Jump to content

Twistor theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In theoretical physics, twistor theory was proposed by Roger Penrose in 1967[1] as a possible path[2] to quantum gravity and has evolved into a widely studied branch of theoretical and mathematical physics. Penrose's idea was that twistor space should be the basic arena for physics from which space-time itself should emerge. It has led to powerful mathematical tools that have applications to differential and integral geometry, nonlinear differential equations and representation theory, and in physics to general relativity, quantum field theory, and the theory of scattering amplitudes.

Twistor theory arose in the context of the rapidly expanding mathematical developments in Einstein's theory of general relativity in the late 1950s and in the 1960s and carries a number of influences from that period. In particular, Roger Penrose has credited Ivor Robinson as an important early influence in the development of twistor theory, through his construction of so-called Robinson congruences.[3]


Projective twistor space is projective 3-space , the simplest 3-dimensional compact algebraic variety. It has a physical interpretation as the space of massless particles with spin. It is the projectivisation of a 4-dimensional complex vector space, non-projective twistor space , with a Hermitian form of signature (2, 2) and a holomorphic volume form. This can be most naturally understood as the space of chiral (Weyl) spinors for the conformal group of Minkowski space; it is the fundamental representation of the spin group of the conformal group. This definition can be extended to arbitrary dimensions except that beyond dimension four, one defines projective twistor space to be the space of projective pure spinors[4][5] for the conformal group.[6][7]

In its original form, twistor theory encodes physical fields on Minkowski space in terms of complex analytic objects on twistor space via the Penrose transform. This is especially natural for massless fields of arbitrary spin. In the first instance these are obtained via contour integral formulae in terms of free holomorphic functions on regions in twistor space. The holomorphic twistor functions that give rise to solutions to the massless field equations can be more deeply understood as Čech representatives of analytic cohomology classes on regions in . These correspondences have been extended to certain nonlinear fields, including self-dual gravity in Penrose's nonlinear graviton construction[8] and self-dual Yang–Mills fields in the so-called Ward construction;[9] the former gives rise to deformations of the underlying complex structure of regions in , and the latter to certain holomorphic vector bundles over regions in . These constructions have had wide applications, including inter alia the theory of integrable systems.[10][11][12]

The self-duality condition is a major limitation for incorporating the full nonlinearities of physical theories, although it does suffice for Yang–Mills–Higgs monopoles and instantons (see ADHM construction).[13] An early attempt to overcome this restriction was the introduction of ambitwistors by Isenberg, Yasskin and Green,[14] and their superspace extension, super-ambitwistors, by Edward Witten.[15] Ambitwistor space is the space of complexified light rays or massless particles and can be regarded as a complexification or cotangent bundle of the original twistor description. By extending the ambitwistor correspondence to suitably defined formal neighborhoods, Isenberg, Yasskin and Green[14] showed the equivalence between the vanishing of the curvature along such extended null lines and the full Yang–Mills field equations.[14] Witten[15] showed that a further extension, within the framework of super Yang–Mills theory, including fermionic and scalar fields, gave rise, in the case of N = 1 or 2 supersymmetry, to the constraint equations, while for N = 3 (or 4), the vanishing condition for supercurvature along super null lines (super ambitwistors) implied the full set of field equations, including those for the fermionic fields. This was subsequently shown to give a 1-1[clarify] equivalence between the null curvature constraint equations and the supersymmetric Yang-Mills field equations.[16][17] Through dimensional reduction, it may also be deduced from the analogous super-ambitwistor correspondence for 10-dimensional, N = 1 super-Yang–Mills theory.[18][19]

Twistorial formulae for interactions beyond the self-dual sector also arose in Witten's twistor string theory,[20] which is a quantum theory of holomorphic maps of a Riemann surface into twistor space. This gave rise to the remarkably compact RSV (Roiban, Spradlin and Volovich) formulae for tree-level S-matrices of Yang–Mills theories,[21] but its gravity degrees of freedom gave rise to a version of conformal supergravity limiting its applicability; conformal gravity is an unphysical theory containing ghosts, but its interactions are combined with those of Yang–Mills theory in loop amplitudes calculated via twistor string theory.[22]

Despite its shortcomings, twistor string theory led to rapid developments in the study of scattering amplitudes. One was the so-called MHV formalism[23] loosely based on disconnected strings, but was given a more basic foundation in terms of a twistor action for full Yang–Mills theory in twistor space.[24] Another key development was the introduction of BCFW recursion.[25] This has a natural formulation in twistor space[26][27] that in turn led to remarkable formulations of scattering amplitudes in terms of Grassmann integral formulae[28][29] and polytopes.[30] These ideas have evolved more recently into the positive Grassmannian[31] and amplituhedron.

