Transmembrane protein

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Transmembrane)
Jump to: navigation, search
Schematic representation of transmembrane proteins: 1. a single transmembrane α-helix (bitopic membrane protein) 2. a polytopic transmembrane α-helical protein 3. a polytopic transmembrane β-sheet protein
The membrane is represented in light brown.

A transmembrane protein (TP) is a type of integral membrane protein that spans the entirety of the biological membrane to which it is permanently attached. Many transmembrane proteins function as gateways to permit the transport of specific substances across the biological membrane. They frequently undergo significant conformational changes to move a substance through the membrane.

Transmembrane proteins are polytopic proteins that aggregate and precipitate in water. They require detergents or nonpolar solvents for extraction, although some of them (beta-barrels) can be also extracted using denaturing agents.

The other type of integral membrane protein is the integral monotopic protein that is also permanently attached to the cell membrane but does not pass through it.[1]


Classification by structure[edit]

There are two basic types of transmembrane proteins:[2] alpha-helical and beta-barrels. Alpha-helical proteins are present in the inner membranes of bacterial cells or the plasma membrane of eukaryotes, and sometimes in the outer membranes.[3] This is the major category of transmembrane proteins. In humans, 27% of all proteins have been estimated to be alpha-helical membrane proteins.[4] Beta-barrel proteins are so far found only in outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria, cell wall of gram-positive bacteria, and outer membranes of mitochondria and chloroplasts. All beta-barrel transmembrane proteins have simplest up-and-down topology, which may reflect their common evolutionary origin and similar folding mechanism.

Classification by topology[edit]

This classification refers to the position of the N- and C-terminal domains. Types I, II, and III are single-pass molecules, while type IV are multiple-pass molecules. Type I transmembrane proteins are anchored to the lipid membrane with a stop-transfer anchor sequence and have their N-terminal domains targeted to the ER lumen during synthesis (and the extracellular space, if mature forms are located on plasmalemma). Type II and III are anchored with a signal-anchor sequence, with type II being targeted to the ER lumen with its C-terminal domain, while type III have their N-terminal domains targeted to the ER lumen. Type IV is subdivided into IV-A, with their N-terminal domains targeted to the cytosol and IV-B, with an N-terminal domain targeted to the lumen.[5] The implications for the division in the four types are especially manifest at the time of translocation and ER-bound translation, when the protein has to be passed through the ER membrane in a direction dependent on the type.

3D structure[edit]

Increase in the number of 3D structures of membrane proteins known

Membrane protein structures can be determined by X-ray crystallography, electron microscopy or NMR spectroscopy.[6] The most common tertiary structures of these proteins are transmembrane helix bundle and beta barrel. The portion of the membrane proteins that are attached to the lipid bilayer (see annular lipid shell) consist mostly of hydrophobic amino acids.[7]

Membrane proteins have hydrophobic surfaces, are relatively flexible and are expressed at relatively low levels. This creates difficulties in obtaining enough protein and then growing crystals. Hence, despite the significant functional importance of membrane proteins, determining atomic resolution structures for these proteins is more difficult than globular proteins.[8] As of January 2013 less than 0.1% of protein structures determined were membrane proteins despite being 20-30% of the total proteome.[9] Due to this difficulty and the importance of this class of proteins methods of protein structure prediction based on hydropathy plots, the positive inside rule and other methods have been developed.[10][11][12]

Thermodynamic stability and folding[edit]

Stability of α-helical transmembrane proteins[edit]

Transmembrane α-helical proteins are unusually stable judging from thermal denaturation studies, because they do not unfold completely within the membranes (the complete unfolding would require breaking down too many α-helical H-bonds in the nonpolar media). On the other hand, these proteins easily misfold, due to non-native aggregation in membranes, transition to the molten globule states, formation of non-native disulfide bonds, or unfolding of peripheral regions and nonregular loops that are locally less stable.

It is also important to properly define the unfolded state. The unfolded state of membrane proteins in detergent micelles is different from that in the thermal denaturation experiments. This state represents a combination of folded hydrophobic α-helices and partially unfolded segments covered by the detergent. For example, the "unfolded" bacteriorhodopsin in SDS micelles has four transmembrane α-helices folded, while the rest of the protein is situated at the micelle-water interface and can adopt different types of non-native amphiphilic structures. Free energy differences between such detergent-denatured and native states are similar to stabilities of water-soluble proteins (< 10 kcal/mol).

