Unequal leg length
|Unequal leg length|
|A girl with a congenital, structural difference in leg lengths is walking in a clinic.|
Unequal leg length (also termed leg length inequality, LLI or leg length discrepancy, LLD) is where the legs are either different lengths or appear to be different lengths because of misalignment. The condition has been estimated to affect between 40% and 70% of the population, with at least 0.1% having a difference greater than 20 mm.
There are two main types of leg length inequalities:
- Structural differences are caused by the legs themselves being measurably different in length, usually due to differences in the length of the femur in the thigh or the tibia and fibula bones in the lower leg. This may be a birth defect or it may occur after a broken leg, serious infection, or local damage to one of the growth plates in a leg.
- The other, more common, type is seen when the legs themselves are the same length, but due to neuromuscular injuries in the pelvis or upper leg, one leg or hip is held higher and tighter than the other (hypertonicity in the musculature of the pelvis or leg). These unequally tightened muscles cause the legs to seem to be different lengths, even though careful measurement would show equal lengths of the actual leg. This is called leg length alignment asymmetry (LLAA) and can be seen while lying down.
Diagnosis and workup
Unequal leg length in children is frequently first suspected by parents noticing a limp that appears to be getting worse. The standard workup in children is a thorough physical examination, including observing the child while walking and running. Also, at least in United States, standard workup in children also includes X-rays to quantify actual length of the bones of the legs.
On X-rays, there is generally measurement of both the femur and the tibia, as well as both combined. Various measuring points for these have been suggested, but a functional method is to measure the distances between joint surfaces:
- Femur length: The superior aspect of the femoral head and the distal portion of the medial femoral condyle.
- Tibial length: The medial tibial plateau and the tibial plafond
A leg length difference can result from a pelvic torsion
Abnormal (gravity drive) pronation will drive the innominate bones forward (anteriorly). The forward rotation of the innominate will shorten the leg (See Rothbart 2008). The more pronated foot will have the more forwardly rotated innominate bone. And will be the side with the functionally short leg.
The most common treatment for discrepancies in leg length is the use of a simple heel lift, which can be placed within the shoe. In cases where the length discrepancy is moderate, an external build up to the shoe is usually more comfortable. In severe cases, surgery can be used to make the longer leg shorter (or impede its growth), and/or make the shorter leg longer via limb lengthening.
Although prone "functional leg length" is a widely used chiropractic tool in their Activator technique, it is not a recognized anthropometric technique, since legs are usually of unequal length, and measurements in the prone position are not entirely valid estimates of standing X-ray differences. Measurements in the standing position are far more reliable. Another confounding factor is that simply moving the two legs held together and leaning them imperceptibly to one side or the other pr oduces different results.
Clinical measurement of leg length conventionally uses the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the medial malleolus. Projectional radiographic measurements of leg length have two main variants:
- Teleroentgenogram, which projects the entirety of both legs at the same time.
- Orthoroentgenogram, which takes separate images of the hip, knee and ankle.
- Gurney, Burke (2002-04-01). "Leg length discrepancy". Gait & Posture. 15 (2): 195–206. doi:10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00148-5. ISSN 0966-6362.
LLD is a relatively common problem found in as many as 40  to 70%  of the population. In a retrospective study, it was found that LLD of greater than 20 mm affects at least one in every 1000 people .
- Knutson G. A. (2005). "Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: A review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part II, the functional or unloaded leg-length asymmetry". Chiropractic & Osteopathy. 13 (12): 12. doi:10.1186/1746-1340-13-12. PMC 1198238.
- "Leg Length Discrepancy (Pediatric)". Columbia University. Retrieved 2019-02-14.
- Sabharwal, Sanjeev; Kumar, Ajay (2008). "Methods for Assessing Leg Length Discrepancy". Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 466 (12): 2910–2922. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0524-9. ISSN 0009-921X. PMC 2628227.
- D W Rhodes, E R Mansfield, P A Bishop, J F Smith. The validity of the prone leg check as an estimate of standing leg length inequality measured by X-ray. J Manipulative Physiol Ther.; 18 (6):343-6
- Hanada E, Kirby RL, Mitchell M, Swuste JM (Jul 2001). "Measuring leg-length discrepancy by the "iliac crest palpation and book correction" method: reliability and validity". Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82 (7): 938–42. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.22622.
- "Adjusting the Joints, on season 12, episode 10". Scientific American Frontiers. Chedd-Angier Production Company. 2001–2002. PBS. Archived from the original on 2006.. Video discusses Activator technique and leg length
- Page 305 in: M. Lynn Palmer, Marcia E. Epler, Marcia F. Epler (1998). Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Assessment Techniques. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 9780781710077.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
- Page 269 in: Dror Paley (2002). Principles of Deformity Correction, Volume 1. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9783540416654.
- Sabharwal, Sanjeev; Zhao, Caixia; McKeon, John; Melaghari, Todd; Blacksin, Marcia; Wenekor, Cornelia (2007). "Reliability Analysis for Radiographic Measurement of Limb Length Discrepancy". Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 27 (1): 46–50. doi:10.1097/01.bpo.0000242444.26929.9f. ISSN 0271-6798.