Twistor string theory was extended first by generalising the RSV Yang–Mills amplitude formula, and then by finding the underlying string theory. The extension to gravity was given by Cachazo & Skinner,[32] and formulated as a twistor string theory for maximal supergravity by David Skinner.[33] Analogous formulae were then found in all dimensions by Cachazo, He and Yuan for Yang–Mills theory and gravity[34] and subsequently for a variety of other theories.[35] They were then understood as string theories in ambitwistor space by Mason and Skinner[36] in a general framework that includes the original twistor string and extends to give a number of new models and formulae.[37][38][39] As string theories they have the same critical dimensions as conventional string theory; for example the type II supersymmetric versions are critical in ten dimensions and are equivalent to the full field theory of type II supergravities in ten dimensions (this is distinct from conventional string theories that also have a further infinite hierarchy of massive higher spin states that provide an ultraviolet completion). They extend to give formulae for loop amplitudes[40][41] and can be defined on curved backgrounds.[42]

The twistor correspondence[edit]

Denote Minkowski space by , with coordinates and Lorentzian metric signature . Introduce 2-component spinor indices and set

Non-projective twistor space is a four-dimensional complex vector space with coordinates denoted by where and are two constant Weyl spinors. The hermitian form can be expressed by defining a complex conjugation from to its dual by so that the Hermitian form can be expressed as

This together with the holomorphic volume form, is invariant under the group SU(2,2), a quadruple cover of the conformal group C(1,3) of compactified Minkowski spacetime.

Points in Minkowski space are related to subspaces of twistor space through the incidence relation

The incidence relation is preserved under an overall re-scaling of the twistor, so usually one works in projective twistor space which is isomorphic as a complex manifold to . A point thereby determines a line in parametrised by A twistor is easiest understood in space-time for complex values of the coordinates where it defines a totally null two-plane that is self-dual. Take to be real, then if vanishes, then lies on a light ray, whereas if is non-vanishing, there are no solutions, and indeed then corresponds to a massless particle with spin that are not localised in real space-time.



Supertwistors are a supersymmetric extension of twistors introduced by Alan Ferber in 1978.[43] Non-projective twistor space is extended by fermionic coordinates where is the number of supersymmetries so that a twistor is now given by with anticommuting. The super conformal group naturally acts on this space and a supersymmetric version of the Penrose transform takes cohomology classes on supertwistor space to massless supersymmetric multiplets on super Minkowski space. The case provides the target for Penrose's original twistor string and the case is that for Skinner's supergravity generalisation.

Higher dimensional generalization of the Klein correspondence[edit]

A higher dimensional generalization of the Klein correspondence underlying twistor theory, applicable to isotropic subspaces of conformally compactified (complexified) Minkowski space and its super-space extensions, was developed by J. Harnad and S. Shnider.[4][5]

Hyperkähler manifolds[edit]

Hyperkähler manifolds of dimension also admit a twistor correspondence with a twistor space of complex dimension .[44]

Palatial twistor theory[edit]

The nonlinear graviton construction encodes only anti-self-dual, i.e., left-handed fields.[8] A first step towards the problem of modifying twistor space so as to encode a general gravitational field is the encoding of right-handed fields. Infinitesimally, these are encoded in twistor functions or cohomology classes of homogeneity −6. The task of using such twistor functions in a fully nonlinear way so as to obtain a right-handed nonlinear graviton has been referred to as the (gravitational) googly problem.[45] (The word "googly" is a term used in the game of cricket for a ball bowled with right-handed helicity using the apparent action that would normally give rise to left-handed helicity.) The most recent proposal in this direction by Penrose in 2015 was based on noncommutative geometry on twistor space and referred to as palatial twistor theory.[46] The theory is named after Buckingham Palace, where Michael Atiyah[47] suggested to Penrose the use of a type of "noncommutative algebra", an important component of the theory. (The underlying twistor structure in palatial twistor theory was modeled not on the twistor space but on the non-commutative holomorphic twistor quantum algebra.)

