User:BorgHunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikipedia This is a Wikipedia user page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BorgHunter.

BorgHunter

BorgHunter (contribs | edit count | deletions | blocks | protections): Registered member since February 2005; administrator since December 2005.

Awards

I don't have enough to merit a subpage. :(

Jm approved.JPG
I'm Jokermage and I approve this Wikipedian! Paid for by the Jokermage for Chief Librarian Campaign. [1]
Minor Barnstar.png
Minor edits are often-overlooked, but essential, contributions to the Wikipedia. The Minor Barnstar is awarded for making minor edits of the utmost quality. —Zero 21:47, 22 February 2006 (UTC) [2]
SIF-Overhead-Wires-1-Cropped.jpg
I, Lcarsdata, award you this telegraph pole for being kind and giving good advice.Lcarsdata Talk | @ | Contribs | My RfA 15:28, 30 April 2006 (UTC) [3]
Star Trek Barnstar.png
With the authority bestowed on me by the Federation Council I hereby award you the Starfleet barnstar for the creation and recreation of rank insignias for the Starfleet ranks and insignia article. --Cat out 23:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC) [4]
Surreal Barnstar.png
The Surreal Barnstar
You get a Barnstar too. Best edit summary I've read in months. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:49, 8 July 2010 (UTC) [5]

(In reference to [6])


Other projects

Milestones

  • 1st "unofficial" edit: [7]
  • 1st official edit: [8]
  • 100th edit: [9]
  • 500th edit: [10]
  • 1000th edit: [11]
  • 2000th edit: [12]
  • 3000th edit: [13]

Userspace pages


This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

Multi-licensed into the public domain
I agree to multi-license my eligible text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions in the public domain, please check the multi-licensing guide.