User:False Prophet/Rfa criteria
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quality edits is defined as the following:
- Mainspace: VP, creation, non-minor, clean up, adding sources and refs, adding quality info
- Talk:Article discussion about content or ideas, straw poll creation or vote
- User Page: 50-100 edits, determined at my discression on a case by case basis
- User talk: warnings, welcome notes, questions related to articles, or invites
- Wikipedia: all non-minor edits; Wikipedia Talk: most edits to this portion are quality edits
- Portal: all non-minor edits
- Portal Talk: anything on topic is a huge boost.
- Minor edits are nice and helpful, but an admin should be an active editor that makes normal edits daily.
- Mediation commitee and ArbComm membership helps alot.
- Esperanza membership for a reasonable amount of time can be a decision maker on close canidates.
- VP is almost a necessity
- Admins should be active in Wikiprojects. They should have membership to a few and be making a lot of contributions
Not admin worthy actions
- Blocked within the past 3 months
- subject of an ArbComm case due to behavior
- WP:CIVIL violations
- Have participated in 5 GAN's
- Have participated in 10 FAC's
- Have Voted in 5 FAC's
- Have written at least 1 article
- Have voted in 10 Deletion debates
- 2 must be AFD
- either the canidate should have participated in every deletion debate category, or have 3 in one deletion category other than afd.
- should have intermediate html and wikimarkup skills