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Penrose, R. (1967). "Twistor Algebra". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 8 (2): 345–366. Bibcode:1967JMP.....8..345P. doi:10.1063/1.1705200.
  2. ^ Penrose, R.; MacCallum, M.A.H. (1973). "Twistor theory: An approach to the quantisation of fields and space-time". Physics Reports. 6 (4): 241–315. Bibcode:1973PhR.....6..241P. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(73)90008-2.
  3. ^ Penrose, Roger (1987). "On the Origins of Twistor Theory". In Rindler, Wolfgang; Trautman, Andrzej (eds.). Gravitation and Geometry, a Volume in Honour of Ivor Robinson. Bibliopolis. ISBN 88-7088-142-3.
  4. ^ a b Harnad, J.; Shnider, S. (1992). "Isotropic geometry and twistors in higher dimensions. I. The generalized Klein correspondence and spinor flags in even dimensions". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 33 (9): 3197–3208. Bibcode:1992JMP....33.3197H. doi:10.1063/1.529538.
  5. ^ a b Harnad, J.; Shnider, S. (1995). "Isotropic geometry and twistors in higher dimensions. II. Odd dimensions, reality conditions, and twistor superspaces". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 36 (9): 1945–1970. Bibcode:1995JMP....36.1945H. doi:10.1063/1.531096.
  6. ^ Penrose, Roger; Rindler, Wolfgang (1986). Spinors and Space-Time. Cambridge University Press. pp. Appendix. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524486. ISBN 9780521252676.
  7. ^ Hughston, L. P.; Mason, L. J. (1988). "A generalised Kerr-Robinson theorem". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 5 (2): 275. Bibcode:1988CQGra...5..275H. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/5/2/007. ISSN 0264-9381. S2CID 250783071.
  8. ^ a b Penrose, R. (1976). "Non-linear gravitons and curved twistor theory". Gen. Rel. Grav. 7 (1): 31–52. Bibcode:1976GReGr...7...31P. doi:10.1007/BF00762011. S2CID 123258136.
  9. ^ Ward, R. S. (1977). "On self-dual gauge fields". Physics Letters A. 61 (2): 81–82. Bibcode:1977PhLA...61...81W. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(77)90842-8.
  10. ^ Ward, R. S. (1990). Twistor geometry and field theory. Wells, R. O. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521422680. OCLC 17260289.
  11. ^ Mason, Lionel J.; Woodhouse, Nicholas M. J. (1996). Integrability, self-duality, and twistor theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 9780198534983. OCLC 34545252.
  12. ^ Dunajski, Maciej (2010). Solitons, instantons, and twistors. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198570622. OCLC 507435856.
  13. ^ Atiyah, M. F.; Hitchin, N. J.; Drinfeld, V. G.; Manin, Yu. I. (1978). "Construction of instantons". Physics Letters A. 65 (3): 185–187. Bibcode:1978PhLA...65..185A. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(78)90141-x.
  14. ^ a b c Isenberg, James; Yasskin, Philip B.; Green, Paul S. (1978). "Non-self-dual gauge fields". Physics Letters B. 78 (4): 462–464. Bibcode:1978PhLB...78..462I. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90486-0.
  15. ^ a b Witten, Edward (1978). "An interpretation of classical Yang–Mills theory". Physics Letters B. 77 (4–5): 394–398. Bibcode:1978PhLB...77..394W. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90585-3.
  16. ^ Harnad, J.; Légaré, M.; Hurtubise, J.; Shnider, S. (1985). "Constraint equations and field equations in supersymmetric N = 3 Yang-Mills theory". Nuclear Physics B. 256: 609–620. Bibcode:1985NuPhB.256..609H. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90410-9.
  17. ^ Harnad, J.; Hurtubise, J.; Shnider, S. (1989). "Supersymmetric Yang-Mills equations and supertwistors". Annals of Physics. 193 (1): 40–79. Bibcode:1989AnPhy.193...40H. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(89)90351-5.
  18. ^ Witten, E. (1986). "Twistor-like transform in ten dimensions". Nuclear Physics. B266 (2): 245–264. Bibcode:1986NuPhB.266..245W. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90090-8.
  19. ^ Harnad, J.; Shnider, S. (1986). "Constraints and Field Equations for Ten Dimensional Super Yang-Mills Theory". Commun. Math. Phys. 106 (2): 183–199. Bibcode:1986CMaPh.106..183H. doi:10.1007/BF01454971. S2CID 122622189.
