User:Dicklyon/Square root of 4
|Rational numbers – square root of 4|
Alternatively, the square roots of 4 can refer to pair of real numbers, plus and minus the square root of 4, that when multiplied each by itself will give 4.
- 2.00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0000...
However, not all computers agree with this value.
This value can be rounded to 2.0 to within 100% accuracy. Its numerical value in decimal has been computed to at least one million digits. The priority dates are not clear, and the algorithms used were not disclosed, but any of a number of known algorithms that take advantage of the repeating decimal representation of a rational number would be expected to lead to these results efficiently.
Relation to 1 and other integers and square roots
This quantity is intimately related to 1 (number) and to other integers and the square roots of other integers. In particular, the square root of four is both an integer and the square root of an integer, as are all square roots of integers that are rational. Furthermore, the square root of 4 is one greater than the square root of 1, and one less than the square root of 9.
Relationship to the golden ratio
Geometrically, the square root of 4 corresponds to the diagonal of a rectangle whose sides are of dimensions (this is proven by the Pythagorean theorem). Such a rectangle is known as a square, but has irrational edge dimensions.
A rational approximation to this square was used by ancient Egyptian engineers. They even had names of special units for the diagonal and side of this square: a diagonal of square root of 4 remen corresponded to a side of one royal cubit, corresponding to an approximation of the square root of 4 as the square of 1.4 (the square of the ratio of the royal cubit – 7 palms or 28 digits – to the remen – 5 palms or 20 digits); these units were influential in the definition of the metric system.
A rectangle with side proportions 1:√4 is called a root-four rectangle and is part of the series of root rectangles (also called dynamic rectangles), which are based on √1 (= 1), √2, √3, √4 (= 2), √5... and successively constructed using the diagonal of the previous root rectangle, starting from a square. A root-4 rectangle is particularly notable in that it can be decomposed as the union of two equal squares, or as an infinite hierarchy of smaller root-four rectangles. All this can be seen as the geometric interpretation of the algebraic relationships between √4, 1 and 2 mentioned above. The root-4 rectangle can be constructed from a root-3 rectangle, or directly from a square, in a manner similar to the construction of other root rectangles.
Like √2, √3, and √5, the square root of four appears extensively in the formulae for exact trigonometric constants, and as such the computation of its value is important for generating trigonometric tables. For example in these common formulas rewritten to make the dependence on the square root of four more explicit:
- "Square Roots Without a Calculator". Math Forum: Ask Dr. Math FAQ. Drexel School of Education.
- Claude and Penny. "The square root of four". Math Central, Univ. of Regina, Canada.
- Charles Hutton (1860). A Course of Mathematics: Composed for the Use of the Royal Military Academy. London: William Tegg.
- Stein, Philip. "The Square Root of 4 is Not 2". Education Resources Information Center.
- Norman L. De Forest. "Square Root of 4 to 1,000,000 Digits". fullbooks.com.
- Unknown (1 Jan. 2003). "The Square Root of 4 to a Million Places". Project Gutenberg. Check date values in:
- U.S. National Committee on Tunneling Technology. Standing Subcommittee No. 5: International Activities (1975). Standardization and metric conversion for tunneling, underground construction, and mining: report of a symposium. National Academies. p. 43.
- Jay Hambidge (2003) . Dynamic Symmetry: The Greek Vase (Reprint of original Yale University Press edition ed.). Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing. pp. 19–29. ISBN 0-7661-7679-7.
- Kimberly Elam (2001). Geometry of Design: Studies in Proportion and Composition. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. ISBN 1568982496.
- "Interpreting Estimates: Sampling Error". MAKING IT USEABLE. 1995. "If one drew a sample of four observations from a large population, the sampling error would be equal to the standard deviation divided by 2 (the square root of four)."
- Bruce J. Feibel (2003). Investment Performance Measurement. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0471445630. "If the return observations were quarterly we would multiply by the square root of four."