Folding of α-helical transmembrane proteins[edit]

Refolding of α-helical transmembrane proteins in vitro is technically difficult. There are relatively few examples of the successful refolding experiments, as for bacteriorhodopsin. In vivo, all such proteins are normally folded co-translationally within the large transmembrane translocon. The translocon channel provides a highly heterogeneous environment for the nascent transmembane α-helices. A relatively polar amphiphilic α-helix can adopt a transmembrane orientation in the translocon (although it would be at the membrane surface or unfolded in vitro), because its polar residues can face the central water-filled channel of the translocon. Such mechanism is necessary for incorporation of polar α-helices into structures of transmembrane proteins. The amphiphilic helices remain attached to the translocon until the protein is completely synthesized and folded. If the protein remains unfolded and attached to the translocon for too long, it is degraded by specific "quality control" cellular systems.

Stability and folding of β-barrel transmembrane proteins[edit]

Stability of β-barrel transmembrane proteins is similar to stability of water-soluble proteins, based on chemical denaturation studies. Their folding in vivo is facilitated by water-soluble chaperones, such as protein Skp [1].

3D structures[edit]

Light absorption-driven transporters[edit]

Oxidoreduction-driven transporters[edit]

Electrochemical potential-driven transporters[edit]

  • Proton or sodium translocating F-type and V-type ATPases [7]

P-P-bond hydrolysis-driven transporters[edit]

Porters (uniporters, symporters, antiporters)[edit]

Alpha-helical channels including ion channels[edit]


Proteins with alpha-helical transmembrane anchors[edit]

β-barrels composed of a single polypeptide chain[edit]

Note: n and S are, respectively, the number of beta-strands and the "shear number"[14] of the beta-barrel

β-barrels composed of several polypeptide chains[edit]

See also Gramicidin A [56], a peptide that forms a dimeric transmembrane β-helix. It is also secreted by Gram-positive bacteria.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Steven R. Goodman (2008). Medical cell biology. Academic Press. pp. 37–. ISBN 978-0-12-370458-0. Retrieved 24 November 2010. 
  2. ^ Jin Xiong (2006). Essential bioinformatics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 208–. ISBN 978-0-521-84098-9. Retrieved 13 November 2010. 
  3. ^ alpha-helical proteins in outer membranes include Stannin and certain lipoproteins, and others
  4. ^ Almén MS, Nordström KJ, Fredriksson R, Schiöth HB (2009). "Mapping the human membrane proteome: a majority of the human membrane proteins can be classified according to function and evolutionary origin". BMC Biol. 7: 50. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-7-50. PMC 2739160free to read. PMID 19678920. 
  5. ^ Harvey Lodish etc.; Molecular Cell Biology, Sixth edition, p.546
  6. ^ Cross, Timothy, Mukesh Sharma, Myunggi Yi, Huan-Xiang Zhou (2010). "Influence of Solubilizing Environments on Membrane Protein Structures"
  7. ^ White, Stephen. "General Principle of Membrane Protein Folding and Stability." Stephen White Laboratory Homepage. 10 Nov. 2009. web.
  8. ^ Carpenter, E. P.; Beis, K.; Cameron, A. D.; Iwata, S. (2008). "Overcoming the challenges of membrane protein crystallography". Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 18 (5): 581–586. doi:10.1016/ PMC 2580798free to read. PMID 18674618. 
  9. ^ Membrane Proteins of known 3D Structure
  10. ^ Elofsson, A.; Heijne, G. V. (2007). "Membrane Protein Structure: Prediction versus Reality". Annual Review of Biochemistry. 76: 125–140. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.163539. PMID 17579561. 
  11. ^ State of the art in membrane protein prediction
  12. ^ Hopf TA, Colwell LJ, Sheridan R, Rost B, Sander C, Marks DS (June 2012). "Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing". Cell. 149 (7): 1607–21. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.012. PMC 3641781free to read. PMID 22579045. 
  13. ^ Bracey MH, Hanson MA, Masuda KR, Stevens RC, Cravatt BF (November 2002). "Structural adaptations in a membrane enzyme that terminates endocannabinoid signaling". Science. 298 (5599): 1793–6. doi:10.1126/science.1076535. PMID 12459591. 
  14. ^ Murzin AG, Lesk AM, Chothia C (March 1994). "Principles determining the structure of beta-sheet barrels in proteins. I. A theoretical analysis". J. Mol. Biol. 236 (5): 1369–81. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(94)90064-7. PMID 8126726.