  20. ^ Witten, Edward (2004). "Perturbative Gauge Theory as a String Theory in Twistor Space". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 252 (1–3): 189–258. arXiv:hep-th/0312171. Bibcode:2004CMaPh.252..189W. doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1187-3. S2CID 14300396.
  21. ^ Roiban, Radu; Spradlin, Marcus; Volovich, Anastasia (2004-07-30). "Tree-level S matrix of Yang–Mills theory". Physical Review D. 70 (2): 026009. arXiv:hep-th/0403190. Bibcode:2004PhRvD..70b6009R. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.026009. S2CID 10561912.
  22. ^ Berkovits, Nathan; Witten, Edward (2004). "Conformal supergravity in twistor-string theory". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2004 (8): 009. arXiv:hep-th/0406051. Bibcode:2004JHEP...08..009B. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/08/009. ISSN 1126-6708. S2CID 119073647.
  23. ^ Cachazo, Freddy; Svrcek, Peter; Witten, Edward (2004). "MHV vertices and tree amplitudes in gauge theory". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2004 (9): 006. arXiv:hep-th/0403047. Bibcode:2004JHEP...09..006C. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/09/006. ISSN 1126-6708. S2CID 16328643.
  24. ^ Adamo, Tim; Bullimore, Mathew; Mason, Lionel; Skinner, David (2011). "Scattering amplitudes and Wilson loops in twistor space". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 44 (45): 454008. arXiv:1104.2890. Bibcode:2011JPhA...44S4008A. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/45/454008. S2CID 59150535.
  25. ^ Britto, Ruth; Cachazo, Freddy; Feng, Bo; Witten, Edward (2005-05-10). "Direct Proof of the Tree-Level Scattering Amplitude Recursion Relation in Yang–Mills Theory". Physical Review Letters. 94 (18): 181602. arXiv:hep-th/0501052. Bibcode:2005PhRvL..94r1602B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.181602. PMID 15904356. S2CID 10180346.
  26. ^ Mason, Lionel; Skinner, David (2010-01-01). "Scattering amplitudes and BCFW recursion in twistor space". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2010 (1): 64. arXiv:0903.2083. Bibcode:2010JHEP...01..064M. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2010)064. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 8543696.
  27. ^ Arkani-Hamed, N.; Cachazo, F.; Cheung, C.; Kaplan, J. (2010-03-01). "The S-matrix in twistor space". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2010 (3): 110. arXiv:0903.2110. Bibcode:2010JHEP...03..110A. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)110. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 15898218.
  28. ^ Arkani-Hamed, N.; Cachazo, F.; Cheung, C.; Kaplan, J. (2010-03-01). "A duality for the S matrix". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2010 (3): 20. arXiv:0907.5418. Bibcode:2010JHEP...03..020A. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)020. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 5771375.
  29. ^ Mason, Lionel; Skinner, David (2009). "Dual superconformal invariance, momentum twistors and Grassmannians". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2009 (11): 045. arXiv:0909.0250. Bibcode:2009JHEP...11..045M. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/11/045. ISSN 1126-6708. S2CID 8375814.
  30. ^ Hodges, Andrew (2013-05-01). "Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2013 (5): 135. arXiv:0905.1473. Bibcode:2013JHEP...05..135H. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2013)135. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 18360641.
  31. ^ Arkani-Hamed, Nima; Bourjaily, Jacob L.; Cachazo, Freddy; Goncharov, Alexander B.; Postnikov, Alexander; Trnka, Jaroslav (2012-12-21). "Scattering Amplitudes and the Positive Grassmannian". arXiv:1212.5605 [hep-th].
  32. ^ Cachazo, Freddy; Skinner, David (2013-04-16). "Gravity from Rational Curves in Twistor Space". Physical Review Letters. 110 (16): 161301. arXiv:1207.0741. Bibcode:2013PhRvL.110p1301C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.161301. PMID 23679592. S2CID 7452729.
  33. ^ Skinner, David (2013-01-04). "Twistor Strings for N = 8 Supergravity". arXiv:1301.0868 [hep-th].
