside, yet he progresses despite how dangerous it is.[6]

Wisdom and experience[edit]

Wisdom and experience is another theme that is present throughout the story. London shows that the man lacks the knowledge needed to survive in the Yukon.[7] Based on instincts, the dog knew that it was too cold to travel in the snow. London wrote: "The dog was sorry to leave and looked toward the fire".[5] This line indicates that the dog wanted to be closer to heat. However, the unnamed protagonist ignored all the signs before him. He knew that it was cold but he did not realize the threat this posed on his life. The man's ability to develop arrogance worked against him here, whereas the dog knew better just based on instinct.[8][9]

Stupidity and arrogance are personified in the story's protagonist. For example, he goes through the extremely cold territory alone, despite going for the first time. He laughs off the crucial advice from the old man of Sulphur Creek about traveling with an acquaintance because he thinks he knows what he's doing. This arrogance results in the protagonist putting himself in a dangerous situation that was preventable. At first, he thinks it's nothing and that everything will be fine. By the end of the story, he dies as a result of his arrogance. Through this story, London shows how the man's demise is due to his humanity and lack of knowledge when entering this journey. Also, he shows that the dog survives because of following its instincts which is something that the man does not pay attention to.[10][11] The superior mindset and lack of knowledge of the area around where he traveled led to his downfall as well.[8]

Another example of arrogance occurs when the protagonist disregards the possibility that there may be situations he cannot overcome. The old man warns the protagonist of this and also seems to have a better understanding of the natural world, respecting the fact that there are some situations the man will be unable to control. Not only does the old man see the protagonist's stupidity, but the dog notices the man's lack of knowledge about the terrain's obstacles and challenges after he fails to keep a fire going.[citation needed]


Succumbing to death is another theme in the story, more specifically, the peace that may be found in death. London foreshadows the death of the man early in the story, so it is not a surprise that the man dies, and closer to the end he recalls the cold and the old-timer as he accepts his fate. However, London depicts death quite differently than many other authors do. The man drifts off into a calm, peaceful slumber devoid of suffering and pain. London's use of relaxing words dissuades the reader from feeling a great deal of sympathy for the man, as the death is merciful and graciously anticipated, rather than sad. In contrast to more dramatic depictions of death, London's depiction reveals death as a peaceful escape from tumult and pain.[citation needed]

The description of the protagonist's death has been associated with the discovery of one's self: specifically, that self-discovery is "not a significant psychic discovery" as it results in "the simple physical discovery that the self is body only".[12]


Individualism is another common theme that London portrays in the story. The man only relies on himself and attempts to sacrifice the dog to get him through the Yukon; he doesn't believe that he needs any help. This concept can also be connected to the theme mentioned above of the man's judgment, and the man's arrogance.[citation needed]


Arrogance is another common theme that London uses on the protagonist. The man initially comes off as arrogant when not taking advice from the elder on Sulphur Creek. As readers, we can assume we see and picture the character this way since London purposely doesn't give us a name or much information at all about him. This lack of information doesn't allow us a strong connection or emotions for this character. An Aldersmead Care Home article on what we can learn from our elders argues that “We can choose whose advice and opinions we value… It's also possible to hold disagreements without bearing grudges or holding onto bitterness.”[13][unreliable source?] a lot of arrogance from the protagonist got in the way of his initial judgment when talking to the older man. This lack of respect or ability to take the advice is one of the many reasons he didn't survive.

1902 version[edit]

The earlier version was first published in The Youth's Companion on May 29, 1902.[14] It was Published in Klondike Although it differs in some details, the general structure and storyline are similar; the primary differences are as follows: in the first version it is not as cold, there is no dog, the fire is not doused, and the man (named Tom Vincent) suffers some permanent frostbite damage but survives, sad but wiser. Another difference between the two versions comes from Clell Petersen's analysis of "To Build a Fire". He argues that the 1902 narrator has a love of life that the 1908 narrator lacks, this causes Tom Vincent (the 1902 narrator) to persevere through his journey and not "sit down and die". While the later narrator tries to fight his imminent death he lacks the "'love of life' that would force him to struggle to the end", so he, in the end, accepts it and doesn't complete his journey.[15]


The story was retold in a 2018 a graphic novel by Christophe Chabouté, entitled Construire un feu.

Related films[edit]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "To Build a Fire". To Build a Fire and Other Stories. pp. 64–79.
  2. ^ Haddon, David (January 2012). "Never Absolute Zero". Touchstone. 25 (1): 22.
  3. ^ Mitchell, Lee (1986). "'Keeping His Head': Repetition and Responsibility in London's 'To Build a Fire". 13: 78. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ London, Jack (August 1908). "To Build a Fire". The Century Magazine. Vol. 76. pp. 525–534. Archived from the original on April 1, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019 – via Full text of the famous second version, published for an adult audience.
  5. ^ a b London, Jack (29 May 1902). To Build a Fire. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 1 November 2019.
  6. ^ "To Build a Fire Theme of Perseverance". Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  7. ^ Welsh, James (2004). "Masterplots II: Short Story Series". Revised Edition. 1: 1–3.
  8. ^ a b Adams, George (1995). "Why the Man Dies in 'To Build a Fire'". In Nuernberg, Susan M (ed.). The critical response to Jack London. Greenwood Press. pp. 27–35. ISBN 978-0-313-28927-9. OCLC 604317685.
  9. ^ "To Build a Fire Themes". Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  10. ^ "Jack London's 'To Build a Fire': Epistemology and the White Wilderness". Western American Literature. 5 (4): 287–289. 1971. doi:10.1353/wal.1971.0004. Project MUSE 528939.
  11. ^ Flinck, Amanda (2018-09-19). "THE WATCHING DOG: The Animal Gaze in Jack London's 'To Build a Fire'". hdl:2077/57709. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. ^ May, Charles (Winter 1978). "'To Build a Fire': Physical Fiction and Metaphysical Critics". Studies in Short Fiction. 15 (1): 19–24. INIST:12575166 ProQuest 1297934132.
  13. ^ "Key Life Lessons We Can Learn From Older People". Aldersmead Care Home. 2018-01-18.
  14. ^ London, Jack (May 29, 1902). "To Build a Fire". Youth's Companion. Vol. 76. Archived from the original on September 22, 2018. Retrieved April 16, 2019 – via Full text of the first, more juvenile version.
  15. ^ Nuernberg, Susan M, ed. (1995). The critical response to Jack London. Greenwood Press. pp. 3–8. ISBN 978-0-313-28927-9. OCLC 604317685.
  16. ^ "Construire un feu". UNIFRANCE (in French). Retrieved 2019-04-17.
  17. ^ "Construire un feu (1930)". Internet Movie Database.
  18. ^ "To Build a Fire (1969)". Yahoo! Movies. Archived from the original on 2006-05-16.
  19. ^ "To Build a Fire (2003)". Internet Movie Database.
  20. ^ "Build a Fire (2011)". Internet Movie Database.
  21. ^ Samuel François-Steininger. "To Build a Fire". Indiegogo. Retrieved 2019-04-17.
  22. ^ "COLD on Vimeo". 27 March 2015.

External links[edit]