From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
fr-3Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau avancé de français.
es-1Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.
la-0Hic usor linguam latinam non intellegit aut eam intellegit aegre.
de-0Dieser Benutzer hat keine Deutschkenntnisse.
nl-0Deze gebruiker begrijpt geen Nederlands.
ga-0Níl Gaeilge ag an úsáideoir seo, nó is beag atá sí aige.
Search user languages
  • For the rest of my userboxes, see /boxes.


Working on:[edit]

(among other things, and always inconsistently)

Other subpages[edit]

Past Contributions[edit]

Articles that I have created[edit]

Some articles that I have majorly edited[edit]

I also edited various things before registering; most (I think) of them can be found at Special:Contributions/ I'm fairly certain that I added to some articles for elements in the 120s (such as unbiunium?) around that time, but that the article was deleted before being re-created in 2004 (I'm assuming that the logs don't go back that far), so I have no way of verifying this.

Personal Editing Philosophies (not comprehensive)[edit]

Some guidelines (mostly consistent) that I have been using are:

  • Unless I add new content equivalent to about a sentence, I try to mark edits as "minor."

I am trying to do things in such a way that will make Wikipedia more respected. On the surface, this has mainly been things like adding and discussing sources. Obviously, I cannot make Wikipedia more respected, but I am trying to help. I like the "mission statement" for Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check.

For now, this is about as controversial as I get: My personal equivalent of "RC Patrol" might be called "deletion patrol." It is unfortunate that so many things almost get deleted (or do get deleted) because speedy deletion templates were misapplied, not enough research into notability was done, etc.


Academically, my "main" interests are physics and mathematics (formally), and genealogy/history, linguistics/languages (informally). My "other" interests are everything else.

If you know your ancestry back to the Middle Ages in Europe, then we are almost certainly related. Feel free to let me know!

This sentence is a placeholder for any further autobiographical details that may be added.


Invitation to discuss on Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Cyrillic)[edit]

As there is already an only proposed Wikipedia guideline on naming conventions (Cyrillic). The proposal is still in development, under discussion and needs of gathering consensus for adoption. Since I am well experienced on this subject, I would like to criticize the official transliteration of Bulgarian as it gives too many errors, which also causes some losses of sounds “ǎ (a hacek”), decentralise itself from other slavic languages (“c” and “š” voices), which is also conflicting in itself (see street signs 1 and 2). By this revision, it is away from being accurate and not able to satisfy the needs of an encyclopedia which claims to be scientifical. These are the reasons I invite you to read Scientific transliteration of Cyrillic and involve the discussion in order to contribute a possible concensus. Wish to see you here thanks Manaviko (talk) 13:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)