Jump to content

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1058

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 00:39, 21 July 2016 (Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.1)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

UN Security Council
Resolution 1058
Serbia (orange) and Macedonia (green)
Date30 May 1996
Meeting no.3,670
CodeS/RES/1058 (Document)
SubjectThe situation in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Voting summary
  • 14 voted for
  • None voted against
  • 1 abstained
ResultAdopted
Security Council composition
Permanent members
Non-permanent members
← 1057 Lists of resolutions 1059 →

United Nations Security Council resolution 1058, adopted on 30 May 1996, after recalling previous resolutions including resolutions 1027 (1995) and 1046 (1996), the Council extended the mandate of the United Nations Preventive Deployment Force (UNPREDEP) in Macedonia until 30 November 1996.[1]

The UNPREDEP mission played an important role in maintaining peace and stability in Macedonia and the security situation had improved. On 8 April 1996, Macedonia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) signed an agreement and both were now called upon to define their common boundary.

All Member States were urged to positively consider requests from the Secretary-General for assistance to be provided to UNPREDEP, requesting the Secretary-General to report by 30 September 1996 on the situation in the country and the strength and mandate of UNPREDEP.

Resolution 1058 was adopted by 14 votes to none against, with one abstention from Russia.[2]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Security Council extends until 30 November mandate of the Preventive Force in former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia". United Nations. 30 May 1996.
  2. ^ United Nations, Office of Public Information (1996). UN monthly chronicle, Volumes 32–33. United Nations, Office of Public Information. p. 62.