Tone policing

Tone policing (also tone trolling, tone argument and tone fallacy) is an ad hominem and antidebate appeal based on genetic fallacy. It attempts to detract from the validity of a statement by attacking the tone in which it was presented rather than the message itself.

In Bailey Poland's book, Harassment, Abuse, and Violence Online, she suggests that tone policing is frequently aimed at women and attempts to derail or silence opponents who may be lower on the "privilege ladder".

In changing their tactics to criticizing how the women spoke instead of what the women said, the men created an environment in which the outcome of a dispute was not decided on the merits of an argument but on whether the men chose to engage with the arguments in good faith.

— Bailey Poland, Harassment, Abuse, and Violence Online, page 46

While anyone can engage in tone policing, it is frequently aimed at women as a way to prevent a woman from making a point in the discussion.

— Bailey Poland, Harassment, Abuse, and Violence Online, page 47

In Keith Bybee's How Civility Works, he notes that feminists, Black Lives Matter protesters, and anti-war protesters have been told to "calm down and try to be more polite". He argues that tone policing is a means to deflect attention from injustice and relocate the problem in the style of the complaint, rather than address the complaint itself.

While ad hominem fallacies of relevance are often autologies, critics have argued that tone policing is a flawed concept simply because it is autological. As discussed by The Frisky's Rebecca Vipond Brink, the act of labeling tone policing may itself be considered tone policing:

The problem with telling someone that you have a right to express yourself as angrily as you want to without them raising an objection is that you’re also inherently telling them that they don’t have a right to be angry about the way you’re addressing them.

— Rebecca Vipond Brink, Calling Out Tone-Policing Has Become Tone-Policing

There are some arguments that may get heated, and an attack on the opponent's tone of voice may be a legitimate complaint; however, when such an attack is used deliberately to steer observers away from the validity of an opponent's argument, then it becomes tone policing, an ad hominem counter-offensive. To discern between legitimate concerns and deliberate tone policing may be very challenging.

See also

• Fallacy
• Mansplaining

External links

• Jesse Benn The White Anti-Racism Tone Police: White Supremacy vs. White Privilege The Huffington Post 24 Jul 2015
• Amanda Marcotte Tone Policing Only Goes One Way Raw Story 22 May 2013