United States withdrawal from the United Nations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

United States withdrawal from the United Nations concerns how since the 1990s some conservative members of the United States Congress[1] have claimed that the United Nations, which it has been a member of since its inception as a supranational entity in 1945,[2] subverts US sovereignty.

Alabama congressman Mike Rogers has called to leave the UN in the wake of the brexit vote by the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union.[3] Utah state representative Don Bush, has claimed that many programs by the supranational entity have violated the US Constitution, such as the implementation of the International Court of Justice and the Law of the Sea Treaty, both of which the United States does not currently endorse.[4]


A sign advocating America's withdrawal produced by the John Birch Society

Opposition to the United Nations and its predecessor, the League of Nations, has existed from the time of formation. The John Birch Society, an anti-communist group founded in 1958, was opposed to US involvement from the society's beginning.[5] From an early date they had bumper stickers with the slogan "Get the U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S.!"[6] Another withdrawal advocate at the time was the National Review, which once editorialized that the UN should be "liquidated".[6]

Public opinion[edit]

According to the polling organization Rasmussen Reports, in the year 2004 a minority of 44% of United States Citizens had a favorable view of the United Nations. This number continued to decline steadily, and two years later in 2006 that number had fallen to 31%. As of 2006, 26% of Americans say "the U.S. should not be involved" with the United Nations, with a moderate majority of 57% supporting remaining a member.[7] The 2006 poll surveyed 1000 adults.[8] A 2008 poll by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs shows that 39% find it "very important" and 21% "not important" to strengthen the U.N.[9] In 2013, a Media and Public Opinion Research Group poll found that 38% of Americans would like less involvement with the UN.[10] Some ranking leaders of the United Nations have suggested that the United States government has been projecting a negative image of the UN, although this allegation is denied by the US. Few observers expect the "U.S. out of U.N."[11] movement to result in the US actually withdrawing for the foreseeable future.

Some controversy occurred in 1992 when US Army medic Michael New protested the United Nations by refusing to wear the UN insignia on his uniform during a peacekeeping mission to Macedonia.[12] Michael New faced a court martial and was subsequently discharged for his disobedience to his commanding officer; to this day he still has the belief that he was correct to refuse service under the United Nations.[13]


In 1997 legislation H.R.1146 was introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Congressman Ron Paul of Texas under the label "American Sovereignty Restoration Act". In addition to withdrawal, the bill also proposed expelling the United Nations Headquarters from its territory within the City of New York[14] and no longer providing the large plurality of funds which the US contributes to the UN annually.

The bill was met with minimal support. Further legislation has been suggested, although none has been organized in the form of a comprehensive bill. H.R.1146 has been introduced annually by the Rep. Paul since 1997, most recently in 2007. Sporadic and ineffectual efforts of a similar nature have been attempted in some state legislatures around the country. For instance, on January 19, 1995 a piece of legislation was introduced by Utah state representative Don Bush titled "The National Security Revitalization Act" which called on the US Congress to restrict participation in UN peacekeeping operations.[11][15]

It was similar in form to bill H.R. 1146, although it had far more provisions such as a reaffirmation of the US support for NATO, and was therefore not exclusively a withdrawal bill. State representative Bush claimed "I had about 25 legislators that signed up for it and there was a lot of other support. The leadership in the House kept it from coming out on the floor." The bill garnered so little support that it was never brought to a vote, despite an overwhelming partisan advantage for State representative Bush's Republican Party in the Utah state legislature.[citation needed]


Unilateralism has had a long history in the United States. In his famous and influential Farewell Address, George Washington, the first President of the United States, warned that the United States should "steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world".[16] Many years later, this approach was labeled as isolationism, but some historians of American diplomacy have long argued that "isolationism" is a misnomer, and that American foreign policy, beginning with Washington, has traditionally been driven by unilateralism. Recent works that have made this argument include Walter A. McDougall's Promised Land, Crusader State (1997) and John Lewis Gaddis's Surprise, Security, and the American Experience (2004). Advocates of American unilateralism argue that other countries should not have "veto power" over matters of U.S. national security. Presidential Candidate John Kerry received heavy political heat after saying, during a presidential debate, that American national security actions must pass a "global test".[17] This was interpreted by Kerry opponents as a proposal to submit American foreign policy to approval by other countries. Proponents of American unilateralism generally believe that a multilateral institution, such as the United Nations, is morally suspect because, they argue, it treats non-democratic, and even despotic, regimes as being as legitimate as democratic countries, and withdrawing from the United Nations would be a symbolic move at further distancing the United States from foreign control.[citation needed]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "Congressional Voting". GovTrack. 
  2. ^ "Beginning of the United Nations". United Nations Official Website. Archived from the original on February 18, 2010. 
  3. ^ In the wake of Brexit, Alabama congressman wants U.S. to exit U.N.
  4. ^ "Congressional withdrawal legislation". United States House of Representatives. Archived from the original on November 7, 2007. 
  5. ^ "Happy Birthday JBS!". John Birch Society. Archived from the original on 2007-12-09. Retrieved 2007-12-31. 
  6. ^ a b Joe Conason (December 3, 2004). "John Birch lives". Salon.com. Retrieved 2007-12-31. 
  7. ^ "Popularity of the United Nations". Rasmussen Reports. 
  8. ^ "Should the United States continue to participate in the United Nations?". Rasmussen Report. Retrieved 2007-12-31. 
  9. ^ "Global Views 2008" (PDF). Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Retrieved 2010-06-04. 
  10. ^ "January 2013 Monthly Report" (PDF). MPO Research Group. Retrieved 7 June 2013. 
  11. ^ a b "New Push to get the US out of the UN". World Net Daily. 
  12. ^ Julie Foster (February 8, 2000). "Michael New goes to court". worldnetdaily. Retrieved 2008-01-19. 
  13. ^ Michael New (January 1, 2000). "United States v. Michael G. New". mikenew.com. Retrieved 2008-01-19. 
  14. ^ "Congressional withdrawal legislation, H.R.1146". govtrack.us. Archived from the original on November 7, 2007. 
  15. ^ Don Bush (January 19, 1995). "The National Security Revitalization Act". Utah State House of Representatives. Retrieved 2008-01-19. 
  16. ^ George Washington (January 1797). "Washington Farewell Address". Yale University. Retrieved 2008-01-04. 
  17. ^ Tom Curry (October 1, 2004). "Bush, Kerry clash over history, allies". msnbc.com. Retrieved 2008-01-04. 

External links[edit]