  34. ^ Cachazo, Freddy; He, Song; Yuan, Ellis Ye (2014-07-01). "Scattering of massless particles: scalars, gluons and gravitons". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014 (7): 33. arXiv:1309.0885. Bibcode:2014JHEP...07..033C. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)033. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 53685436.
  35. ^ Cachazo, Freddy; He, Song; Yuan, Ellis Ye (2015-07-01). "Scattering equations and matrices: from Einstein to Yang–Mills, DBI and NLSM". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (7): 149. arXiv:1412.3479. Bibcode:2015JHEP...07..149C. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)149. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 54062406.
  36. ^ Mason, Lionel; Skinner, David (2014-07-01). "Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014 (7): 48. arXiv:1311.2564. Bibcode:2014JHEP...07..048M. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)048. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 53666173.
  37. ^ Berkovits, Nathan (2014-03-01). "Infinite tension limit of the pure spinor superstring". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014 (3): 17. arXiv:1311.4156. Bibcode:2014JHEP...03..017B. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2014)017. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 28346354.
  38. ^ Geyer, Yvonne; Lipstein, Arthur E.; Mason, Lionel (2014-08-19). "Ambitwistor Strings in Four Dimensions". Physical Review Letters. 113 (8): 081602. arXiv:1404.6219. Bibcode:2014PhRvL.113h1602G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.081602. PMID 25192087. S2CID 40855791.
  39. ^ Casali, Eduardo; Geyer, Yvonne; Mason, Lionel; Monteiro, Ricardo; Roehrig, Kai A. (2015-11-01). "New ambitwistor string theories". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (11): 38. arXiv:1506.08771. Bibcode:2015JHEP...11..038C. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)038. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 118801547.
  40. ^ Adamo, Tim; Casali, Eduardo; Skinner, David (2014-04-01). "Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations at one loop". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014 (4): 104. arXiv:1312.3828. Bibcode:2014JHEP...04..104A. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)104. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 119194796.
  41. ^ Geyer, Yvonne; Mason, Lionel; Monteiro, Ricardo; Tourkine, Piotr (2015-09-16). "Loop Integrands for Scattering Amplitudes from the Riemann Sphere". Physical Review Letters. 115 (12): 121603. arXiv:1507.00321. Bibcode:2015PhRvL.115l1603G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.121603. PMID 26430983. S2CID 36625491.
  42. ^ Adamo, Tim; Casali, Eduardo; Skinner, David (2015-02-01). "A worldsheet theory for supergravity". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (2): 116. arXiv:1409.5656. Bibcode:2015JHEP...02..116A. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)116. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 119234027.
  43. ^ Ferber, A. (1978), "Supertwistors and conformal supersymmetry", Nuclear Physics B, 132 (1): 55–64, Bibcode:1978NuPhB.132...55F, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90257-2.
  44. ^ Hitchin, N. J.; Karlhede, A.; Lindström, U.; Roček, M. (1987). "Hyper-Kähler metrics and supersymmetry". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 108 (4): 535–589. Bibcode:1987CMaPh.108..535H. doi:10.1007/BF01214418. ISSN 0010-3616. MR 0877637. S2CID 120041594.
  45. ^ Penrose 2004, p. 1000.
  46. ^ Penrose, Roger (2015). "Palatial twistor theory and the twistor googly problem". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 373 (2047): 20140237. Bibcode:2015RSPTA.37340237P. doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0237. PMID 26124255. S2CID 13038470.
  47. ^ "Michael Atiyah's Imaginative State of Mind"Quanta Magazine


  • Roger Penrose (2004), The Road to Reality, Alfred A. Knopf, ch. 33, pp. 958–1009.
  • Roger Penrose and Wolfgang Rindler (1984), Spinors and Space-Time; vol. 1, Two-Spinor Calculus and Relativitic Fields, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Roger Penrose and Wolfgang Rindler (1986), Spinors and Space-Time; vol. 2, Spinor and Twistor Methods in Space-Time Geometry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]