From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[en] As a dedicated Wikimedian, I don't limit myself to just one project or just one language.
admin opining matrix fun awards
Note: I recently was informed that this page looks like crap in Firefox. Not sure why, as it works just fine in Safari, which is what I use. I may try to fix it at some point.

Everything you need to know about me as an admin/bureaucrat, plus everything I need to reference to be an admin/bureaucrat. (purge)

Wikipedia Administrator.svgThis user has been an admin for
13 years, 2 months and 20 days.
Wikipedia bureaucrat.svgThis user has been a bureaucrat for
11 years, 7 months and 24 days.

WikiDefcon 2
High level of vandalism.

6.18 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot —15:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 03:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

:See also: WP:RFA/RfA and RfB Report
Crat tasks
USURP reqs 1
CHU reqs 1
RfAs 0
RfBs 0
Overdue RfBs 0
Overdue RfAs 0
Approved BRFAs 0
The Signpost
27 January 2020

If you're unhappy with some admin-ish thing I've done...[edit]

...I'd recommend you drop me a line on my talk page.

Actually, I'd recommend you take a deep breath, make sure I actually did screw up (entirely possible), then drop me a line.

Please, do not email me about admin stuff; I try to keep everything on-wiki if at all possible. If I've blocked you, there's always {{unblock}}; I also keep all blocked user talk pages on my watchlist, and will check back on them a few hours after I've left my notice.

Also, I am open to administrator recall. To see my criteria for recall, read User:EVula/opining/admin recall.

My admin info![edit]


I was made an administrator on November 7, 2006. My RfA closed with a vote of 62/0/0. Near as I can tell, I'm admin #1,047.

My first RfB was closed as non-consensus on July 1, 2007; the second was also closed as non-consensus on 24 December, 2007. My third RfB passed (122/1/2) on 3 June, 2008.

I was granted Oversight privs after my election on February 16, 2009.


Usual haunts[edit]

I want to spend more time at




RfA closure[edit]

AfD closure[edit]

  • {{subst:at}} '''RESULT'''. ~~~~
  • {{subst:ab}}
  • Reminder: remove the "REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE" template (go figure!)
  • Tag talk page with {{Oldafdfull}}

XfD closure[edit]

  • {{subst:mfd top}}'''Reason''' ~~~~
  • {{subst:mfd bottom}}
  • {{subst:tfd top}}'''Reason''' ~~~~
  • {{subst:tfd bottom}}


  • {{subst:Welcomeg}}
  • {{subst:Uw-block1}} ~~~~
  • {{subst:nn-notice|Article}} ~~~~
  • {{subst:Vandalblock}} (or {{subst:UsernameBlocked}} ) + {{indefblock}}
  • {{subst:Usrcvtext|Article}} ~~~~
  • Creating test articles: {{subst:Test1article|Article}} ~~~~
  • {{unblockabuse}}

Personal boilerplates[edit]

Non-user talk templates[edit]


Faux AIV Noticeboard[edit]




Faux UAA Noticeboard[edit]

  • {{subst:UsernameBlocked}} ~~~~
  • {{subst:Uw-ublock}} ~~~~
  • {{subst:UsernameHardBlocked}} ~~~~



Not a blatant violation of the username policy. do not report a name unless it is blatantly obvious with editing evidence. You can discuss with them or raise at a request for comment (see instructions WP:UAA/I, N.J.A. | talk 11:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment: To say it a different way L293D, you should not report a username unless it has edited or attempted to edit(tripped a filter). If they haven't edited, the name is not a serious problem requiring an immediate block. There are many reasons someone might register a username and never use it(usually to prevent someone else from registering it, especially in the case of a business). 331dot (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. -- Deepfriedokra 08:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy., though welcomed user and noted COI resources, N.J.A. | talk 11:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)