Since when "neutral point of view" is an euphemism for the official point of view?
Answer: Since the significance of Wikipedia for education has been realised...
What's common between Wikipedia and Islam?
Answer: Both ban images (iconoclasm :)
Copyright paranoia will ultimately destroy Wikipedia
When publicly available information is declared "holy private intellectual property", this property cult will ultimately paralyse everything, because any possible action will become a patent, copyright or trademark violation.
Dubito ergo cogito; cogito ergo sum.
A sentence over which "conspiracy theory" debunkers should think. (Translation: I doubt, therefore I think; I think, therefore I am.) --Rene Descartes
Wikipedia has a lot of very useful articles, but...
But is the subject of your interest even slightly related to politics or economics? Do you believe the official U.S. version on the 11 September 2001 events? And perhaps you believe in the Tooth fairy too? :) OK, you can assert your beliefs even more if you read Wikipedia then – it won't disappoint you. Otherwise, I'd recommend you go elsewhere.
Wikipedia without the fig-leaf of neutrality
There should be a quote here, but I'm not allowed to place it directly and was advised to give an attribution link to it. So here it is (see the text on green background).
.svg)
